Music

Showers (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

The Horrors, Concorde 2, Brighton

They might sound good, but all the horror has gone out of it

Reviewed by Simon Price

Didn't it break your heart? When photos of The Horrors in the studio emerged in NME earlier this year, showing them clean-faced, flat-haired and plaid-shirted, it wasn't an unlucky candid camera moment.

This was the image they wanted to present. By releasing these pictures, The Horrors were following a predictable rock trajectory, unveiling the "serious" second album with the invisible tagline "this time it's musical".

Let's get this straight: Rugby-educated toffs dressing like consumptive Edwardian aristos from the imaginations of Stoker or Poe? Cool. Rugby-educated toffs dressing down all the same? Not.

The accompanying quotes from Faris Rotter distancing himself from the "pantomime theatrics" of chaotic early gigs made matters worse. They've even ditched their aliases: Rotter now goes by his given surname Badwan, Joshua Third aka Von Grimm has reverted to Hayward, "Spider" Webb to Rhys, Tomethy Furse is plain old Tom Cowan, and Coffin Joe is Joseph Spurgeon.

What's more, word was that the new release, Primary Colours, was influenced by Krautrock. Always a fast-track to (un)critical acclaim, Krautrock is also a musical dead end, melody sacrificed to monotony. But it spells clever, and clever gets you five stars. Thus Primary Colours has been hailed as the year's unexpectedly brilliant comeback.

Tonight, it's all about the new album. The Primary Colours material is, I concede, impressive and, at close quarters, overwhelming, typified by a discordant, even atonal morass of noise, a locked groove reminiscent of My Bloody Valentine's "Soon" and, over the top, one exuberant melody (almost always coming from one of Webb's several synths). A cursory "Sheena is a Parasite" and "Count in Fives" appear as encores, but early singles "Death in the Chapel" and "She is the New Thing" are omitted.

There's little to look at. Cowan, in his hooped matelot jersey and basin bob, looks as if he's auditioning for a Chapterhouse tribute act. Webb, with sensible side-parting, could be applying for the post-room job vacated by Phil Daniels in Quadrophenia. Hayward, at least, is still unreasonably pretty, single-handedly justifying the girly screams which greet their arrival. And, for all his talk, Faris can't help throwing exaggerated shapes, a twitching leper Christ afflicted by St Vitus's Dance.

While it may be a positive thing that young ears are being exposed to challenging music, if The Horrors had come along looking and sounding like this in the first place they'd still be playing in a Southend pub. If the frilly shirts and freaky hair were a Trojan horse for their new (Neu!) sound, it's worked a dream.

For making a "quality" record, one must reluctantly salute them. I just wish someone else was doing it. Because we can get "quality" records from anyone, but The Horrors were that far more precious commodity: a great pop thing.

"Good" music is the enemy, and in The Horrors' case the enemy is winning: yet another Fun Police victory.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Orror Error
[info]awkward_squid wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 02:22 pm (UTC)
...i don't think the new stuff is that much of a departure from their debut, to my ears- & they are quite capable of banging out 'quality' records & remaining a great pop thing. There's no shame in wanting to be taken seriously & i suppose they got sick of being seen as a joke band, not helped by their 'Boosh' appearance. They are an exceptional band with taste & talent far beyond their years & it's perfectly fine to release uplifting noisy rock to promote their talents rather than scaling lighting rigs & smearing the Fratelli's & irate new yorkers with black paint, as much as they probably deserve it...

Dear Reviewer
[info]vanille_21 wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 04:03 pm (UTC)
God you sound uptight.
Re: Dear Reviewer
[info]awkward_squid wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 06:05 pm (UTC)
you're right, i've had a little look at the bible & that God does sound a bit uptight- eat this, don't eat that, flood this, burn that- he should chill out & take a leaf out of Buddha's book (warts n all expose yet to be released, probably ghost written).
[info]neilson_mackay wrote:
Sunday, 2 August 2009 at 04:38 am (UTC)
I've never heard anybody describe Krautrock as a musical dead end before. The genre is best known for its etheral, limitless sound. While you've quietly muffled your hypocricy by describing the sound as "challenging", there's an evident search here for at least something to criticise. "This was the image they wanted to present"? Who cares? We finished with the clothes thing in 2006.

Most popular in Arts & Entertainment

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date