Irish voters back Lisbon... but what does the treaty actually mean?

Mary Dejevsky
Sunday 04 October 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Irish voters yesterday delivered a resounding endorsement of the Lisbon Treaty, causing waves of relief and celebration in Brussels and Dublin about the future of the EU and of the Irish government.

The referendum produced a vote of two-thirds in favour of the treaty, a reversal of last year's poll which rejected it. So, what is the Lisbon Treaty?

* It is a charter designed to streamline existing EU treaties and was agreed in Lisbon in October 2007.

* It enacts many reforms contained in the EU constitution of 2004, which was thrown out by French and Dutch voters in 2005.

* Ireland was the only EU country to hold a referendum on Lisbon.

* The treaty creates for the first time a permanent EU president and foreign affairs chief.

* It will streamline the European Commission from 2014.

* Phased in between 2014 and 2017 will be a distribution of voting rights – a qualified majority voting system giving 55 per cent of member states greater power over the rest.

* The treaty removes some national vetoes.

* There will be new powers for the European Commission, European Parliament and the European Court of Justice.

* It creates a charter of fundamental rights – from which the UK can opt out.

* The UK retains the right to opt out of policies on justice and home affairs. It also keeps control of national foreign and security policy.

* Unlike the constitution, the treaty does not contain reference to an EU flag, anthem or motto.

* The Czech Republic and Poland are the two remaining EU countries out of 27 still to ratify the treaty.

* Poland is expected to sign this month. The Czech government said yesterday it would ratify by the end of the year.

* The president and foreign affairs chief were expected to be approved later this month. But, because of the Czech delay, they will either be agreed in a meeting in December or in 2010.

* The president would serve a two-and-a-half-year term. He or she would be a figurehead for Europe and "ensure the external reputation" of the EU.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in