Education

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 8° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Thirteen out of 20 top universities misspell ‘university’ on website

By Matilda Battersby

Cambridge, Harvard and Yale are among the top universities found to have embarrassing spelling mistakes on their websites.

Thirteen out of 20 world class university websites analysed by Australian spelling software Spellr.us were found to have miss-spellings of the word ‘university’.

A staggering 14 per cent of university web pages contain at least one genuine spelling error, the survey found, with some of the most prestigious American universities among the worst offenders:

Harvard spelled ‘professor’ wrong on one of its menus and Yale’s website describes the “Universtiy’s ever-expanding international strength.”

Despite representing one of the UK’s oldest and best educational institutions Cambridge’s website was found to have miss-spelled the word ‘service’ in one of its navigational bars.

Spellr.us says the results could have been worse:

“We had our software examine only the first 1000 pages of each site. As most universities contain more than 1000 pages it is safe to assume the results would have been even worse if we’d analysed every page on the site,” said general manager Kevin Garber.

The ten most commonly miss-spelled words were: Accommodation, technology, university, harassment, research, administration, financial, information, association and millennium.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

miss-spelled
[info]naxos wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 05:52 pm (UTC)
magnificent! epic fail there, Matilda, sorry to break it to you.
Mistakes?
[info]civodul71 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:42 pm (UTC)
One could argue that these are hardly spelling mistakes but typing errors.
Or is "Computing Sevices" a Freudian slip?
Re:miss-spelled
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 07:48 pm (UTC)
naxos, misspell is correct.
Eye... plank...
[info]jazzwhistle wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 10:36 pm (UTC)
How about a chance for readers to submit the frequent spelling mistakes in your articles?
University
[info]mrsclaire1964 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 10:38 pm (UTC)
Have they never heard of spell checkers or proof readers?
Re: University
[info]borrowed_din wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 11:15 pm (UTC)
The problem in such cases is that the layout words (such as "Services") embedded in a web page output are usually stored as part of the underlying software code, which dynamically creates each new chunk of HTML according to a specific set of rules. This is especially true of section headings (such as the example shown above). As a result, spell checks actually make little practical sense to the software development team responsible for a web page. Often, one would be checking one word out of several thousand, with the rest of them never appearing in the user interface. The result is that the only way such words are checked is at the point of entry. In my experience, sadly, many software developers are truly abysmal at spelling, so such checks are either error-prone or non-existent.

I am in no way trying to excuse this appalling spelling; I personally think the steady decline of our species' ability to communicate with each other is reprehensible.
Re: University
[info]officegrunt wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 02:57 pm (UTC)
You really think "our species' ability to communicate with each other" is getting bad?

Hmmm. So how many species are we talking about here? I thought there was only one human species, but you seem to be saying there are several, and that species A is getting worse at communicating with species B, which is getting worse at communicating with species C, etc.

OK, maybe I'm being a bit of a pedant. Hey, your spelling's great, though!


Front page misspell on independent!
[info]jazzwhistle wrote:
Thursday, 9 July 2009 at 07:16 pm (UTC)
As if to prove my point... The front page of the independent website right now reads: "Proecutors review phone-hack claims"

Screenshot here: www.woodendummy.fr/proecutors.png

Ouch!

Most popular