UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Tory Eurosceptics threaten 'all-out war' over Brussels

David Cameron's promise of a referendum in 2015 would come too late to placate his MPs and MEPs

By Jane Merrick, Political Editor

Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan resigned last week from the Tory frontbench in the European Parliament in protest against his party's stance on the Lisbon Treaty

pa

Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan resigned last week from the Tory frontbench in the European Parliament in protest against his party's stance on the Lisbon Treaty

David Cameron has been given an 18-month deadline by a powerful band of Eurosceptic Tory MPs to renegotiate Britain's relationship with Brussels or face an "all-out war" for a referendum, it emerged yesterday.

The Conservative leader last week tried to buy more time from the Eurosceptic wing of his party by promising that the Tories' 2015 election manifesto would contain a promise for a referendum should the EU "move in the wrong direction".

Mr Cameron unveiled a list of proposals to assert Britain's sovereignty over Brussels and repatriate certain powers during the next Parliament, if the Tories win the 2010 election.

The shopping list was an attempt to placate his MPs and MEPs after he dropped a pledge to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

But a senior Tory MP said yesterday that Mr Cameron would have to move quickly in the first year and a half of his premiership – and had to show "real progress" on his promises.

The MP said: "I don't think a promise of a referendum on Britain's relationship with the EU in more than five years will sit very well. He [Cameron] needs to make progress, within the first 18 months of his premiership. If he does, it will be his crowning glory, but if he doesn't, it will be a thorn in his side."

Another Eurosceptic backbencher said: "We have agreed to keep quiet on this before the election, but if things do not start happening in the first year or so, there will be all-out war for a referendum."

The warning from the band of Conservative MPs steps up the pressure on the Tory leader after the resignation of two Tory MEPs, Daniel Hannan and Roger Helmer, from the party's frontbench in the European Parliament. The issue threatens to spoil Mr Cameron's honeymoon as Prime Minister if he wins next spring.

Some 47 Tory MPs, including a handful of shadow ministers, signed a Commons motion last month that "insists that the Prime Minister rejects the [Lisbon] Reform Treaty ... and holds a referendum before or after ratification". Mr Helmer and Mr Hannan are both members of the Better Off Out group which wants the UK to withdraw from the EU. There are also five Tory MPs and eight Conservative peers who are members of the group.

The early-day motion was signed before the Czech government finally signed the treaty last week, triggering EU-wide ratification. The next day, Mr Cameron announced he could not hold a referendum on a treaty that had become enshrined in law. He won over many MPs who signed the motion by pledging a UK Sovereignty Bill and a "referendum lock" on a future treaty that ceded further powers to Brussels. But many Eurosceptic Tories have made it clear that the issue will not go away early in the next Parliament.

In a fresh development yesterday, Mr Helmer renewed his attack on the Tory leader's EU policy. He wrote that Mr Cameron's EU policy was "confused", adding: "We have said that now that the Lisbon Treaty is EU law, we are not in a position to repudiate it. Yet we have made a series of proposals which repudiate significant parts of it, and run counter to EU law. But as we all know, the supremacy of EU law is explicit in the Lisbon Treaty. If we accept Lisbon, we accept the supremacy of EU law." He added: "A 'referendum lock' will not work, because we have already thrown away the key. Our policy fails to recognise the self-amending nature of Lisbon."

Mr Helmer said he would campaign for a Tory victory in 2010, but added: "I can neither justify nor support our new EU policy. You can only defy the will of the people for so long."

But Tory MP Mark Pritchard, who had been critical of Mr Cameron, said yesterday: "I support the new policy. I hope it works. If it does not work I will work towards a referendum in the first term of any Conservative administration."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

top-10-tips-to-stress-less-vacations
[info]tiankelan wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 12:20 am (UTC)

Top 10 Tips To Stress-less Vacations






Well since then I have collected a list of "to do's" to make my travel go more smoothly. Since people travel all year round these days, I thought I'd share this list with you. Here's to stress-less vacations.




