Oscar Pistorius trial: Judge to deliver murder verdict on 11 September
For a trial that long before it even started has seemed to be more about television drama than justice for a dead young woman, it will come as little surprise that its final act is likely to be billed as 9/11 Judgement Day.
It will be on September 11th, almost six and a half months after the trial began and nineteen months after Oscar Pistorius shot and killed his girlfriend, that he will finally learn his fate.
The trial proper ended yesterday, with the athlete’s now world famous defence counsel Barry Roux claiming his client should never have been tried for murder, but for culpable homicide, and that the undisputed facts of the case support only Oscar Pistorius’s version of events and no one else’s - that he mistook his girlfriend for an intruder, and in startled panic, fearing for his life, shot and killed her through the bathroom door.
The athlete’s uncle Arnold said afterwards that his defence team had “done more than enough” and that “I want him back in the Olympics.”
Mr Pistorius, he argued, was neither liable nor negligent for the killing, which came as a consequence of an “involuntary reflexive response”, as he stood with his gun pointed at the locked toilet cubicle, and heard a noise inside.
“He is trained as an athlete, to react to a sound,” Mr Roux said. “And he’s standing there, with his finger on the trigger.
“If I were to stand behind him [in such a situation], his finger on the trigger, and he is in a fearful state, and I clap my hands, I am very happy to argue that on some occasion, he may pull the trigger.”
The prosecution have sought to tear apart the athlete’s version of events, claiming that he could have attempted to arouse Ms Steenkamp, who he wrongly imagined to be in the bed, and exited the house to safety.
But in arming himself and moving in to the bathroom, there was pre-planning involved, and by shooting in to the toilet, he knew he would kill whoever was in there, an act of murder, whether he knew it to be Reeva or not, which Pistorius does not accept.
Citing earlier expect testimony, Mr Roux argued: “Because Oscar Pistorius grew up without legs, his fight or flight danger was skewed. It led to an exaggerated fight response.
“You are a little boy without legs, you experience daily, the disability and the effect of this. You experience, daily, that you cannot run away.
“You do not have a flight response.
“We all know we have three primal responses, freeze, flight or fight. It is well known that with a disability, over time, you get an exaggerated fight response.”
The times of phone calls made by Pistorius and his neighbours validates his version of events, and his alone. It is Mr Pistorius’s version of events the shots that killed Ms Steenkamp were fired at 3.12am, and the noises the state claim were the fateful gunshots were in fact the sound of the athlete seeking to break down the toilet door with a cricket bat.
The state has offered no explanation for what those earlier sounds were, and according to its version of events, Mr Pistorius would have had to screamed for help, before he had shot Ms Steenkamp.
“Why would he shout Help! Help! Help! while Ms Steenkamp still alive?” Mr Roux asked.
The case, he said, would come down to that short time, a minute or thirty seconds, when he stood outside the bathroom door. There was a case to make, he suggested, that Mr Pistorius could have been negligent in not trying harder to establish Ms Steenkamp’s whereabouts, but in that case “the charge should be culpable homicide, not murder.”
“You have all the facts you have to determine. We have made our submissions. He was not negligent,” he said.
“It comes down to those 20 seconds in the accused’s life where he was standing at the entrance to the bathroom.”
What happened in those twenty seconds, Judge Thokozile Masipa has just over a month to decide.
John Moore starred in Coca Cola and Morrisons adverts
Top Gear presenter is no stranger to foot-in-mouth controversy
New essay by JK Rowling went live on Pottermore site this morning
Former boxer recalls incident when he was seven years old
Charlie Sheen could be set to revive his role as a hedonistic womaniser
Review: Mike Leigh's biopic is a rambling, rich character study
Want to ward off (or welcome) trick-or-treaters? Here's how
- 1 'Nasa Confirms Six Days of Darkness in December': No, they don't - it's a hoax
- 3 Topshop at centre of row over body image as 'shocking' skinny mannequin photo goes viral
'Nasa Confirms Six Days of Darkness in December': No, they don't - it's a hoax
Canadian actor punched in face after 'Islamophobia' experiment goes wrong in wake of Ottawa shooting
Halloween 2014: From the Screaming Man of Pluckley to the 'White Lady' of the Tower of London - Britain's 20 most haunted places
Russian politician says Apple CEO Tim Cook should be 'banned' from country after coming out as gay
Kentucky gang rape: 15-year-old boy left in critical condition after sexual attack by group at party
Pope Francis declares evolution and Big Bang theory are real and God is not 'a magician with a magic wand'
Huge surge in Ukip support after EU funding row, according to new poll
Ukip ‘exploiting grooming scandal’ to secure party’s first police chief
Nigel Farage: 'There’s nothing wrong with white people blacking up'
Maureen Lipman says 'she can't vote Labour while Ed Miliband is leader'
Muslims, immigration and teenage pregnancy: British people are ignorant about almost everything
£35000 - £40000 Per Annum plus excellent benefits: Clearwater People Solutions...
£20000 - £40000 per annum: Randstad Education Plymouth: Randstad Education Ltd...
£85 - £120 per day: Randstad Education Preston: Randstad Education is urgently...
£20000 - £45000 per annum: Randstad Education Plymouth: Randstad Education Ltd...