Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sex and violence don't sell products and can even 'backfire', study into advertising finds

'People pay more attention to the violence and sex than to the products'

Nick Clark
Tuesday 21 July 2015 18:47 BST
Comments
This advert from mobile phone company Kazam was banned by the Advertising Standards Authority earlier this year for being 'overtly sexual' and 'objectifying women'
This advert from mobile phone company Kazam was banned by the Advertising Standards Authority earlier this year for being 'overtly sexual' and 'objectifying women'

It has long been an old adage in advertising that sex and violence help sell products. But a new study has found that, not only is the maxim incorrect, it can even “backfire” because viewers are so enthralled by the racy content they forget what is being advertised.

Researchers from the American Psychological Association found that sex and violence in adverts does attract viewers’ attention, but at the expense of the product being advertised, and it is all down to evolution, they said.

Advertisers may want to re-think using such themes or even advertising during programmes and films that are notable for their graphic scenes, said Brad Bushman, professor of communication and psychology at The Ohio State University.

“We found almost no evidence that violent and sexual programmes and ads increased advertising effectiveness,” the co-author of the study, which appeared in the Psychological Bulletin journal, said.

It can even be counterproductive as “memory, attitudes and buying intentions all decrease”.

Professor Bushman and lead author Robert Lull analysed 53 studies featuring 8,489 participants carried out last year.

Mr Lull said: “It’s not that people aren’t attracted to sex and violence. On the contrary, people have been attracted since evolutionary times.

“However, it’s at the expense of surrounding content. People pay more attention to the violence and sex surrounding ads than to the products.”

The authors wanted to find out the effectiveness of such advertising on viewers remembering a brand, their feelings towards it and whether they would buy the product. Instead they found out that people remembered only the sex and violence but not what the advert was for.

“Our findings have tremendous applied significance, especially for advertisers,” Professor Bushman said.

“Advertisers should think twice about sponsoring violent and sexual programs, and about using violent and sexual themes in their ads.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in