Janet Street-Porter: Don't blame Kate. It's the fashionistas who love skinny models
Despite all the hand-wringing, nothing has been done to stop women starving themselves for the catwalk. It's all about money
Sunday, 31 August 2008
You can't blame Kate Moss for the fashion industry's love affair with skin and bone. But when she told an interviewer how she ended up thin because "you'd go on shoots with bad food or get on a plane and the food would be disgusting ... or go to a show and there's no food", you do want to scream: "Kate, love, you could have stopped for a sandwich! You know, that thing with two slices of bread and something in between."
But, there again, Kate, and I've met her many times, doesn't really inhabit the same world as you or me. How could she, having being spotted at 14, the same age I was trading in my milk bottle-bottom glasses? As a teenager, I was queuing to get into clubs each night and swotting for exams during the day – while Kate was flying round the world being photographed in her knickers. Her appeal has always been androgynous, fun, hard to pin down.
I know – because she told me – she doesn't eat a proper meal in the evenings. That's how she's kept her figure. Frankly, there's not a lot wrong with that; in a society where far too many people stuff themselves I've seen Kate eat a full breakfast, but never dinner – she cleverly just pushes a bit of food around her plate and sips a drink.
Kate wisely does few interviews, but lets slip enough to reveal that she never wanted to be too thin – implying that it was what her paymasters preferred. Now she's in a position to dictate her terms, but plenty of younger girls aren't so lucky. So who's helping them? Next month, London Fashion Week kicks off, and in spite of endless hand-wringing about size-zero models, with the Government and the British Fashion Council setting up a much-publicised Model Health Inquiry, what progress has been made to ensure that models don't starve? Bugger all.
The situation is the same as when Kate started out 20 years ago: an unspoken code among the designers and photographers which decides that size 6 to 8 is best. Plans to make all catwalk models pay £250 for a medical check and a doctor's certificate to show they're "fit to work" have come to nothing because, as a spokeswoman said, "Milan, Rome and Paris wouldn't agree."
The fashion world is a business, and the Government should never have got involved. Nothing must deter buyers, fashion writers and models visiting London and oiling the wheels of a multimillion-pound business that needs all the help it can get in the face of tough competition from abroad. The laughable Model Health Inquiry has achieved nothing, because there was no will for it to do so.
None of this is Kate Moss's business – she makes her living by continually travelling and working hard. One nasty female columnist – who makes sure the photo on top of her column always features her in a tiny petticoat – carped last week because a solid gold statue of Kate, valued at £1.5m, is to go on display at the British Museum. This columnist claimed "our vacuous-faced, bow-legged Mona Lisa has about as much mystery as a jellyfish".
Wow! That'll be a jellyfish worth around £40m, then. A jellyfish who's never told young girls not to eat, ordered them to smoke, or encouraged them to take drugs. Frankly, Kate Moss is who she is. A hard-working millionairess. And the British Fashion Council is spineless and pathetic.
Is Jacko modelling himself on Keira Knightley
A landmark birthday for Peter Pan, Michael Jackson, who turned 50 on Friday. He decided not to celebrate, but to spend the day quietly with his family – the family of kids who have no contact with their mother and spend their days following Dad around the shops in Las Vegas, where he generally wears pyjama bottoms for public appearances. (We get worked up about Gary Glitter having access to children, while Michael, who paid off the families of two boys he formed "close" friendships with, is still allowed unsupervised control of his own youngsters.)
Much has been written about Michael's addiction to plastic surgery. Judging by recent photos, he seems to have abandoned his previous role model – Liz Taylor in her prime – and opted for a more contemporary female: our very own Keira Knightley. The lank black hair, the hesitant smile, and boyish torso, and he's got that Knightley simper perfectly.
Meanwhile, our talented thespian has been doing interviews to promote her latest film, 'The Duchess', which opens next month, moaning about the agony of wearing 27 different costumes for her portrayal of the 18th-century Duchess of Devonshire. Powdered wigs next for Wacko?
Strictly same old faces
I wonder what boxes casting directors ticked when selecting amiable John Sergeant, former chief political correspondent for the BBC and one time political editor for ITN, for the new series of Strictly Come Dancing?
The one old hand the whole country wants to see on the show, and who says he'd love to do it, is the doyen of the Lib Dems, Vince Cable. I'm sure he's been asked, but mindful of Nick Clegg's plummeting popularity ratings, he has clearly decided to focus on his political career rather than a popular TV shows.
Sergeant is roughly the same age, and a jolly enough chap on Have I Got News for You. But with his appearances on The One Show, he has become just another BBC face, the kind they like to pack out these extravaganzas with. Of the 16 contestants, about half appear on the BBC already.