1. Carry on luggage



2. Keep a standard list of travel items on file, listing all the necessities



3. Identify your luggage with some personalized touch.

4. Stay hydrated while traveling, especially when you fly



5. Take small exercise breaks during your flight



...
my vote is what!!!!!!!
[info]gaswork wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 01:48 am (UTC)
I will never accept the EU as I haven’t had a vote if the vote was yes then I will go with the union but as we know of Irelands No was actually a yes and bullied the second time round the EU are as wasteful as an open tip and are as practical as a hole in the head European Union is costing jobs in our agricultural, fisheries and industry policies bring back commonsense and rid us of all that nonsense the EU is a well organised wall of red tape that have not submitted any proper finances and why should they its full of corrosion corruption and dictation at this moment in time I want OUT so I will be looking towards UKip when I cast my vote the ConLabLib have failed us time and time again of course they do sound very sweet they come in different colour and leave a bitter taste for generations to come
Re: my vote is what!!!!!!!
[info]zugzwang43 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 03:02 pm (UTC)


Why should you accept this, since neither you or I were asked- as promised in the Labour manifesto - our opinion on the subject. Don't believe all you read in manifestos, believe in the Sun, the Star, or the Beano, but not manifestos. by the way, how useful do you find the tips to avoid the stress of vacations ?
Britain as colony of Europe
[info]kimsubok wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 03:09 am (UTC)
Isn't it ironic that Britain, a nation that once had territories and possessions around the world has become a colony of European Imperial Hubris.
Re: Britain as colony of Europe
[info]flacksteen wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:09 am (UTC)
What is worse is to know that the UK now has far less power to manage its own affairs in relation to Brussels than the American State of North Dakota has in relation to Washington. The USA has a constitution which defines what the Federal government can, and cannot, do. Nothing in the USA happens without votes taken by representatives elected by popular vote. The Treaty Gordon Brown signed on our behalf (but without first asking what any of us thought of it) is self-amending. The EU can acquire any new powers it does not already have by simply saying it now has them, again without any popular vote. Laws made by the EU are largely invented by secret committees working in Brussels, not subject to scrutiny by any outside agency, not even the European Parliament. The grand talk of subsidiarity, reserving certain powers to member states, is in practice ignored by the Eurocrats. They can, and do, pass laws that have nothing to do with the operation of a European Federation. Where the European Parliament does have a look in votes can now be dominated by the French and Germans with two or three small countries. The concept of sovereignty has gone out of the window. The EU can, and will, impose its own border guards on us, and tax us directly. Lisbon declares that we are, independently of our status as citizens of the UK, citizens of the EU. So now they can find out who we are and slap tax on each and every one of us. As far as we know, Gordon Brown, who got us into this position, has not read the treaty which gave our freedom away. Even if he has, he certainly has not bothered to explain to us the 'benefits' of Lisbon.
Re: Britain as colony of Europe - [info]steerpike66 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 03:43 pm (UTC) Expand
Trading Blocks
[info]peterhawkins1 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:37 am (UTC)
The English gained parts of the world because they needed to trade and control the conditions of that trade. The Scots joined England to benefit from such trade. When they could, most of these trading areas left the control of the Westminster Parliament, which these Colonies had found wanting in concern and knowledge, the United States of America and Southern Ireland are notable examples. British people who long for those days of Colonial power must come to terms with the simple fact, that there is no queue of former Colonies wishing to return to that status, but there is a queue of States wishing to join the European Union because they wish to be part of this very successful Trading Block.
One of my sons has a business in Southall where he says trade has become very slack. It would appear that the British Economy has suffered from too close a relationship to that of the USA, over which the Westminster Parliament lost control centuries ago. By contrast I live in the Eurozone, in Brittany and here local Tradesmen warn me that they are very busy and not available to do work before next summer.
British History and present day Economic Facts indicate that the only viable future for Great Britain is to take an ever closer part in the Union of the Peoples of Europe. The Right Honourable Mr., David Cameron M.P, must learn to talk sense to the manic members of his party.
The Reverend Peter M. Hawkins.
Re: Trading Blocks
[info]jeanshaw wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 06:41 am (UTC)
The EU is a protectionist trading bloc which costs us hugh sums of money. It is scelerotic and lacks initiative. It has an ageing population and is being dragged down by cumbersome rules and regulations.Its share of world trade is declining yat it prevents us trading freely with the growth markets e.g China, India, Brazil. These are the dynamic economies of the future.
As the other 26 countries of the EU export far more to us than we do to them then if we leave they will be happy to negotiate a free trade agreement with us and we will also be able to go out and trade freely and without restraint with the rest of the world.
The Commonwealth is a vibrant bloc which we ignore at our peril.
Also it is clear that the EU is an atheist organisation , all reference to God was specifically excluded from the Rome/Maastricht/Lisbon Treaties even though the existence of a God is recognised by a clear majority of the EU's population and its religions , 3 of whom Christians, Muslims and Jews actually believe in the same God. EU institutions have also made life difficult for believers to follow their religion so the Reverend's support for an ungodly organisation is surprising.
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]peterhawkins1 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:22 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]zugzwang43 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 03:05 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]peterhawkins1 - Tuesday, 10 November 2009 at 09:26 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]jeanshaw - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:41 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]peterhawkins1 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:21 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]dixiedean99 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 10:49 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]jeanshaw - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:50 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]dixiedean99 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 07:30 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Trading Blocks - [info]xoixoi1 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 08:21 am (UTC) Expand
Selective repatriation and the Tories real agenda
[info]49niner wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 06:04 am (UTC)
So what powers would the Tories seek to repatriate? That is the nub of this thorny question. Surprise, surprise one of the top priorities is in employment law.

