Gadgets & Tech

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

iSex: How pornography has revolutionised technology

By Matilda Battersby, Jack Riley & Dina Rickman

Super 8 projectors  The Super 8 projector rose to popularity due in part to the large amount of pornographic content which was quickly available for it. The Super 8 camera was a favourite for fraternity house “home movies” although it was a drawback that the film had to be developed. Released in 1965 by Kodak the film came in plastic cartridges containing plenty of potential on their 50 feet of film. But the projector, a temperamental contraption, would sometimes disappoint anxious viewers by refusing to work. 

Super 8 projectors

The Super 8 projector rose to popularity due in part to the large amount of pornographic content which was quickly available for it.

It's the unspoken rule in the world of technology; sex innovates. For generations, the urge to create, disseminate and watch pornography has driven many of the great technological advances we now take for granted.

Click on the image to launch our guide to how pornography has propelled technological innovation.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

interesting article
[info]serendipity707 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 07:00 am (UTC)
The article makes a strong and interesting case. Sorry to be pedantic but there are a couple of errors in it. The word lambasting in the last page actually means to pour scorn - the opposite of its intended usage in the article, and surely the VHS-Betamax format war equivalent was the DVD-HD vs Blue Ray - not DVDs themselves?
pedantic - continued
[info]phm1611 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 07:32 am (UTC)
page eight - home in, not hone in. This is really quite poor.
Police interest in pornography
[info]drg40 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 08:58 am (UTC)
When you had to get your films developed the developer was required in law to notify the police of dubious images and you could go back to collect your films only to find Mr Plod waiting for you.

With Mr Plod's usual competence that meant that fathers taking photo of newborn on rug (very popular in those days) could find themselves in the cells. As widely reported. As now, photographing the wrong things could also land you in trouble.

That was one of the ways censorship was maintained, and was also one of the reasons why home developing became so popular.

It was a standing joke during the period while video cameras were to be hired that most of them went out of the shop accompanied by a wide selection of studio lighting.



Not sure
[info]fastguyeddie wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 11:45 am (UTC)
A lot of padding in there to make an article - can't comment on Super8; and I know that DVD development was funded by the porn industry (now you know what the multi-angle button was going to be for) as to rest the tech came first - the application of it by pornographers second; more daily mailesque titilation intruding.
Misleading title
[info]hankus wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 02:21 pm (UTC)
This article sucks, big time.

Granted, pornography has helped the inventors of many of these technologies make gazillions. However, the basis that the porn industry has pushed the bar for any of them is false advertising from the Independent to sell a headline. I'm disappointed...

The pornographic industry will always gravitate towards whatever can push distribution further, faster and cheaper, and this article merely points out the technologies that have made smut available to all...
OK
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 03:31 pm (UTC)
I wrote something a little more involved than this for my A level Film Studies paper I guess about 12 years back... Funny how little has changed. I think as several people have mentioned the article is a little misleading in suggesting a direct contact and some of the more modern assertions here such as camera phones and voice over IP being driven by its porno advantages are somewhat tenuous as they represent a leap backwards in terms of quality and convenience - I guess I first used VOIP about 1995 when it was rolled out into a large business, but there may be some value in the theory when you start to put the webcam into the equation. Interactive TV I could not figure out - is this meant to imply that when Johnny Smallcock is wacking off over the soccer game he is able to zoom in on Beckham primping himself? When I get home I'll take another look at it.
But there is substantial truth that the superior Betamax format lost out to the inferior VHS system because VHS became the chosen format of the porn industry. Satellite TV and the internet both indirectly promoted themselves on the ability to bring proper porno into your own living room or bedroom (no more Pee Wee Herman moments in that cinema in Soho) free from prudish government censorship (as Stephen Fry once put it "I expected fisting, felching and big Johnny Holmes but what did I get? Rubbish that's what I got!") and the embarrassment you might feel bumping into the vicar when coming out of Private Books Unlimited (or even worse bumping into him in there!) - the internet will be good for your kids learning (nod and wink).
Re: OK
[info]thelatimes wrote:
Monday, 20 July 2009 at 05:05 am (UTC)
kuma2000, did you take your A-levels at the age of 38? Because you look about 50 now on that photo. It would seem that you're suffering from arrested development.
Re: OK
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Monday, 20 July 2009 at 07:55 am (UTC)
I took that A level when I was an adult not when I was at school - you miss my real age by 10 years but I guess when you want to be insulting in a "witty" way you tend to exaggerate. The question is did you go 10 years too much or 10 years too less?
Schoolboy errors
[info]mcmikerg wrote:
Friday, 17 July 2009 at 08:16 pm (UTC)
Sorry to chime in with the pedantry; irrespective of the content, the childish errors on "hone in" and "lambasting" represent astonishingly bad writing and sub-editing. The In-duh-pendent has really gone to sh**.
iSex: How pornography has revolutionised technology
[info]famulla wrote:
Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 07:25 am (UTC)
Is it catching?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
smut
[info]teddave wrote:
Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 10:05 am (UTC)
more smut pls, and more dumb stuff all round. less brainy stuff. more monkey typewriter action. more prurience, more salacious. more gossip, much much more celebrity. no more comment or incision, less anaylsis.

