World

Rain (AM and PM) 8° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Could you really stomach Blair being EU president?

As Cherie admits to doubts about the decision to go to war with Iraq, Tony Blair's European support is beginning to falter

By Jane Merrick

Europe has to decide whether to think big or behave small. Big means Blair

If Tony Blair is voted in as EU president he will add £247,000 a year to his earnings. But Angela Merkel, Germany's Chancellor, is said to be less enthusiastic than she was about his candidacy

Many hold him responsible for "war crimes" in Iraq, while others think he is only interested in piling up a vast fortune from speaking engagements and property. But there are still some in Europe who believe Tony Blair should be anointed as the first President of the EU this month. Last week, Mr Blair was in Canada posing for pictures at £180 a time. On Friday, he attended the commemoration at St Paul's for the soldiers who died in the Iraq war. This Tuesday, he will face more raw anger from families of soldiers when the first independent and public inquiry into the war begins in London.

The former prime minister will come under the scrutiny of the Chilcot Inquiry into the six-year campaign as he lobbies for votes in Europe to be the EU's first president. To make matters worse, his wife Cherie yesterday said the Iraq war was a "51-49" decision, adding that Mr Blair had been very good at "convincing everybody else that it was a 70-30 decision".

As emotions continued to run high at home, doubts surfaced in mainland Europe that enough of the 27 member states would have the stomach to choose Mr Blair as their president – with a salary of £247,000.

Sir John Chilcot, who is chairing the inquiry, will open the hearings on Tuesday by taking evidence from soldiers' families, including those of the 179 troops who died in the war. Mr Blair will give evidence at a later date – when he is expected to find his controversial decision to wage a war in the face of widespread opposition at home laid bare.

It follows the angry confrontation Mr Blair experienced at the commemoration at St Paul's on Friday, when the father of one dead soldier refused to shake his hand because he had "my son's blood on your hands".

Yesterday, Peter Brierley, whose son Shaun died in March 2003 in the run-up to the invasion, said that Mr Blair "went white" when he refused to shake his hand.

The powerful and grief-stricken criticism from Mr Brierley highlights how, nearly seven years on from the invasion, Mr Blair cannot escape his role in the Iraq war which also cost the lives of tens of thousands of civilians.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, speaking at the service, also attacked Mr Blair for failing to consider the human cost of his decisions. And, in a sign that he recognises that he is a toxic and controversial figure across Europe because of Iraq, Mr Blair has deliberately played down his candidacy. His office does not even confirm that he is in the running.

A summit to agree on the appointment will be held at the end of this month – when the Chilcot hearings will be well under way. If there is no agreement, there is another chance in December to choose a president.

It emerged last night that despite President Nicolas Sarkozy of France coming round to the idea of a Blair presidency, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, who was expected to follow suit, is now believed to prefer the candidacy of Jan Peter Balkenende, the Dutch Prime Minister.

A diplomatic source said Ms Merkel would not actively prevent Mr Blair becoming EU president if there was a growing consensus for his candidacy, but she thinks Mr Balkenende is a "good candidate". Poland and Spain are also wary of Mr Blair becoming president. Other possible candidates include former Spanish premier Felipe Gonzalez and the ex-Finnish premier, Paavo Lipponen. The total package for the post is estimated at £3.5m over two consecutive terms of two and a half years, including salary, accommodation and expenses. Mr Blair already costs British taxpayers £2m for security.

A BPIX poll for the Daily Mail found that 47 per cent of Britons are opposed to Mr Blair becoming president, while 35 per cent would support him.

The Polish President yesterday ratified the Lisbon Treaty, the reform charter that created the post of president of the European Council of heads of state (or EU president). The Czech Republic alone is still to ratify the treaty.

Further details of the families appearing before the Chilcot Inquiry had not been released by last night.

Do you think Tony Blair deserves to become the first President of the European Union? Or should another candidate fill this handsomely rewarded post? Let us know at: sundayletters@independent.co.uk

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
I do know what to think...
[info]brazil2009 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 12:12 am (UTC)
Not him, please, not him.
Re: I do know what to think...
[info]longon007 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:05 pm (UTC)