As far as I'm concerned the EU social chapter, which includes employee rights, has been a good thing, and has gone some way to redressing the balance of power between workers and employers. Successive Tory governments in the 1980s and 1990s deprived employees of important rights hard won over the years, and since signing up to the EU social chapter matters like working hours and holidays as well as protection for agency workers has got better.

The Tories don't like the EU because it doesn't accept their nasty, repressive right wing agenda. Their shadow cabinet is full of people from privileged backgrounds who just don't understand the experiences and realities of those who are less fortunate. Maybe they just don't care? Who knows?

For all its faults, I've always supported our membership of the EU and will continue to do so. For many years we have been fed scare stories and disinformation by the reactionary sections of the British Press and Establishment. The reason for this is because they are scared we might discover that people in the rest of Europe might just do things better than us, and their societies might just be fairer to all.

There are a lot of rich and powerful people who do well out of keeping us ignorant about Europe, and who use the cloak of "independence" as a means to keep us peasants in our place. Beware of these wolves in sheeps clothing.

The Soviet Union once used to talk of "socialism in one country" and kept its citizens isolated from the rest of the world. The Tory Europhobes want to isolate us from our nearest neighbours. Ask yourself why? And look carefully at their real agenda. For ordinary people, these Tories are very bad news.

So if you are an ordinary employee and value you your employment rights, or if you value the facility of taking your case to the European court to gain justice, then give these Eurosceptics a wide berth. They want to "repatriate" these rights, or rather take them away. They want to put you in your place, tugging the forelock as you go past. We've come a long way from that, so let's not risk turning back the clock.
Re: Selective repatriation and the Tories real agenda
[info]elevengoalposts wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 07:41 am (UTC)
To 49niner:
Your point can be well made without resort to "us" and "them"; it's peppered with "employee rights", "balance of power between workers and employers", "rights hard won", "employment rights", "tugging the forelock".

You continue with "nasty, repressive right wing agenda", "privileged backgrounds", "rich and powerful people ". Quite a number of Labour and LibDems MPs are effectively grandees, or didn't you notice them being parachuted, like the Arnhem raid, into safe seats, which they'd never heard of before their pre-selection?