nazi should have won the war . they had the best uniforms. . . that kind a thing pls.
War drives development in most of our technology
[info]corporeal_v001 wrote:
Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 01:48 pm (UTC)

War develops most of the infrastructure technology, porn uses the technology as a delivery mechanism. But for the most part porn is not the primary driver - it competes with many other consumer needs. Eg, VOIP was created for organisations to use their intranet nework for free internal calls, across the building, towns and countries. It wasnt dirty calls that created the VOIP protocol. Also, the internet (tcp/ip network) carries a lot of porn content, but the network was designed for the US military initially.

I suppose the article is a bit tounge-in-cheek in its assumptions regarding the reasons for inventing many of the technologies.
Stupid Article
[info]marktheimmortal wrote:
Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 02:09 pm (UTC)
Let's pick an item of technology and find a way in which porn 'could' have caused it to exist. What a lame article...
The next level
[info]pragmatic55 wrote:
Sunday, 19 July 2009 at 12:52 am (UTC)
On a visit to a university we were shown a system that would allow you to feel the shape and texture of virtual objects such as a toothpaste tube and a sponge rubber dome.

The inventor explained that it could be used for exercise on the space station. A young lady and I just looked at each other as we both identified a more down-to-earth market.
No wonder your women treat you like shit because you worship them like godesses.
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Sunday, 19 July 2009 at 08:09 am (UTC)
No wonder your women treat you like shit, you British men because you worship them like godesses!
Re: No wonder your women treat you like shit because you worship them like godesses.
[info]doc_molotov wrote:
Monday, 20 July 2009 at 12:06 pm (UTC)
Instead of beating them and throwing acid in their faces which you would obviously prefer.
You forgot
[info]smarttog wrote:
Monday, 20 July 2009 at 10:07 am (UTC)
To mention digital cameras, a fantastic format which allows inexperianced people take decent photo's.

The internet also allows me to publish my work, as years ago one had to get into a gallery or a similar establishment.

You can check out my photo's on www.smarttog.com No porn but you will like the photo's....
Pathetic!
[info]algarda wrote:
Monday, 20 July 2009 at 03:54 pm (UTC)
Dubious premise. Badly written article. You could at least have tried getting the chronology of technology right while you were scraping the bottom. Pathetic.

Sex Also Leads Digital Publishing
[info]ladyjaided wrote:
Monday, 20 July 2009 at 05:39 pm (UTC)
Fascinating article. I would just add that erotica and erotic romance, which some call porn for women, is also leading the move toward e-books and digital publishing. Women can buy books that turn them on without having to face a store clerk--and with 24-hour downloads they can get immediate gratification any time of the day or night. Ellora's Cave was the first publisher of digital erotic romance books 9 years ago. We've spawned dozens of imitators and the mainstream romance market is following our lead. Now Amazon, Sony, etc. are rushing to cash in the growing demand for digital books.
Funding change
[info]jonsummys wrote:
Tuesday, 21 July 2009 at 10:33 pm (UTC)
Many of these technologies were created with other goals in mind, but many or most would not have succeeded without porn as a driver - simply put, there are only so many information services that people want enough to pay appreciable money for and so drive technological advance. Porn and sports have always been at the top of the list.

In a similar way, unlicenced copying - so-called piracy of software and media - has funded the development of computer hardware and networking for the last thirty years. Your computer would not be so fast, graphically and aurally capable, or well-connected without the influence of casually copied material. Money that went into hardware would not have been available had it been spent on every software licence, and the resulting lack of richness in user experiences would make one wonder about the point of pervasive computing.

The two meet in that porn gets the least regard for copyright of all, and benefits the most from technically illicit but ignored copying - its spread and growth is unstoppable precisely because it is so easily available, with new audience members finding their preferred viewing niche constantly and quickly.

Most human economic activity over the past 100,000 years has been driven by sexual desire. The surprise is that people today would expect this to have changed.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date