Green Living

Showers (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

Meet the cosmetic king who prefers his protests muddy

The millionare founder of Lush is no ordinary tycoon – he backs direct action that makes a political stink

By Tom Peck

Mark Constantine disliked protesting at Greenham Common, but now backs groups such as Plane Stupid and Sea Shepherd

RICHARD CANNON

Mark Constantine disliked protesting at Greenham Common, but now backs groups such as Plane Stupid and Sea Shepherd

As the loud-shirted, multi-millionaire purveyor of such bathroom delights as Melting Marshmallow Moments, Vanilla Mountains and Creamy Candy Bath, Mark Constantine is not a man one might naturally associate with batallions of eco-protesters holed up in muddy airport climate camps.

Yet the 57-year-old founder of the high-street chain Lush cosmetics is devoting millions to funding environmental direct-action guerrillas.

The former disciple of Body Shop founder Anita Roddick has never owned a car. He once cut rather a wimpy figure, by his own account, as a "very cold and miserable" protester on Greenham Common.

Twenty-five years later, the so-called bubblebath baron has donated over £500,000 to radical green and humanitarian activists in 12 months. Among the beneficiaries are Plane Stupid, the anti-airport expansion group whose members are known for their willingness to be carted off in police wagons, and Sea Shepherd, the direct action maritime conservation group that has attacked Japanese whaling ships. Constantine is a businessman seemingly revelling in creating a political stink.

"We give to them because no one else will," he said yesterday, breaking cover. "I hate the criminalisation of the environmental movement. These people are vilified as eco-terrorists, when what they're doing is a selfless act. They are trying to look after us," he added. "They need someone to look after them."

He encourages others to throw themselves before the police – and is motivated in part by a sense of inadequacy about avoiding face-to-face protest himself. "I'm not very brave physically and I'm terrified of being incarcerated," he said. "I feel much more effective like this. I like business, and I'd rather make money and give it to those that can use it. Like a Victorian patron kind of thing."

Lush, founded in 1995 to dispense soaps, bubblebaths and fragrances made mainly from vegetable ingredients, made sales of £153m last year from 600 outlets in 43 countries. Constantine has pledged to give a slice of the profits each year to those activists willing to stand up to the powers that be.

He paid the legal costs incurred by Plane Stupid after its members camped on the runway at Stansted in December last year, effectively shutting down the airport.

"His action legitimised the idea of big, ethically run businesses giving money to non-violent direct action groups," says the Plane Stupid spokesman Leo Murray. "People like Mark are not alone in the business world. Hopefully, it will encourage others to do the same." As a maker of beauty products and supporter of radical campaigns, Constantine follows in the footsteps of Body Shop tycoon Dame Anita Roddick, who died in 2007 of a brain haemorrhage. It was Roddick who gave him his first break, over 30 years ago.

"I was making products in my spare bedroom and basically starving to death," he said. "I saw a tiny piece about Anita in Honey magazine, asking for products. She had one shop back then. I sent her some soap samples. and she placed an order for loads of my stuff. It was very exciting." He was to become her biggest supplier in the 80s, with Roddick eventually buying him out for £6m in 1990. He lost the lot in a mail order cosmetics company within two years. But then came Lush, and further riches.

Constantine grew up in Weymouth and left school at 18, by which time he and wife Mo, who works in the business and has invented many of their leading products, had been together for two years. His dalliance with protest was limited to one dreary afternoon on Greenham Common in the 1980s with the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. When he found out that his home town of Poole didn't have any cycle paths, he mapped a cycle network and persuaded the council to make it.

This year Lush launched Shark Fin Soap to highlight the killing tens of millions of sharks each year, many for the production of Shark Fin soup, a Chinese delicacy. Sales have raised £22,000 for Sea Shepherd.

Last year, after a meeting with the civil rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith, Lush launched the Guantanamo Garden foaming bath ball. Named after the garden in which inmates were not allowed to grow anything. The orange soap ball dissolves in the tub, liberating pictures of the British former detainee Binyam Mohamed, and the Sudanese journalist Sami al-Hajj to float to the surface, along with details of the human rights charity Reprieve.

The Guantanamo-themed bath foam raised so much money for the human rights charity Reprieve that one of Mr Mohamed's first actions as a free man was to drop into Lush's Covent Garden office to say thanks. Constantine cheerily refers to his predominantly vegan staff at the Poole headquarters as "lunatics". He adds: "I'm not vegan so they call me the fish and chipocrite."

Over 100 causes have received Lush funds, money generated principally through Charity Pot, a cocoa butter and almond oil body lotion that retails for £10 – all except the VAT goes into a fund given away in lumps of up to £10,000.

"We want unbelievable value for money," Constantine says. "We could have given that whole half-million to one thing, and not seen any effect for the money. It's better to help people who are really dynamic, and see them do tremendous things."

The accounts for the current year are being audited, but Sophie Pritchard, the Charitable Giving Manager who oversees the Charity Pot, says the company intends to double that £500,000 figure next year. Perhaps Constantine can finally rid eco-protesters of their stereotype as long-haired soap dodgers.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

What a stinker!
[info]micky_tayker wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 06:35 am (UTC)
Thanks for the article. Now I have an idea of some of the issues Mr. Constantine supports I shan’t bother to buy any Lush products again.