The tone is straight out out of a time-warped "Socialist Weekly" rag. But who are you trying to convince?

It sounds like a Fred Kite (played by Peter Sellers) speech from the 1959 Boulting Brothers film, "I'm All Right Jack". Those "working" people don't exist anymore - many work under employment contracts where "terms and conditions" apply, not "employee rights" and "job descriptions".

Over in Australia, the mining industry employees are tremendously well-remunerated since they (mostly) dropped out of unions, productivity went through the roof and profitability drove a massive growth for the industry and the economy - note that Australia was one of the few not to go into recession.

The extreme socialist, French model would destroy the UK economy, just like the economy was destroyed in Britain by 1979. Those attitudes are long past being workable and the last vestiges of union millstones (like the Royal Mail) need to be stacked away.
Re: Selective repatriation and the Tories real agenda - [info]cm999 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:55 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Selective repatriation and the Tories real agenda - [info]2barrows - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Selective repatriation and the Tories real agenda - [info]frebastulous - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:14 pm (UTC) Expand
Eurosceptic Conservative MEPs are naive
[info]jeanshaw wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 06:28 am (UTC)
If Cameron becomes Prime Minister then the Eurosceptic MPs will like shame faced children march to his drum of further integration into the EU. We have been here before , at the last 4 elections the Eurosceptics including my own MP have made a great noise about how they are going to change Conservative policy . When the crunch came and they actually had to vote most ( half a dozen honourable exceptions ) went through the lobby as directed by the whips.
It is very convenient for Cameron to allow the sceptics their head at the moment since it helps to make voters believe he will actually do something for fear of a rebellion . However as his 3 promises are not worth the paper they are written on so once in power he may make a lot of noise but he can do nothing in practice.
Anyone who really wants to see a change in our relationship with the EU has to support UKIP.
Re: Eurosceptic Conservative MEPs are naive
[info]domoresti wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:02 pm (UTC)
"Anyone who really wants to see a change in our relationship with the EU has to support UKIP."

And then what, Jean? Once they have pulled the UK out of the EU, the rest of their strange policies will be introduced. I hope that people have read the full manifesto, but if they haven't:

http://www.ukip.org/content/ukip-policies

Their manifesto reads like a populist, centre-spread from the Daily Mail, but, maybe that's what people want.....

And just to add balance: The full text of Lisbon can be found here:

http://europa.eu/lisbon_treaty/full_text/index_en.htm

Of course it's difficult to fully understand, but find me a piece of legislation that isn't.
Re: Eurosceptic Conservative MEPs are naive - [info]jeanshaw - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:00 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Eurosceptic Conservative MEPs are naive - [info]dave1234567890 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:24 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Eurosceptic Conservative MEPs are naive - [info]jeanshaw - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:05 pm (UTC) Expand
The war is on ...
[info]kalvisjansons wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 06:43 am (UTC)
Hannan
[info]domoresti wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 08:38 am (UTC)
.....who wants to get rid rid of not only the EU, but the NHS.

If there was ever a rabid Atlanticist it's him....
Times are bad - let's attack the damn foreigners
[info]16tim16 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:07 am (UTC)
Yep, once again it's the fault of that lot over there. The once mighty UK is destitute and going nowhere, becoming more and more inconsequential in the world. It must have been those Johny Foreigners what done it.

Do you really think that the BNP and UKIP have any positive contribution to make?

Wake up! Get onboard with the rest of Europe. Let's be positive about what can be done, or we can continue to roam aound the fringes, moaning and complaining.

Re: Times are bad - let's attack the damn foreigners
[info]domoresti wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:24 pm (UTC)
Good post, Tim.

I think that people just don't understand that the previous prosperous years of Britain being an economic powerhouse was because of the EU, not in spite of it.

The current economic crisis originated in the states and, were it not for the EU block, Britain would be in a far, far worse state.

