Editor-At-Large: David Davis is the new voice of the people
The maverick Tory is more in tune with popular feeling than 'insiders' think
Sunday, 15 June 2008
Is David Davis a champion of the people or a shameless self-publicist? Many in the Westminster village quickly dismissed his resignation over the Commons' vote on the detention of suspects for 42 days as a meaningless gesture, but outside the hothouse atmosphere of party politics, there's been a more considered response.
Tune in to the radio (for example, FiveLive's Friday morning phone-in, or yesterday's Any Answers), browse the internet and eavesdrop in pubs and canteens and you get the impression that he's really touched a nerve. People are admitting that, even though they've never thought of voting Tory, they agree with Mr Davis: in a slow but unstoppable process the Government has sacrificed too much of our individual liberty in the name of reducing petty crime and safeguarding national security. The Prime Minister, grateful for the diversion from his own troubles, has denounced Davis's action as a farce, and the pantomime theme is reinforced by the will-he, won't-he threat of Kelvin MacKenzie standing in the forthcoming by-election.
This is not a simple scenario that might split the Tories at a time when Labour is in the doldrums and needs all the help it can get. Mr Davis has made a stand that resonates with a lot of ordinary people. Opinion polls may show that the majority of voters support extending the period of time terror suspects can be detained without trial – but I'm not entirely convinced that this means we want to have laws of detention that are unparalleled elsewhere in Europe or America. Are we really going to prevent young men and women blowing themselves up with this new law? Hardly. As for infringing our liberty, who demanded ID cards and claimed they were essential for security reasons? Not voters. Who demanded 42 days' detention without charges? Not members of the public. Who insisted that the NHS puts all our personal details on one database, when every computer system installed by government has gone over budget and doesn't work properly? Not the people who actually pay for the NHS.
We go about our daily lives under more surveillance than any other civilised country, and what evidence is there that all the CCTV cameras make any difference to crime? Not a lot. Our personal details are stored on deficient computer systems, with the result that vast amounts of confidential information are routinely lost by civil servants, not members of the public. And it wasn't members of the public who left confidential documents about the war against terror, marked "secret", on a train recently, was it?
Mr Davis may not be the martyr that insiders have predicted, but rather the spokesman for a new populist movement.
Harmless rubber sandal or burning issue?
Another week, another cancer scare – don't you feel sometimes that women were put on the planet so they could attract life-threatening diseases? It used to be what we ate, whether we smoked, how much we drank. Now it's what we wear. The humble flip-flop is the latest danger we have to avoid at all cost. According to surgeons, wearing footwear that leaves the thin skin on the top of our feet exposed to the sun increases the risk of skin cancer.
I find flip-flops toxic for another reason altogether – I've travelled to deserted beaches from Papua New Guinea to Uruguay, and what litters their shores? Single, discarded, broken flip-flops. A major pollutant, right up there with mineral water bottles.
My little piece of YSL magic
Last Thursday, Yves Saint Laurent's ashes were scattered over the wonderful Majorelle Garden that he restored in Marrakech. It's easy to see what he found so inspirational about the place: the soft pink light at sunset, the scent of roses, the wonderful aroma of spices as you wander through the souk and the loudspeakers blaring out the call to prayers.
The garden is a riot of colour and even the thousands of tourists who plod through daily photographing everything can't detract from its delights. The bright "majorelle" blue purse on a silken cord that I bought in the gift shop is my own affordable bit of YSL magic. Back in England, our gardens seem so tasteful and restrained in comparison.
Mixed up over mammals
I'm sure dolphins are intelligent, but the fuss over the death of some of these mammals shows how keen we are to endow them with human characteristics. One theory is that the deaths were caused by some kind of suicide pact, another that the Navy's sonar devices were to blame.
I've helped to rear two calves that will be slaughtered next week. This has brought hate mail from animal lovers – the same emotional response engendered by the dead dolphins. If you drink milk, then calves are the by-product of cows that need to breed to lactate. If we don't eat free-range British veal, then male calves will be slaughtered or sent to the continent to be raised in far less amenable surroundings. We need to unpick our emotional baggage about mammals, whether they swim or moo.
Miliband has adopted two boys – and a new master plan
Why has David Miliband reversed his rule of not talking about his private life, telling an interviewer why he and his wife adopted two boys from America? Mr Miliband and his wife, who has American citizenship, said they wanted to adopt children from birth, whereas in this country prospective parents have to go through a long process, meaning most children are at least a year old before they are adopted.
Surely, as a politician, Mr Miliband is in a strong position to push through changes to the rigid – and, some would say, inflexible – British system, if he cares so much about giving children a good start. Or did he prefer to cough up a big cheque – which many adopters here couldn't afford – and buy his babies in the US, where less questions are asked?