By the way, the ex-Guantanamo detainee, Binyam Mohamed, is NOT British so please do not refer to him as such. He’s Ethiopian. He just spent a brief amount of time in the UK some years ago, but conveniently managed to pluck the heartstrings of gullible fools like Mr. Constantine to enable him to return to the Land of Milk & Money after being released. As Binyam Mohamed was so delighted with Mr. Constantine’s support, perhaps he’ll be willing to make a considerable donation to one of Mr. C’s favourite charities from the large compensation payout the British taxpayer will inevitably be forced to give him?
Lush right to support Reprieve
[info]andrewb_73 wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 08:56 am (UTC)
Lush were among the few willing to speak out in favour of Binyam Mohamed at a time when his plight was far from the public eye. As is now becoming increasingly apparent, and what Reprieve have been saying all along, is that the British authorities were complicit in Mr. Mohamed's torture, which was severe and prolonged. His detention without trial and torture is contrary to international law and goes against what we claim to stand for as a nation. British national or not, Binyam's treatment by British and American services is an international disgrace and the very least that Britain can do now is to apologise, accommodate and compensate him and others who have been wronged and cleared of wrongdoing.
Re: Lush right to support Reprieve
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 07:29 pm (UTC)
>>His detention without trial and torture is contrary to international law

I've heard of the right to a trial but never a right to torture. Is this a new right?
Constantine Con
[info]davidbla wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC)
The question is how green is Mr Constantine! So he has shops in 43 countries so how does his distribution network work. How much of his stock is airfreighted and that of his suppliers. And how does the stock get to the shops? Of course then there is his customers they will need transport to get to his green and lushus products.

No Mr Constantine go hang your green hat somewhere else you can't con me!
Re: Constantine Con
[info]mmmoment wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC)
Lush products for Europe are all made in Poole, in Dorset, where the company is based and they always have been. They are made by hand, not machines, and therefore provide employment for hundreds of people making the prodcuts and many more selling them. The story is the same in North America, Japan and Australia, who all make products locally for their markets. The ingredients that are sourced abroad, such as cocoa butter and coconut oil, are brought in by sea, not air, and come from fair trade projects supporting local communities in their country of origin.
Re: Constantine Con
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 07:31 pm (UTC)
Most ships produce more carbon dioxide than planes, so using sea transport is worse for the environment.
Re: Constantine Con
[info]perk_i wrote:
Wednesday, 19 August 2009 at 11:44 pm (UTC)
Actually, this statistic is based on the quantity of shipping as opposed to the quantity of air freight, rather than a proportionate assessment of carbon emissions for each form of transport, in which case the former remains both more economical and environmental.
Re: Constantine Con
[info]janetvande wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 07:37 pm (UTC)
Lush has an extensive Internet site so products can be ordered online without driving to a store. That's the only way I've ever ordered, even though there is a retail outlet not terribly far from my home. Products come with minimal packaging, and you know every ingredient that goes into them -- two things I consider very important.

It sounds to me like the company has thought very hard about its environmental impact, including about the whole carbon offsetting process and whether it works for them. The fact that Lush strives to provide both necessities and niceties without toxins and carcinogens says to me it's doing a lot more for the planet than a lot of firms with complicated and probably bogus carbon offsetting plans.

I'd like to ask David: How much of what you buy has to be shipped from one place to another? I'm afraid if you don't grow your own food, make your own soap from your own animal and plant products and you've ever ridden in a car or a bus, then you're quite the hypocrite chastising a company that's working harder than most to do more good than harm.
[info]seanlush wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 02:25 pm (UTC)
Hello David, just wanted to take a sec to respond to your comment about how Lush handles transportation. Since we are an international company operating in 46 countries and using lovely fresh raw materials
from all over the globe, sea, land and air transport makes up our biggest contribution to Climate
Change.

To minimise that, we have reduced the amount of air-freighted raw material to less than 5%, in weight,
of everything we bring into the UK and will keep that as our target. We also work with our international
partners to help them reduce their amount of air-freighted goods coming out of our factory.

We prefer to make fresh products locally using local staff to supply local markets, so we have six
manufacturing units around the world and intend to open a few more in the near future.
Lush hand makes all of it's products in Poole, in Dorset, where the company is based and they always have been. The story is the same in North America, Japan and Australia, who all make products locally for their markets. Hand making our products in different regions of the world makes good environmental sense--fewer miles to transport them from factory to shop--as well as good economic sense--carting things between countries gets costly.

Also, we don’t believe in carbon offsetting. It is a tricky business of ineffective schemes, cheap carbon and
people taking advantage while others try to relieve their guilt.To reduce our flights, we have kindly asked our employees not to take any UK mainland domestic flights. We encourage using video-conferencing, questioning staff’s decisions to fly and making the most out of the trips. For the flights we do take, we tax ourselves £50 per metric tonne of CO2 and use the money to fund transport and climate change groups, as well as internal and external low carbon projects.

But that's all of the big stuff. The smaller things often go unnoticed. Lush encourages people to cycle to work and offers discounts on bikes (mine is leaning against my desk at the moment), and our mail-order packages are all filled with light-weight packaging materials to help reduce the amount of fuel it takes to transport them.

Hope this helped explained some of the things we are up to.

Sean, Lush UK








Misplaced donations
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 07:35 pm (UTC)
Why does Lush fund eco-terrorists to harass people, rather than fund green technology? Researching engines, household appliances, and lightbulbs that produce less CO2 will do more for the environment than sitting around in a field.
Re: Misplaced donations
[info]haute_kitten wrote:
Monday, 17 August 2009 at 09:50 pm (UTC)
uaime5: like was explained in the article, because no one else will. Eco-ACTIVISTS (not terrorists, they don't create terror) fight the good fight to preserve human/animal & all organic life.
LUSH SOME OF YOUR MILLIONS ON SOLARBOTANIC
[info]curefx wrote:
Tuesday, 18 August 2009 at 06:42 am (UTC)
A British company is fighting landscape pollution and global warming, as it has come up with an efficient alternative way to harvest and capture environmental energies. Artificial trees that convert light, heat, sound, rain and wind energy into electricity are a good alternative for energy independence, cutting down our carbon emissions and saving rural England.
A Lush energy tree for everyone Mr. Constantine.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date