Indeed. Having scanned the posts so far, not too many think this is a great idea...
Re: I do know what to think... - [info]richleau - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:51 pm (UTC) Expand
President Blair
[info]jimfred wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 12:31 am (UTC)
Look on the bright side,i will mean we will never get a vote in the eurovision song contest again.
Re: President Blair
[info]ratcatcher911 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:53 pm (UTC)
Hahahahahaha! Genius!
mass murderer
[info]panic2009 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 01:39 am (UTC)
there are many reasons this man should not get the post. 1.3 million of them in fact. dead iraqis that is. this man should be in jail
LETS START SEARCHING
[info]hugogg wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:05 pm (UTC)
Everyone complains about the democratic deficit but nobody tries to use these rare opportunities to show it. Why doesn't The Independent start a campaign to find THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE? I'm sure there are other Newspapers across Europe that could collaborate on that search. Then, when the politicians elect some guy like Blair, not only will everybody know the people don't want him but they will know WHO the people of Europe would like INSTEAD. The pressure from that kind of mass opinion would force The EU to make the presidential selection more democratic at the next Constitutional junction. Don't just bitch and whine, TELL THEM WHAT/WHO you want.
.
Who is the most loved/respected/trusted person in Europe? That is the question. I can see Professor Stephen W. Hawking being a great candidate, in terms of what it would say about Europe and our values (not just science but toward disability too), etc. There are many Literature Nobel winners in this Continent, there are people like Bono (IRL), there are people like Jose Saramago (POR), Billy Connolly (SCO), David Hasselhoff (GER), hahaha. No, seriously.
.
https://citizenmundi.wordpress.com/
.
New Image for the EU
[info]boeticia wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 02:42 am (UTC)
The EU and Europe need a fresh breeze to clear the stale air that has been dulling minds lately as to which direction should be taken. There's no lack of competent candidates, therefore, no need to
abide by a politician who's been around too often and too long. The EU needs a new man, or woman
as president to lead the way.
Tiny, go away
[info]np57np wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 02:54 am (UTC)
This socialist walks out of office with a 6 million pound property portfolio, and accuses the Tories of being toffs.
He presided over our financial ruin.
He's a game show host with a smile.
Go away Tony, we're sick of you.
(no subject) - [info] - Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 03:21 am (UTC)
Re: ghsfghsfghsfdzd
[info]kd001 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:34 am (UTC)
why is this allowed?
Smoke and Mirrors
[info]dodoze wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:39 am (UTC)
Irrespective of the outcome, that such as Bliar can be seriously considered for the unelected position of EU President illustrates the democratic deficit at the heart of the EU. The Lisbon Treaty is a cynical act of political sleight-of-hand which has transformed the EU Constitution authored by Giscard d'Estaing into a form which has permitted political leaders to wriggle out of commitments to referenda. The focus on a prospective Presidency for a former UK Prime Minister (who should be on trial for his international crimes) diverts attention from what has really happened in the EU or on how the Irish people have been duped. Having roundly rejected the Treaty in 2008, the Irish have been persuaded by the combination of hollow promises, unenforceable safeguards, economic catastrophe and an apparently bottomless pot of money to finance the campaign for a "yes" vote, to overturn their decision on precisely the same text of Treaty which they rejected last year. And which is virtually unchanged from the constitution rejected by the voters of France and Holland in referenda. The implications and powers of the Treaty have never been made clear to the people of Britain but enshrine the dilution of democracy and a further distancing of power from the peoples of the EU.
Tony Blair or Balkende?
[info]mannygoldstein wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 04:42 am (UTC)
Neither are wanted, the potential role of Presidentof the EU should not be a gift of a political elite but a genuine appointment!

Recent revelations in the Netherlands of groper Balkende make sure that his appointment would be a disaster, while the Blair history ensure the same!
I see from....
[info]thisanthat wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 06:04 am (UTC)
the above icon, Bliars halo has been replaced by a few stars? One hopes this is symbolic in as much as this is what the war mongering cretin will see inside his head when justice cacthes up with him and kicks his evil arse for all the ills he has brought to this world!!!!
please get the name right
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 06:47 am (UTC)
Tony B Liar
No Way!
[info]over325one wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 06:53 am (UTC)
How could he even be considered for the post? The EU needs to reconsider its methods of electing a leader. Would they consider Berlasconi for the post who is not even on a par with Blair for all the wrong things.
Scrape the soles
[info]richard_hode wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 07:30 am (UTC)
Please, please send this insatiable man home to rest on his laurels, such as they are. Begone, clinging barnacle on the ship of state! Begone, Jack-in-the-Box who keeps popping up like a whack-a-mole. You have done enough, quite enough, thank you very much. How can we miss you if you don't go away? Go already, please, it's long overdue.
Blair for EuropeanPresdent - God Forbid!
[info]prevessinman wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 07:34 am (UTC)
There must surely be a politician in Europe who does not have the reputation of being a greedy, glib, war-mongering liar. As a European citizen born in the UK and living in France, Iwould be ashamed to be represented by this man.
private club
[info]ebbi581 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 07:39 am (UTC)
do the people who "select" the president of eu read these comments??? do they care how much hate there is for tony bliar? do they care what people think about this charlatan?? or is it just a private club !!!!
Blair as EU President
[info]mtbagley wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 07:58 am (UTC)
My opinion : Anybody (within reason) BUT Blair.

