Lords reject amended law on assisted suicide
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
A move to remove the threat of prosecution from those who go abroad to help an "assisted suicide" was defeated in the House of Lords last night.
The amendment to the Justice & Coroners Bill had been introduced by the former Labour Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer, who had said there was a legal "no-man's land" that required clarity. It is currently illegal to assist suicide by taking a terminally ill person to die abroad, a crime which is punishable by up to 14 years imprisonment. At least 115 people from the UK have gone to Swiss clinic Dignitas to die to date but no-one has been prosecuted.
In a free vote the Lords defeated the amendment to the Coroners and Justice Bill by 194 to 141. The debate in the Lords re-focused attention on the issue of assisted suicide, drawing sharp criticism from church leaders and advocates for the disabled.
The amendment called for the law to be waived if two doctors confirmed the person in question is terminally ill and deemed competent enough to make such a decision to end their life.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
I imagine that she is arguing from fear: fear that she [or others like her] will somehow be forced to end their lives against their will.
What she may fail to understand [indeed, I hope DOES fail to understand] is that opposition to liberalising the law appears selfish, arrogant, and wicked, or myopic, foolish, and misguided to those who are anxious or desperate to end their lives at a time of their choosing: or who perceive that one day they might be.
Life is a right which can be enjoyed. It is NOT a duty to be inflicted mercilessly and unremittingly upon those who experience it as unbearable agony and torment.