Reading Festival: Radiohead's modern jazz wrong-foots the crowd
In a festival heavy on over-familiar or unimpressive bands, it was left to last night's closing act Radiohead to wrong-foot everyone. The odds on their angst-ridden singer Thom Yorke's first words being "Whassup?" followed by the initial hit song they've all but disowned, "Creep", would have been prohibitively long.
The next hour, in which, on songs such as "All I Need", Radiohead casually become a modern jazz quintet, xylophones, brushed cymbals and a crooning Yorke to the fore, leads to such a thinning of the crowd around me, I could almost walk up to the singer. They gradually relent, with hits including "Street Spirit (Fade Out)", "Lucky" and "Karma Police", averting a challenging and muted end.
Before Radiohead, Sunday offers a crash course in competing schools of American rock, from Vampire Weekend's lilting, African-influenced pop to fellow New Yorkers Yeah Yeah Yeahs, whose scratchy art-punk guitars are a back-drop to singer Karen O, who limbo-leans back, suggestively swallowing her mic. I leave an epic song by psychedelic Texans White Denim, which may still be going on now, for Britain's reigning hardcore punks, Gallows. The band are fuller and more complex than they first appear, as is fearsomely tattooed singer Frank Carter. He growls his dystopian lyrics, but doesn't pretend he has a bite to match, inviting his mum on stage.
Another, older punk, Frank Turner, adds a blunt obituary of every group's efforts this weekend: "None of this is going anywhere and pretty soon we'll all be old/ And no one on Earth will even care". His raw-throated songs make the effort seem worth it anyway.
Contrariness and an interest in the ordinary emotions of English life fight against crowd-pleasing festival convention through Saturday, not least in Arctic Monkeys' headline set, from which Alex Turner seems wryly detached. The riff-heavy street-tales of their first album send the pint cups flying. But Turner is more interested in new song "Cornerstone", a perfectly wrought shaggy dog story.
Glasvegas's singer James Allan looks the spit of Joe Strummer in a black biker's jacket. They're sometimes over-slick, but within their booming cavern of sound, you can still hear the pain which inspired it. Newcastle's Maximo Park let the Trojan Horse of their big pop tunes sometimes overwhelm the intellectual interest in hedonism which first made them special. As if aware of this, singer Paul Smith wheels on a brass band, bringing North-east culture to Berkshire.
Ian Brown also enters to a brass fanfare. The morning after Oasis split, the man Liam Gallagher copped his moves from jogs and mumbles absently, his arrogance absurd in a way Liam never dared. The addition of the Stone Roses' great Northern tribal funk single "Fools Gold" lifts a cinematic set.
When darkness falls here, it's so deep you can hardly see the person in front of you, much less those strewn on the ground. The Prodigy, another tired name, nevertheless add an air of menace as the sun sets.
The field is dustier, the crowd more shattered and the weather worse for Radiohead. But they send the last stragglers home happy.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
That "thinning crowed" you call it. It's merely people who show little interest in the band in the first place or are there for a hit song.
I know reviews are subjective, but this review is harsh to the extent that it's not a true reflection of them that day. All in all this journalist needs a brain check!
Delighted new fan.
I saw thousands of young people who were up for a good time disperse and dissapear as the music got worse and worse. Is it any crime for a reviewer to notice and report this?
Radiohead fans, time to rise up at last and demand some TUNES from your boys or ask for your money back.
Radiohead is well rubbish.
Indeed it is hard to think of any worthwhile music over the last 10, 20, 30, 50 years that did not have some kind of memorable tune or melody. It is not everything in music, but everything is founded on it in some form or other.
The wilful refusal of this basic premise by Radiohead renders the last ten years or so of their recorded output frankly ultimately meaningless and self defeating.
It is rather hilarious to see so many intelligent fans (and Radiohead) completely ignorant of this basic fact.
Perhaps if Radiohead fans were just a little more critical of their darlings then the music they produce would be more than a little...better.
Emperor's new clothes anyone?