How is he even in the running? What has he done to merit even being considered?

mtb
Blair for Eu President
[info]brush5 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:01 am (UTC)
Blair is Eu "President" will be the obscene head on a loathsome body. The EU deserves Blair, it will be bad for both of them.
Blair turned his back on Europe in 2003
[info]peteloud wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
Blair turned his back on Europe in 2003 when he let himself and the Briish troops become American puppets. Had he acted differently he could have unified Europe and helped make the EU a more effective political, military and economic unit. His actions were anti-Europe and pro-America. He is not the right person for the job.

Other Europeans should not trust Blair to have any form of control over their country.
This time he will be the poodle of the Americans in Europe.
[info]stanleycorbett wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:09 am (UTC)



This time he will be the poodle of the Americans in Europe.
Blair as EU President is an utterly disgusting idea
[info]whostoletyke wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:17 am (UTC)
Quite apart from what Blair did in Iraq to appease America in its witch-hunt following 9/11, Blair's New Labour has transformed Britain - for the worse! We now have the most controlled state outside of former East Germany or modern day Burma or North Korea. We lock people up without trial. We have 4.2 million surveillance cameras and there are more to come, probably next in school classrooms, too. Then there's the assumption that everyone is guilty until, grudgingly, found innocent. Take the latest of these, the Vetting and Barring scheme that assumes all volunteers who work with children are latent paedophiles unless they have a piece of paper to say they're not. 11 million people, a quarter of the adult population, no less! And despite this, there are STILL a few idiots left who continue to vote Labour. Over DNA retention, the New Labour government just sticks up two fingers in the direction of the European Court of Human Rights which found Britain's policy here was illegal as it breaches human rights. Everywhere you look across Britain you see signs of a broken society, a them and us society, a society with still a massive gulf between rich and poor, and who presided over all this during the past 12 years? The same bloke who now wants to preside over the 500 million people in the EU! It is ridiculous, unconscionable. Think of any word you like and there won't be a dictionary large enough to condemn Tony Blair and what he has wrought.
War Criminal for President
[info]the_real_omen wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:31 am (UTC)
As per usual, the idea that the everyday person has a choice to select anything to do with politics is long dead. The Rothschilds, Rockefellers and their cabal are the true policy makers for UK and USA plc. The agenda is to bring the EU under their control and has been since the inception of the EU. The boy Blair is their agent and the quicker people understand the dynamics of what is going on, maybe they will choose a different outcome. True 'democracy' has never existed, nor will it. People need to decide whether they wish to be enslaved to the designs of this cabal in the hope that it is benign, or begin to fight. Your time is quickly running out.
Screaming god-botherer
[info]simon_gardner wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:47 am (UTC)
Quite apart from
(a) his crimes over the Iraq war opposed by the rest of the EU;
(b) he is from a non-Euro-zone country;
(c) he is from a country that could very easily secede from the EU;
Blair has become a screaming god-botherer of the most offensive kind.

Blair is quite unsuitable to become EU President.
Europe must be short of sane politicians.
[info]kisakhani wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 09:52 am (UTC)
Last time a jester made him the chairperson of Middle East Peace Committee to solve the Palestinian issue and so far nothing concrete has resulted. Now you want him to become the President of EU? Could anyone amongst you please suggest George W Bush become the Secretary General of United Nations and Dick Cheney head NATO. We surely will stomach anything since we have been doing that since the beginning of this Millennium.
Re: Europe must be short of sane politicians.
[info]corporeal_v001 wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:22 am (UTC)

The middle east peace committee is an American inititive, so what were you expecting? Results?
The whole western international political system is being manipulated by certain powerful and influencial groups. When this ends, we will see changes. The demise of the dollar seems to be a sign for changes to come.
Do not remove stake while in coffin............
[info]rassendyl wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
President of the EU? Not even the EU's Dog Catcher! It'll never happen though. Germany and France will see to that.
Blair as President.
[info]superkeith wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 10:23 am (UTC)
I think there is a widespread suspicion that Blair was responsible for a deception around the dodgy dossier and also responsible for the demise of Dr Kelly.From daily conversations I cannot remember an ex Prime Minister who was so despised by so many from every side of the political spectrum including surprisingly the religious, one of whom I heard describe Blair as a whited sepulchre. The essential problem that many UK electors have with the EU, apart from the fact that they believe it to be corrupt, is that it is undemocratic and unaccountable and a Blair Presidency would only reinforce this view.
Overwhelmingly .....;NO!!
[info]smarttog wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC)
It sickens me to see Tony Blair is once again promoting himself.

One million people marched through London and where ignored. The Archbishop of Canterbury got it exactly right in his address.

On his watch our respected and courageous armed forces where sent to fight, what many believe to be an illegal war.

Allegations of this counties involvement in torture emerged, with the suspected facillitation of the disgusting, so called rendition flights.

Until an enquiry has been completed Tony Blair should not be considered for any office at all..

Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date