Brown backs new tax on banks – but the US is opposed
Britain will not act alone, the Prime Minister tells finance ministers at the G20 summit in St Andrews
Gordon Brown suffered a rebuff from Washington yesterday after he signalled Britain's backing for plans for an international transactions tax on banks to help the world recover from the financial crisis.
At the G20 summit in St Andrews, Fife, the Prime Minister dropped Britain's longstanding opposition to the scheme, which could raise billions a year for poor nations.
But within hours of the significant shift in UK policy on the so-called "Tobin tax", the US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner dismissed the move, saying Washington was "not prepared" to support it.
The Prime Minister called on the IMF urgently to consider the tax on financial transactions which experts say could raise as much as $600bn (£360bn) a year. Mr Brown said the financial collapse last year showed "there must be a better economic and social contract between financial institutions and the public based on trust and a just distribution of risks and rewards".
Addressing finance ministers from the world's richest nations, including Mr Geithner, the Mr Brown added: "I believe we should discuss whether we need a better economic and social contract to reflect the global responsibilities of financial institutions to society. There have been proposals for an insurance fee to reflect systemic risk or a resolution fund or contingent capital arrangements or a global financial transactions levy."
But Mr Geithner, when asked on Sky News whether the US was behind the Tobin tax, said: "That is not something that we are prepared to support. [But] I think we all share a basic interest in trying to make sure we run a system where taxpayers are unexposed in the future and where the financial institutions are bearing the consequences of their mistakes, that they're responsible for the risks they take."
Downing Street insisted Britain had never said it would act alone on the issue. And a No 10 source claimed that some advisers in the Obama administration deemed the transactions tax worthy of examination, despite what Mr Geithner said. Mr Brown also called on finance ministers to agree the cost of tackling climate change, ahead of next month's Copenhagen summit.
Downing Street said the financial transactions tax – named after the economist James Tobin who first proposed the measure in the 1970s – was one of a number of options to restore trust between citizens and banks.
But Mr Brown's decision to put the Tobin tax on the table marked a significant shift in Britain's position. It is also a key development because London is a world centre of finance.
The IoS reported in September divisions between governments over the plan. Anti-poverty campaigners accused Britain of stalling on the tax, which was being pushed by France and Germany at the G20 summit in Pittsburgh that month.
Under one model of the scheme, a tax of 0.05 per cent would be levied on currency, share and derivative transactions. A research paper published last month by the Austrian Institute of Economic Research said this would raise £360bn annually. Yet if a global agreement were to be met, a smaller levy of around 0.005 per cent would be more attainable, raising £36bn.
Mr Brown said any such measure would have to be agreed by all major financial centres and that Britain would not act alone. Sources said the "ball is now in Washington's court" – acknowledging that implementation of the tax would be impossible without the backing of Barack Obama.
Max Lawson, a senior policy adviser for Oxfam, said: "A tax on banks would be a major step towards clearing up the mess caused by their greed. The G20 has a responsibility to act. Every minute, around the world 100 people are forced into extreme poverty as a result of the economic crisis. Money raised by a financial transactions tax on banks could make a massive difference to their lives."
The Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman Vince Cable said: "A Tobin tax is a good idea, but it has been a good idea for decades and governments haven't yet found a way of putting it into practice. It would be a much better use of the short period Gordon Brown has left in office to introduce practical measures such as a government levy on banks which are too big to fail."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
If this is the result, then it will just be another case of Gordon doing something "because he can", and because there's no one in the electorate to complain, ergo, he hangs on to power for longer. Never mind whether its a noble cause or not. For him, its a 'minimal liability' policy. For me, its called irresponsibility - not bearing the consequences of your actions - we're alright Jack. And then he talks about an international 'social contract'. What a hypocrite.
Tax, tax, tax and more effing tax. Are the bloody banks are going to cough up out of their ill gotten gains? Not really. Because they will have covered their naked arses by ensuring the idiot in the street will pay up (generously) for all eventualities.
More shite from NuLabour??
Wonder if anyone still makes Guillotines?
Resign now Brown, call a General Election and leave some semblance of financial order before you bankrupt UK Ltd.
Come on! It was not just America. Gordon Brown's latest cunning plan to save the world was dismissed by the whole of the G20 as old hat and unworkable. The ex-cathedra proclamation by the Saviour of the World was met with derision even by the Russian Finance Minister Kudrin who said: 'Gordon is famous for always raising taxes. It sounds like a good idea, but like most of his suggestions, it will not work in practice.’ The rebuff of the Saviour’s latest call for a new global social contract rather eclipsed the rest of the finance summit.
If is daft because, as a tax on each transaction will include a "Government tax" element. Thus, when you transfer some money by e.g. BACS, the bank will say "Transfer cost £20 plus £3 gov. tax" -> the customer who actually ends up paying the tax, not the banks.
If you want to do this you need to find some way where the banks will pay rather than the customers. Maybe a tax on profits or a tax on bonuses paid (kill two birds with one stone). Maybe neither of these will work (I am no expert) but some way needs to be found where it is not the customer who ends up directly paying as would be the case with Brown's current proposal.
Yet again, Brown needed to try and make his name and short of ideas and things to say this was the best he could find with little warning. And he has again come up with an ill through out idea that has already been rejected by others and he has had it shot down in flames within a few hours. If only he had kept his mouth shut ...
On the other...
'Downing Street sources last night insisted Mr Geithner's intervention was not an outright rejection of the plan. One said: "What he was trying to do was calm down hype that we're about to introduce a massive tax on banks overnight."'
No, that is NOT what Mr. Geithner said.
An unworkable scheme presented by an unspeakable PM
Please do the country and the world a favour RESIGN NOW
The Man is an embarassement to the UK and should resign.
Today on Benelux news channals they were laughing at the man they call Mr Tax !.
Rustigjongens, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Brown/Cable are correct in the principle of a 0.05%/transaction. Tobin Tax. I'd make it 0.1%
It has to Globally, and the Geithner bankster department shouldn't deflect what is right to do.
New Labour is adopting a scorched Earth policy before it is routed in May.
Even at the end they display the morals of the gutter.
Hey, are you by any chance a fiscal policy advisor to Gordon Brown?
Imagine being Gordon erstwhile saviour of the world, last seen jogging his memory in the hope of finding good times.
From his third budget onward the title of Prudence the Incompetent has been well deserved, sadly he managed to carry the title into his unelected premiership, he has become the MP expense we cannot afford, time to go methinks, with an immediate election to follow, come on Gordie do the decent thing and give us a chance to vote the bloody lot of you out.