And yes, I was there! :-)
In my opinion, Radiohead have developed much over the last few years. You seem to view their prime as the release of 'The Bends' and the subsequent years (you express your enthusiasum for the tracks 'Just' and 'Street Spirt'). However the sound on 'The Bends' is very different to the sound on 'In Rainbows'. True Radiohead appreciators have moved with Radiohead into this new direction and also understood its new beauty. On Sunday, Radiohead were not trying to be 'just-another-rock-band', Radiohead were trying to express power and emotion into the crowd in a new shape that may not be as accesible. For those who could understand, the Reading performance was truly an incredible one. I think that you are unfairly expecting the Radiohead of 'The Bends' and earlier albums, and so this made it harder for you to appreciate what else was going on.
Also, the thinning of the crowd means nothing. Just because Radiohead fans are different in the way that they dont want to crush each other doesnt mean that they arent enjoying the music. In fact, i think it says good things about the sophistication and class of the crowd rather than its sparceness.
I hope you enjoyed my rant.
Why are all the Radiohead fans here unable to accept that not everyone saw their performance in the same way that they did? Are people not supposed to be allowed not to enjoy Radiohead?! If so it sounds like the scary kind of conformist world that the band are, I am informed, so often criticising...
So, try again but this time with a little more thought and just a touch of grace.
And stop being a drama queen! "conformist world" the band lives in!? grow up. There's no BIG CONSPIRACY the band is involved in that entails nobody being allowed not to like the music. In fact, all we are saying is that the review is unfair, only looking at one opinion, that they baffled bored fans, whereas, many loved the performance. If you want fairness, look at both sides to a coin. And not ALL Radiohead fans think the same way, that's a ridiculous generalization.
So calm down, and realize everyone's opinion is valid, mine, your "gracefull" self, and everyone elses. There's a "thought".
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter
As for Radiohead, I thought they were great and turned in a brilliant set. Full of classics and post OK computer favourites like National anthem and Idioteque.
Also I think the jibe about the prodigy is misplaced, they had a great show and wound up the crowd into a frenzy.
Here you are moaning about the bands, when a much more important story should be that of what happened after Radiohead. I was seriously scared for my life at one point; having to put my tent down (which was in the middle of yellow 7 campsite about 100 feet from the main fire and riot) whilst a bunch of idiots ruined my weekend running round shouting "one more tent!". I actually thought i was going to die inside a tent which i had borrowed from a friend for the weekend.
These riots go on every year because these people get away with it, and one reason they get away with it is because there is no media coverage. Which is confusing as the violence seemed to be worse than that which is readily reported at football matched. Security we attacked, the riot police were also attacked, a fire engine had things thrown at it, fireworks were being fired at tents and the electric wires were being pulled down, along with the tall wooden posts holding them up.
It was a scaring experience and i am shocked it has not been widely reported, as i feel if something is not done it is not going to be long before someone is unable to get out of their tent as it is dragged onto a fire with gas cannisters being thrown onto it (not as far fetched as it sounds, only difference is that this year people climbed out of their tents).
Why not report on that rather than moaning about how the bands who have been around for ages played songs that have been around for ages (doesnt take a genius to work that one out), especially as i feel you totally ignored the fact that loads of bands were amazing; the lockdown stage was an amazing area, all the bands i saw there were unbelievably good. And for the record i thought that Radiohead were brilliant, having only realy heard their song 'Creep' i was blown away by their show.
In conclusion, as stated earlier, why not use your platform to mention the havoc and fear that was experienced by many after the music had finished, something which I am sure would do wonders to help make Reading festival better, as a number of the crowd did not appear to be there for the music, only to go rioting, theiving and assulting on the sunday night, something which deffinately brought the atmosphere in the arena right down.
But you didn't pick up on any of that did you.
Radiohead were phenominally creative as showed when they introduced some of there new material and re-workings of some of their older tracks. Jazz? you were probably thinking of Jizz at the time!
Their gig was nothing less than magical, Thom Yorke being authentic and passionate as ever. And opening up with Creep was the most generous thing they could do for their fans! And where was the critic when spectators waved their hands during Paranoid Android to the delight of Collin Greenwood?
And what exactly is the critic's definition of jazz?