What always amazes me is the mind of the Atlanticist. The USA is not interested in the UK. In these global times, these are the choices:

1. Independent UK
Would never be able to exist. Has neither the political nor economic clout to go it alone.
2. Part Of EU
Not just that, but a leader within the EU. Mainly rejected by the British public for xenophobic, emotional reasons.
3. 51st State of the USA
And with less political clout than California or Texas, whose GDPs outstrip us.

Face it Britain - The future will never again be decided in London (unless with China or Russia's help).
Brussels or Washington?
Government is control
[info]scousekraut wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:16 am (UTC)
The more government there is the less freedom people have. Some government is necessary to provide a framework and structure but we have become overloaded with it. In reality we are largely a bunch of tax slaves working to pay off the debts that have accrued over hundreds of years to the banking cartel, which itself is behind the formation of the EU and centralisation of power.
This EU mess
[info]razzysmum wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:27 am (UTC)
This whole sorry business is not about Europe. Whether it is good or bad!
This is about BRITAIN!
This is about our government signing away our laws and our liberties!
We can be a part of Europe...we can respect their laws and work as a partner with them...
We can not accept that TWO Prime Ministers in a position of trust have turned their backs on the country they serve and the people they are/ were paid to protect. They trashed and disregarded hundreds of years of law and common law and imposed an unelected foreign power over us.
Maybe the EU is a good thing... but we should have a voice!
This was a democracy and we were proud to stand behind our government... proud to stand behind our Queen... they have betrayed the people of this country and the trust given to them.
That is Treason and betrayal of everything this country stands for
Re: This EU mess
[info]domoresti wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:15 pm (UTC)
Name one of your liberties that has been signed away to the EU.

You have more rights than ever before.
Re: This EU mess - [info]razzysmum - Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 02:16 pm (UTC) Expand
Fifth Columnists
[info]grounded00 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:39 am (UTC)
The absolute sacrifices of two world wars to protect our freedoms just signed away by a stroke of the pen, I feel empty.....
Re: Fifth Columnists
[info]arkybarky wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:56 am (UTC)
Forgive me for being obtuse, and I apologise in advance for responding to this particular post rather than asking the question in general, but exactly which freedoms has any UK citizen lost in respect of the EU?

Put simply, and in individual terms, what was it that we used to be able to do that we now cannot?
Re: Fifth Columnists - [info]domoresti - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:38 pm (UTC) Expand
More hot air...........
[info]lodger41 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 10:15 am (UTC)
When everyone with more than 5 live brain cells knows all too well how much the UK needs Europe and needs to fully engaged in the whole project,, it's no longer so amusing to hear yet more posturing, even talk of all out war against the EU, especially from those Euro-rich so called sceptics who have profitted most from UK membership. Naturally they spout such nonsense in a vain attempt to justify their political existence, knowing full well that they more than anyone would have cause to rue the day that of a UK withdrawal, not that such a thing is even remotely likely.
[info]alazarin wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 10:58 am (UTC)
The British people have 3 choices:

1) Get fully integrated into the EU as a group of equals with a powerful collective voice on the world stage and prosper.

2) Maintain the status quo: Be a subsidiary state in the US Imperium with no real input.

3) Go totally independent and sink like a stone.

Take your pick.
[info]nullius123 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC)
Enough of all this anti-EU invective.

The EU isn't self appointed. 27 heads of national government decide on the running of it. We are all free to vote for one of the parties that would withdraw from the EU - something the Lisbon treaty specifically allows for.

All this guff about "sovereignty" is mistaken. Lines on maps simply don't mean what they once did. We live in a very interconnected world. If one country asserts its "sovereignty" and cuts taxes, or embarks on some huge scheme, or whatever, the markets will soon punish that country's currency or government paper if the government's action is deemed unwise. A government's freedom to do as it will is a tiny, tiny fraction of what it once was, especially for a country in decline like Britain.

We have to decide what is more important - "sovereignty" or prosperity.

The EU needs to improve its democratic processes, to be sure, but the EU's defects do not make it our enemy. It needs fixing, not abandoning.