Miliband has been accused of acting like "a pillock on a gap year" by a fellow Labour MP, and he's got all the gravitas of a talking Ken doll when mouthing platitudes about violence in Zimbabwe. The adoption revelations are clearly part of a master plan to rebrand himself as an all-round family man and mount a challenge to Gordon Brown.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
30 Comments
petitions.pm.gov.uk/DavisByelection/
I'm sick of the spin campaign being waged* without the Govt having the guts to risk a decent debate on their civil rights record by opposing him in an open forum. Too much has gone through due to lack of Parlimentary time to scrutinise.
* except in JSP's article
Posted by Nigel Annand | 17.06.08, 02:15 GMT
There are many, many frustrations in"Broken England" which
cannot be, because of political correctness, articulated. In order to
do so a stealth political party needs to be launced. Let us fervently
hope this is what Davis, and his sponsors have in mind. Keep a
low profile until real potential has been achieved, then pounce
with you`re real agenda. Let us hope that is their plan.
Posted by D. Edmund Brady | 16.06.08, 19:05 GMT
A cynical ploy or not, David Davis has made a stand on an issue that needs to be talked about properly. Many powerful papers slated him and political allies attempted to isolate him in fear of opinion polls. But this erosion of civil liberties has to be combatted without delay. The over-arching state is a constant threat in a culture dictated by fear of attack, and we must defend our freedoms from terrorism, not surrender them.
I very much doubt this will get through the Lords, but it is this kind of issue that the government is wasting too much political capital on when it has to turn its attention to fundamental issues such as the economy. Politcally, civil liberties are an extremely heavy argument to push through, and I fail to see the logic behind pushing through this erosion of rights when political capital is so short and their are already laws permitting extension.
Posted by Charlie Peters | 16.06.08, 17:25 GMT
The government pushes the so called increased terror threat to get these draconian laws, but eventually they will be used on all of us. Neither the government nor the police are to be trusted with this sort of power. I find it suspicious that so many in the media immediately attacked Davis's stand. Whose side are the media on these days?
Posted by Shaun | 16.06.08, 16:53 GMT
As an ex-Labour supporter (since the Iraq war) I want to lend my support for David Davis and his stand for civil liberties - particularly in relation to ID cards, DNA databases, number plate recognition schemes, phone record collection etc. I am sick to death of this surveillance and private data collection society we are creating. Only last week there was a draft Communications Bill proposal to record every email and phone call made by UK citizens - Labour are pushing for more and more state spying in to our PRIVATE lives.
Citizens have a fundamental right to privacy. It's about time that this very important issue was brought in to the public spotlight.
Posted by Kevin | 15.06.08, 23:38 GMT
HawardenDavid has upset two groups - the political commentators who didn't get a sniff that it was about to happen, and the politicians who fear the talk of 'principle'. The man in the street has a different perspective, and Davis has struck a chord. Why is terrorist legislation being used by local authorities to combat petty crime? How long before they are using the current 42-day legislation as an enforcement measure. George Orwell only got the date wrong. Let Gordon Brown put up a candidate if he is so confident of winning the argument and the support of the voters of
Hawarden. Or afraid of loss of deposit?
Posted by Ian Coates | 15.06.08, 20:24 GMT
Thank you for writing about David Davis. I am absolutely sick of the government trying to make me live in fear and I am thrilled that someone has the bravery to say that enough is enough. I am an old lady, living in Devon, but I am not stupid and will not be bullied. Thanks again, Val
Posted by Val Stanley | 15.06.08, 20:21 GMT
It's a sad sign of these (still) Blairite times that it takes a Tory to stand up for civil liberties.
Posted by Stef | 15.06.08, 19:36 GMT
Well done to David Davis. He is willing to raise voice, at substantial risk to his political career and should be applauded for it.
Never supported a Tory, but if I was in his constituency, I would vote for him.
The current supine Labour lot are making us sleep walk into a police state. These civil liberties distinguish Britain from tin pot dictatorship, we will be foolish to let these slip by. Someone must stand up and say enough is enough.
Posted by r matif | 15.06.08, 19:11 GMT
Unfortunately, the closest thing we could have had to a constitution is The Lisbon Treaty - Rubbished, closeted and now dead. I'm not sure that people want civil liberties any more. I take my hat off to David Davies for standing up for what he and I vociferously believe in - But in a country that, by the back door, is ranked alongside China & Russia for state intrusion into people's lives - I have the feeling that his gesture will not only go unnoticed, but ridiculed by the public.
Posted by Roman | 15.06.08, 15:57 GMT
30 Comments