What women want: a decent loo
In spite of a directive in 2007 requiring local authorities to ensure that town planning recognises the requirements of both men and women, it hasn't happened, according to a report published by Cambridge University.
Men and women really do spend their days differently. Women have complex journeys dropping kids off at school, going to work and getting the shopping before returning home. Many want crèches and schools near their place of work.
We're big public transport users – only 30 per cent of us can use a car during the day – and women make up 75 per cent of bus passengers. Pavements aren't designed for buggies, and most women prefer parks with plants and ponds, rather than vast green spaces for kicking a ball about.
We need public toilets and we need better lit streets. But don't hold your breath.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
12 Comments
Anne O'Recksick - presumably you're happy for the girls to keep "Chewin' the pies" so long as you can keep munchin' the minge. It's precisely this sort of selfish ........... (rants irrationally for ..........hours ....... and....... hours.... )
Posted by Rupert Fotherington-Smythe | 01.09.08, 11:50 GMT
Congratulations to the columnist whoever she is, yep Moss is an over rated female, with dodgy teeth and bandy legs. Oh forgot to mention junkie. Now Giselle Bundchen pure class!!
Posted by Irene Rybinska | 31.08.08, 23:50 GMT
What I find most odd about ' catwalk models' is their 'knock knees' and 'weird' way of walking. I'm told they are selected to please women, most men prefer something more akin to the Playboy type, even if they daren't say so!
Posted by David Vinter, | 31.08.08, 22:05 GMT
well i love the orca fat blubbery women of britain - keep chewin the pies girls!
Posted by Anne O'Recksick | 31.08.08, 20:43 GMT
I'm a heterosexual man who is not remotely a "fashionista" but I think most people have an utterly bizarre idea of what constitutes "skinny". There seems to be idea that anyone who is not carrying excess body fat is anorexic - no, some people may be, but others may simply be in superb physical condition. I have the uncomfortable feeling that this subject is completely distorted by jealousy. As a skinny, athletic man I have no problem at all saying that I find skinny, athletic women extremely attractive.
Posted by Rob Morgan | 31.08.08, 19:15 GMT
Katie - I know that catwalk models aren't chosen for sexual attractiveness: what I'm saying is that I wish women wouldn't try and emulate their unhealthy and strange skinniness. "Curves" is "just code for low standards". Where did you get that one from?!
One is "bitter" at the bombardment by the fashion industry of women in general, and girls in particular, of images that not only will they find difficult/impossible to emulate but are downright unhealthy, oftentimes. "Bitter"? I wouldn't go that far. Annoyed by the general stupidity of it all. I've got a horrible feeling you're connected with the industry in some way. Your postng bears the hallmarks of vested interests/myopia owing to "not being able to see the wood for the trees".
Posted by Rupert Fotherington-Smythe | 31.08.08, 16:24 GMT
Many models are not chosen for how attractive or desirable they are to the average guy, they're chosen because they look striking more than pretty. Shocking, sometimes. You see a lot of catwalk models who have very unusual, bordering on plain odd facial features, and the stick figure ones are just like that to show off clothes, not for people to ogle.
This article and the people who usually get upset at thin people look bitter and like they're lashing out sometimes, its a cliche just like all the people who come out of the woodwork defending 'curves' which is just code for 'low standards'.
Posted by Katie | 31.08.08, 15:55 GMT
Well it's funny that we can't do something because "Milan, Rome and Paris wouldn't agree." How is it that Madrid (where I live) has managed it. Frankly as an excuse that is spineless. I agree entirely with the comments above about curvaceous women. Frankly the anorexic looking fashion models are about as attractive as a dead dog.
Posted by Charles | 31.08.08, 13:05 GMT
Men love curvaceous women, not skinny ones! The fashion industry promotes a female body image that heterosexual men do not find particularly sexy. Women: wake up. Ditch the obsession with being skinny! It's drivel that makes so many of you neurotic and anorexic. Don't buy the idiot rags that peddle this nonsense. Don't buy into the fashion industry idiocy.
Posted by Rupert Fotherington-Smythe | 31.08.08, 12:17 GMT
It is WOMEN who keep the fashion industry thriving - so do not blame men, coz most of us couldn't give a monkeys about fashion models etc. It is women's fault, not men;s, that women are pressured via the media. It would perhaos help of Janet were not seuch a sexist inane nonsense merchant wuth stoopid red hair - all fat guts mutton and no lamb... The fashion industry is not responsible for evolutionat feminine urges to llook fertile.
Posted by floober | 31.08.08, 11:57 GMT
12 Comments