[info]razzysmum wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:41 am (UTC)
Europe needs to change?
So, how are you going to go about it when things suit other countries but not our own country?
Open borders for instance?
When the bigger, stronger countries want the plan and we are sinking under the weight of immigration and migration... how exactly are you going to 'change the situation' when you say yourself it takes 27 countries to agree a change!
It's not ALL about money and finance its about how we LIVE in this country when the EU rule every aspect of our lives.
If we wanted to quit in a boom we would lose a LOT... but we are NOT in a boom and we have already lost the biggest part of our assets... do you really think the EU will give them back just to make things easier for us?
After nearly 70 years on this planet I can tell you one thing... NO ONE will help anyone unless they have a payoff... we have to help OURSELVES and when you hit bottom as we very nearly have... don't hide behind the parapet and whine.. EU is good... Europe will get us out of this.
WE will get us out of it if there is enough spine in the country to stand up and DO it!
(no subject) - [info]nullius123 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:51 am (UTC) Expand
sovereignty - [info]lodger41 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: sovereignty - [info]nullius123 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 01:02 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]razzysmum wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 12:32 pm (UTC)
I haven't noticed any Commissioners telling me what to do this morning

Are you still asleep then?
Have you not noticed the the EU Human Rights Act has been imposing changes here since it was taken as our law by Saint Tony?
Have you not noticed that more criminals are getting shorter (ridiculous) sentences?
That the Political Correctness Brigade have make free speech something you think about before you open your mouth? Like a child of nine was escorted out of the playground and subjected to a scary experience by having her parents called to school and warned the child had called her best friend 'blacky' and both children accepted the friendly banter as a joke?
What planet do you live on, my friend?
[info]nullius123 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 01:10 pm (UTC)
Come on - have you ever heard of rhetorical fallacies? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies)

Britain has the highest proportion of its population behind bars of any country in Europe. Look it up.

As it happens, I think human rights are a pretty good idea, and I'm more than happy for them to be enshrined in our law. In case you've not noticed, our own government (Labour and Tory) only ever tries to take them away!

People do stupid things all the time - especially in the name of PC. The school incident you describe is one of them. What has this to do with the EU.

I think it is you who might like to wake up and check your facts.
(no subject) - [info]arkybarky - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 01:12 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]razzysmum - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 01:38 pm (UTC) Expand
Gains from EU membership - [info]lodger41 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:04 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Gains from EU membership - [info]razzysmum - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:10 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]arkybarky - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:20 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]razzysmum - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:48 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]arkybarky - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 03:19 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]razzysmum - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:20 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]arkybarky - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:54 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]domoresti - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:48 pm (UTC) Expand
What does David Cameron want?
[info]bob_idle wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:26 pm (UTC)
David Cameron should stop dithering and make up his mind what his policy is. Does he want to leave the EU or not? Once his mind is made up he should then sack MPs and MEPs who campaign against his policy.





[info]pixie_jade wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 02:58 pm (UTC)
we are better off out, Cameron knows his new not so cast-iron proposals will do nothing,-read the small print- is Europe likely to hand back any powers? NO. the EU does not even need to hold another treaty it has all the power it could ever want, our sovereignty is lost, the only way is OUT of the EU altogether
[info]domoresti wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 04:51 pm (UTC)
Hi pixie_jade.

You forgot to make an argument in your eloquent post.

"Better off out..." - Why?
"...It has all the power it could ever want.." - What powers are you referring to?
"...our sovereignty is lost..." - How and in what way and what is sovereignty in this day and age?
"the only way is OUT of the EU altogether " - Exactly what are you trying to escape from?
even more hot air from the 'sceptics' - [info]lodger41 - Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 05:29 pm (UTC) Expand
'All out war??'
[info]16tim16 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 07:36 pm (UTC)
This has to be the best bit - Tory eurosceptics threaten 'all out war'.

We seem to have forgotten that the EU has (up till now) put a stop to wars within its borders, and to most people involved in the last two world wars that's far more important than sovereignty.

