Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Burger King ad backfires after asking Google what's in a Whopper and is told 'cyanide'

The fast-food chain released a 15-second advert in the US which claimed there was not enough time to explain 'all the fresh ingredient in its Whopper sandwich'

Zlata Rodionova
Thursday 13 April 2017 09:18 BST
Comments
Burger King's new advert hijacks your devices

Burger King’s latest advert for its Whopper has backfired after the iconic burger’s Wikipedia page was manipulated to claim that the product contains “cyanide” and is "the worst hamburger product" the fast food chain has ever made.

On Wednesday, Burger King released a 15-second advert in the US which claimed there was not enough time to explain “all the fresh ingredient in its Whopper sandwich”.

Instead, an a Burger King staff member asks Google to do the explaining for him, using the voice prompt: “OK Google, what is the Whopper Burger?” after which the ad ends.

But the marketing stunt backfired after somebody altered the first line of the Wikipedia entry to say that the burger contains “cyanide” and is “cancer-causing”.

The entry also reportedly described the Whooper as "the worst hamburger product" sold by Burger King.

"Burger King saw an opportunity to do something exciting with the emerging technology of intelligent personal assistant devices,” a representative for the chain said on Wednesday.

Burger King, which is owned by Restaurant Brands International, also admitted the advert was not designed in collaboration with Google.

Reports suggested that Google's voice-activated Home smart speaker stopped responding within hours of the commercial’s release, implying that Google had updated the software to stop it from reacting to the specific Burger King advert.

Google did not reply to request for comment.

At the time of writing, the Wikipedia page, described the Whopper as “a hamburger sold by the international fast-food restaurant chain Burger King and its Australian franchise Hungry Jack's”.

It also described it “as the signature product of the company” which is “often at the centre of advertising promotions, product tie-ins, and even corporate practical jokes and hoaxes”.

Additional reporting by Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in