The Queen addressed the international community of Commonwealth nations on Monday, declaring “inclusivity” as the theme of 2016 across the former territories of the British Empire.
The irony of working to combat oppression around the world through the concept of a Commonwealth, the ghost of an imperial system implemented through a litany of brutal atrocities, has been noted.
At a star-studded event at Westminster Abbey in London, dignitaries from the 53-nation group came together to hear the Queen's message about “being inclusive and accepting diversity… wherever we live in the Commonwealth”.
In the programme for the service, the Queen said: “Today, and in the year ahead, the theme 'An Inclusive Commonwealth' is an inspiration for us all. Let us give it practical effect by supporting those in need and those who feel excluded in all walks of life. By doing so, we will continue to build a truly representative Commonwealth community.”
Here are seven Commonwealth members who have failed to live up to those ideals.
Uganda’s president Yoweri Museveni extended his 30-year rule when the results of its recent elections were announced on 20 February – while his opponent was being held under house arrest.
The Independent went on patrol with a group of unpaid vigilante “preventers”, who critics say were used as an unofficial army of enforcers to stamp out any resistance against the incumbent leader.
The criminalisation of homosexuality – for the most part a direct result of colonialism in Africa – is evident particularly clearly in Uganda. While its infamous Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA) was nullified early last year, a new bill targeting the LGBT community – but with a less offensive title – is set to come into law.
The Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative was founded in 1987 in a bid to use the influence of the Commonwealth ideal to shine a light on the human rights abuses of individual states.
In its statement marking Commonwealth Day 2016, the organisation has chosen to highlight Sri Lanka and its “sharp turn towards authoritarianism” as the most pressing concern for the wider group.
The humanitarian crisis in the country after the cessation of armed conflict in 2009 “damages Commonwealth credibility”, the CHRI said.
“Violations and abuses that have occurred in Sri Lanka include indiscriminate shelling, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, harrowing accounts of torture and sexual violence, recruitment of children and other grave crimes,” it said, quoting the UN HRC.
In its report on The State of the World’s Human Rights, released late last month, Amnesty International raised 10 key examples of countries where there have been attacks on the rights of individuals perpetrated on a national scale.
They included two current Commonwealth nations – Kenya and Pakistan – as well as The Gambia, a member until very recently when it withdrew citing “neo-colonialism”.
Attacks on human rights around the world
Attacks on human rights around the world
Escalating crackdown against human rights activists including mass arrests of lawyers and a series of sweeping laws in the name of ‘national security’.Picture: A protest in Hong Kong last July following the arrest of at least 50 Chinese human rights lawyers and activists
The arrest of thousands, including peaceful critics, in a ruthless crackdown in the name of national security, the prolonged detention of hundreds without charge or trial and the sentencing of hundreds of others to death.
Torture, enforced disappearances and the criminalisation of LGBTI people; and utter refusal to co-operate with the UN and regional human rights mechanisms on issues including freedom of expression, enforced disappearance and the death penalty.Picture: Gambia's President, Yahya Jammeh
Sealing off its borders to thousands of refugees in dire need; and obstructing collective regional attempts to help them.
Maintaining its military blockade of Gaza and therefore collective punishment of the 1.8 million inhabitants there, as well as failing, like Palestine, to comply with a UN call to conduct credible investigations into war crimes committed during the 2014 Gaza conflict.
Extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances and discrimination against refugees in its counter-terrorism operations; and attempts to undermine the International Criminal Court and its ability to pursue justice.Picture: Policemen arrest people protesting the passing of a controversial counter-terrorism legislation
The severe human rights failings of its response to the horrific Peshawar school massacre including its relentless use of the death penalty; and its policy on international NGOs giving authorities the power to monitor them and close them down if they are considered to be “against the interests” of the country.
Repressive use of vague national security and anti-extremism legislation and its concerted attempts to silence civil society in the country; its shameful refusal to acknowledge civilian killings in Syria and its callous moves to block Security Council action on Syria.
9/10 Saudi Arabia
Brutally cracking down on those who dared to advocate reform or criticise the authorities; and committing war crimes in the bombing campaign it has led in Yemen (pictured) while obstructing the establishment of a UN-led inquiry into violations by all sides in the conflict.
Killing thousands of civilians in direct and indiscriminate attacks with barrel bombs and other weaponry and through acts of torture in detention; and enforcing lengthy sieges of civilian areas, blocking international aid from reaching starving civilians.Source: Amnesty International
In Kenya, Amnesty reported extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances and discrimination against refugees under the umbrella of the government’s counter-terrorism operations against the al-Shabaab militant group.
It also said there had been concerted attempts to undermine the International Criminal Court and its ability to pursue justice.
Trinidad & Tobago
Governed by Britain for more than 160 years until it obtained independence in 1962, Trinidad and Tobago has become the third-wealthiest nation in the Americas per capita due to its vast reserves of oil and natural gas.
Yet while it is now a flourishing republic, the country’s anti-LGBT laws remain stuck in the colonial era.
So-called “buggery laws”, brought in under British rule, carry a 25-year prison term for consensual anal sex between two men. Current immigration laws also bar “undesirables” from entering the country in the first place – a list that includes homosexuals, prostitutes and other marginalised groups.
It is reported that these laws often go unenforced, and public opinion remains divided on the issue of gay rights – as this scathing comment article, run by the Trinidad Express after the US Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage, shows.
The CHRI says it carried out a fact-finding mission to the Maldives in November last year, and found the country in “clear violation” with the fundamental values of the Commonwealth.
Among other issues, it found “a flagrant disregard to the rule of law, human rights and good governance”, as well as warning that the country represents “a fertile recruitment ground for jihadist fighters in Iraq and Syria”.
“Radicalised elements continuously harass and attack individuals perceived to be secular, unorthodox or “un-Islamic” with impunity, as government tolerates instead of punishes these perpetrators,” it said, adding that the rise of ultra-conservative groups “severely undermines advancement of women’s rights and gender equality”.
The lands which now make up Malaysia were dominated by Britain until the modern country was formed in 1963.
Since then, it has experienced growing economic prosperity – but it has made headlines this week after two Australian journalists were detained for attempting to question the Prime Minister Najib Razak.
The issue of press freedom in Malaysia appears to be coming to a head, but has been a growing concern for some time. In its statement on Human Rights Day last year, the CHRI said: “We stand with the journalists and activists harassed and prosecuted for the legitimate exercise of their freedoms of speech and assembly in Malaysia.”
England (and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland)
In his message marking Commonwealth Day, David Cameron said the organisation was one of the ways "we amplify Britain's influence in the world".
He said: "It is by being a member of strong networks and international organisations such as the Commonwealth, the UN Security Council, the EU, Nato and G8 that we amplify Britain's influence in the world.
"As the only country to belong to all of these organisations, we have a unique opportunity to make our voice heard and our partners value the role we can play in bringing together these different networks, so we all work together to deliver greater security and prosperity for our citizens."
As can be seen from the examples of countries above, however, it is at least partly because of Britain's effort to "influence" the world in the past two hundred years that so many issues regarding inclusivity have arisen.