Music

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Regina Spektor, Hyde Park, London

(Rated 3/ 5 )

Acoustics subdue Spektor sound

Reviewed by Rob Sharp

In the red: Spektor is loved by fans for her multifaceted eccentricities

AP

In the red: Spektor is loved by fans for her multifaceted eccentricities

If Florence Welch boasted a Voice so powerful at Glastonbury that it warranted its own capital letter, then Regina Spektor should make a call to her manager. Because while Florence has lungs so capacious she can distort the most hardy of sound systems, Regina has the range, the power, the vocal nuance and the intelligence to trounce her. In a "sing-off", Spektor would win hands-down.

And that virtuoso prowess was on display in abundance at this, the first of three concerts to be held in a tent next to Hyde Park's Serpentine Gallery. Those attending were treated to various warm-up acts as well as the main event, in a mini-festival-type setting that was fenced off from the riff-raff.

Eventually, several hundred of London's best-attired and sophisticated gig-goers crammed into a sweaty, dark venue to heroine-worship a 29-year-old, Soviet-born, highly-educated anti-folk New Yorker. As you do.

People love Spektor for her multifaceted eccentricities. At one point she is singing about a "poor little rich boy" reading Hemingway and F Scott Fitzgerald, the next she's whacking the furniture for the sound it makes.

Spektor is cosmopolitan incarnate. Born in Moscow to a violinist and music professor, her family emigrated to the US during perestroika. The burgeoning kook then studied under Sonia Vargas, a professor at the Manhattan School of Music, and spent a further four years honing her skills in another New York music college. She had time out at a butterfly farm as well as a spell in Tottenham (from the sublime to the bathetic). She then became part of the East Village's anti-folk movement, and her two most recent albums, 2006's Begin to Hope and this year's Far have both been critically well-received.

Tonight, Spektor bounced on like she was a 12-year-old performing at a barmitzvah, telling the crowd how amazing it was to be there before hunching over her piano. The acoustics in the tent weren't great; those who sidled in at the front to get a sidelong look were by far the most advantaged. At the back the lyrics were barely audible – and they are half the reason to listen to her.

But the crowd went wild as Spektor began with "Folding Chair" – "Just come and open up your folding chair next to me/My feet are buried in the sand and there's a breeze" – moving through an eclectic set with reggae, folk, pop and rock influences.

Other highlights were "Blue Lips", and "On the Radio"; as well "Laughing With God", the latter potentially a witty take on the capriciousness of an agnostic, or maybe Spektor was just saying that blasphemy isn't funny. People happily sang along to "Poor Little Rich Boy", the story of a middle class lad who moans when he has nothing really to moan about. "That Time" went down equally well, featuring the line "Hey I remember that time when I would only read Shakespeare", which presumably prompted much tittering of self-recognition at the back.

An extended encore included "Us", "Ghost" and "Fidelity", a treatise on not letting go in a relationship until you really love somebody, of which most people can dredge up memories ("I never love nobody fully, always one foot on the ground"). It's mind-blowingly obvious that Spektor has a college-load of talent. Listening to her songs in the privacy of one's home is enjoyable, but live, surrounded by her sometimes self-satisfied fans, is a different matter.

Tonight, these revellers screamed Spektor's name as though they were slowly drowning and were crying for someone to lend a hand. Others walked away saying: "This really isn't my cup of tea." At the end, I found myself somewhere halfway between the two.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

were you actually there?
[info]spektator17 wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 09:02 pm (UTC)
this doesn't sound like the gig I was at. we could hear the lyrics perfectly from the back and everyone seemed to be having a fantastic time. and the tent was nowhere near the serpentine gallery - that's over in kensington gardens.
Slightly prejudiced perhaps?
[info]leonie8427 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 10:19 pm (UTC)
It sounds to me like you were prejudiced against her fans, and your review was reeking of it. Very unprofessional that a very talented songster should suffer because you have a bit of a chip on your shoulder about well-educated people? I clicked on this review, found it interesting you only gave three stars and was prepared for a good read - thoroughly disappointed. I'm not even a Regina fan, but I can see you've let your own personal issues get the better of you here. Not well written at all, sorry.
[info]robsharp wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 11:26 pm (UTC)
Actually, quite a lot of the people at the back weren't really listening to it, they were sitting around, chatting to their mates. If they were trying to listen to it, they couldn't have heard what she was singing because the acoustics just simply weren't there.
Regarding my attitude towards her fans, yep, I'm not denying that I found a lot of them smug and self-satisfied - and I knew quite a lot of people there. Of course I don't have a chip on my shoulder against educated people - that would be mental. What I do have a chip on my shoulder about is over-intellectualised, exclusive, wet, kooky nonsense that pretends to be popular music. If you find an atmosphere detestable you have to say something; a review is a subjective piece of writing. But the fact of the matter is, she only got three stars because the tent was hot, overcrowded and you couldn't really hear.
[info]leonie8427 wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 07:09 am (UTC)
It just sounds like you are reviewing her fans rather than the gig itself. It's not her fault that the tent was too hot, why should she be penalised? I take your point about smug 'kooks', but you shouldn't let that affect how you felt about the gig itself - I think reviews should be about the music and how it came across to you. Fair enough to make a point about the acoustics, but did you actually enjoy the songs? Why didn't you go further forward if you were reviewing it? I wanted to read what you thought of her as a live performer in a little more detail. Sentences like:
"Hey I remember that time when I would only read Shakespeare", which presumably prompted much tittering of self-recognition at the back
does come across as bitterness masquerading in humour. I see from your "wet, kooky nonsense" comment that you clearly are NOT a fan of hers anyway. I realise reviews are subjective, I was just hoping for a bit more subject and a little less sarcasm.
[info]leonie8427 wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
By the way, are you the same Rob Sharp who is a Business Journalist? Did you do a presidential site blog? Just wondering.

Most popular in Arts & Entertainment

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date