Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oil wouldn't save independent Scotland, warns IFS

Julian Knight
Monday 19 November 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

An independent Scotland could face deeper cuts to public spending than the rest of the UK, despite North Sea oil and gas revenues, the widely respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has concluded.

At present, public spending per head in Scotland is £1,200 higher than the rest of the UK, but household incomes are very similar to the UK norm. The IFS concluded that there is potentially enough oil and gas in the North Sea to support Scotland's higher public spending for a short time, but over the long run the story could be very different.

"Higher public spending than the UK average could be covered by oil and gas revenues if these are assigned on a geographic basis. In the longer run the loss of these revenues would lead to tougher choices than those faced by the UK as a whole," David Phillips, joint author of the report, said.

The IFS report also warned that North Sea revenues were historically very "volatile" and that an independent Scotland could start life with a debt to GDP ratio of close to 70 per cent.

The IFS report will come as a blow to the Scottish National Party government of Alex Salmond, which has long maintained that North Sea revenues will pay for its more extensive public services. It follows a row over whether or not an independent Scotland would be automatically admitted to the European Union or have to apply.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in