Some threat from these pointless politicians. Go take a stress-less vacation.
Prime Minister In Waiting
[info]carriec45 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 07:40 pm (UTC)
The Tory party does not seem to really understand the mood of the people. Camerons complete turn about on a referendum will possibly cost you the election.

Many stauch conservative supporters will now vote UKIP or BNP.

The general feeling on the street is No Vote For Us then No Vote For Cameron.
Re: Prime Minister In Waiting
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 12:16 am (UTC)
As a staunch Tory supporter as well as a Eurosceptic, I will be voting Tory. With the country £200 billion in debt, massive unemployment and the pound on the floor and with the Lisbon Treaty already ratified, my priority is to ensure that this incompetent, lying government is removed as quickly as possible. A vote for UKIP or the BNP would only ensure another 5 years of Labour, something which I cannot contemplate. Europe can wait, the country's finances cannot.
EU and the top ten tips to stress less vacations
[info]sweetbriar12 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 07:52 pm (UTC)
tiankelan says it all, take a break from all the political ranting of well heeled politicians. The UK doesn't know what it wants, doesn't know where it has been, doesn't know where it is headed (other than Afghanistan) and apparently doesn't know its arse from it's elbow. How the mighty Great Britain has fallen down in the world without a shot being fired by even one subject!
At least Betty and Phil still dine on cake and cucumber sandwiches at afternoon tea, and are driven around in German cars......back to the family roots!
My opinion
[info]razzysmum wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:30 pm (UTC)
Looking through some of these posts it becomes obvious many do not give a shite for Britain. That is fine… it’s your opinion and you are entitled to it. For you the great EU is your saviour and I truly hope it never disappoints you.
I honour your opinion… I hope you will honour mine.
You see, I was born into a country that knew patriotism… that is love of country if you have never come across the word…. It was a country where you were taught respect and had to work to get what you wanted and if you didn’t get everything then you worked until you could afford the things you didn’t have.
Over the years I have seen the rise of the unions that demanded more money for less work. The destruction of the unions and the selling off of utilities to pull the economy back, followed by the signing of treaties that sold our history and birthright. The rise of Tony Blair, the beginning of the benefit dependency making it possible for those often too lazy to work to be ‘kept’ by the rest who worked and paid tax.
The mass immigration that turned many areas of our cities into no-go areas and please don’t say it was always like that because I was born and raised in the poor backstreets of our second city and for all it’s imperfections it was far from a no-go.
I look round now and I don’t recognise my country…. I don’t recognise the young people who drink until they vomit in the street… the gangs who beat up and sometimes kill innocent people… the school kids who bully without mercy and mouth a teacher trying to educate them. I don’t recognise a government and a monarch who sell my country to a foreign power without the courtesy and honour to even allow the people to have a say. Most of all I do not recognise a Prime Minister who can destroy our economy with a ‘scorched earth’ policy for no other reason than to render it beyond repair for the next government to take over.
But if you think that is acceptable then that’s fine…. I wish you well of it… I’ve had most of my time so you are the ones who have to live with it.
Loss of freedom in the EU
[info]richard213 wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 09:54 pm (UTC)
Domoresti asks what freedom have been lost within the EU. How about}
1- My freedom to decide, with my boss how many hours a week I work, without applying for permission to Nanny EU
2-The British Governments ability to protect public services, e,g the Post Office, if it wants to.
3- My wish to have an English Parliament, not a regionalised England as planned by the EU.
4- The British Governments ability to ensure that the Utilities remain in British hands. Wonder why EDF still exists?
Re: Loss of freedom in the EU
[info]bob_idle wrote:
Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 11:43 pm (UTC)
1. Or your boss tells you how many hours you must work and you nod submissively with no protection from the law

2. The British government pressed the EU to introduce so-called competition in postal services

3. Nothing to do with the EU. Scotland has it's own parliament so could England if enough English people wanted one.

4. It was not the EU that forced the British to sell off their utilities into the private sector

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date