Obama set to block release of US atrocity photos
Pictures showing abuse of prisoners 'could put American troops in danger'
Thursday 14 May 2009
Latest in Americas
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
In an abrupt change of mind, President Barack Obama is now seeking to block the release of more than 40 photos showing US personnel abusing prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan, arguing that their publication could endanger American troops on duty in the two countries.
The Pentagon had been preparing to release the pictures within the next fortnight, in compliance with a federal appeals court ruling in a case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. They were scheduled to be made public in two batches, of 21 and 23 images, with the likelihood of more to follow.
Yesterday, however, White House officials indicated that the President had had second thoughts, largely at the urging of Defence Secretary Robert Gates, and other senior military commanders including General David Petraeus, the former commander in Iraq, and his successor General Ray Odierno, as well as General David McKiernan, the top general in Afghanistan. General McKiernan was removed from that post earlier this week by Mr Gates, for reasons unconnected to the photos.
The commanders told Mr Obama the release of the photos could inflame opinion against the US and its soldiers across the Arab and Muslim world – much as the infamous pictures from Abu Ghraib prison did when they were first disclosed in the spring of 2004. "Particularly in Afghanistan, this is the last thing they need," a Pentagon official said.
Originally Mr Obama had supported releasing the images, as a follow-up to the four Justice Department memos setting out in detail the "enhanced interrogation techniques" widely criticised as torture, that were permissible for use on suspected terrorists and which were made public last month.
The President would, his aides say, "be the last to excuse the actions depicted" in the photos, taken between 2003 and 2006, some of them at Abu Ghraib. But he now believes their publication would do more harm than good. The next legal steps were not immediately clear, and it is possible the dispute will end up in the Supreme Court.
In its original case, the ACLU said disclosure of the photos was "critical" for helping people understand the scope and scale of prisoner abuse, and bringing those who had authorised such abuse to account. The appeals court agreed, saying the public interest of releasing the photos outweighed the risk of endangering the American military or violating detainees' privacy.
Last night the civil rights group criticised the president's decision, as "profoundly inconsistent with the promise of transparency that President Obama has made time after time".
- 1 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 2 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 3 No secularism please, we're British
- 4 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 5 Police confiscate passport from Brooks' assistant
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 1 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 4 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Police confiscate passport from Brooks' assistant
- 7 Nauru and Abkhazia: One is a destitute microstate marooned in the South Pacific, the other is a disputed former Soviet Republic 13,000km away, so why are they so keen to be friends?
- 8 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British
Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
New Arsenal face an old question of credibility in San Siro




Comments