Janet Street-Porter: We've lost sight of what bravery really means
Is "brave" the most over-used word in the English language? Jade Goody receives the same kind of gushing tributes that surrounded the death of Princess Diana. Then, psychologist Oliver James was roundly condemned for daring to voice the opinion that the nation was succumbing to a kind of collective hysteria (and not true mourning) about a woman people felt they knew, even though they'd never met or spoken to her.
Writing in this paper at the time he said: "Feelings of shock and regret that she should no longer be with us and sympathy for her relatives would be appropriate. But (for people) to become convinced that they have lost a friend or relative seems out of place ... unlike in a real relationship, this person was never there in the flesh and she had no opportunity to communicate with them personally ... the boundaries between reality and fantasy are becoming seriously blurred."
Earlier this week in The Independent Johann Hari implied that to find Jade an unacceptable role model betrayed snobbery and a lack of humanity. Well, I disagree. Eleven years after Diana's death, will the funeral of Jade Goody turn into the same outpouring of grief that Oliver James found so worrying?
The ubiquitous Max Clifford has already promised us large television screens outside the church in Essex where the ceremony takes place on 4 April, and who knows what celebrity guests he will conjure up to participate? He's divulged that the coffin will be made of oak from the Royal Windsor forest and that there will be a 21-car cortège. It's all beginning to sound like a state funeral.
Jade was partly responsible for her condition – failing to respond to hospital letters telling her that her smear tests were abnormal and she should urgently seek medical help. She should have been on her guard after pre-cancerous cells were removed when she was just 16. Yes, there has been a huge increase in the number of young girls going for check-ups since her condition was made public, with the Government reviewing the age at which the NHS starts screening in England, which is currently 25, as opposed to 20 in the rest of the UK.
Yes, Jade had every right to exploit the media interest in her progress to raise as much money as possible for the upkeep of her young sons. But can we move on and consider other, equally distressing deaths – people born with challenges in life which certainly matched those of Jade.
I cried when I read that Martin Ryan had died in Kingston Hospital at the age of just 43, after a breakdown in communication with staff led to a failure to feed him not for a week, but 26 days. Martin was born with Down's syndrome and epilepsy. He died because he couldn't tell anyone what was happening to him. I hope the staff who were working on that ward never forget the image of Martin dying. Martin was brave. The cause of death was listed as pneumonia, but many would disagree. His parents have been offered just £40,000 compensation – a pittance compared to the deals Max Clifford secured for Jade.
Mark Cannon, an epileptic with learning difficulties, died at the age of 30, in Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS hospital. He was admitted in agony with a broken leg, and it took three days for a pain team to attend to him. He died eight and a half weeks later, having lost 40 per cent of his blood. Mark was brave. A report has said his death was unnecessary but I'm sure that's not a lot of help to his grieving parents.
The Health and Local government Ombudsman has compiled a damning report on the levels of care given to six adults with learning difficulties who died at the hands of the NHS. It finds "distressing failures", and serious deficits in the way complaints were dealt with.
Can we please adjust our values? The avoidable death of just one person is appalling. But when that person has learning difficulties, it's criminal. Needless to say, no one has lost their jobs as a result of the deaths of Mark, and Martin.
Me, Spandau Ballet and an outbreak of flowing scarves
*They're back together, and going on tour – the Eighties band that fell out spectacularly but have finally buried their differences. It seems only yesterday that I made a film with Spandau Ballet, then an unsigned group from Islington, north London.
Back in June 1980 I was producing my first television series, Twentieth-Century Box, and I'd heard about the Spands through a chap called Ollie who worked at my hairdresser's. The boys took themselves very seriously and were deeply pretentious. They must have changed their clothes dozens of times during the day we filmed them, finally opting for kilts, feathered berets and flowing scarves for the secret gig at the Scala cinema in London's Fitzrovia, attended by Steve Strange and all the leading lights of London's New Romantic movement. The band were introduced by a poem from their mate, the writer and DJ Robert Elms, and the crowd included Sara Dallin from Bananarama. She's still a friend, and has worn rather better than the Spands. Sadly, I don't think Tony Hadley, and Martin and Gary Kemp have got enough hair to recreate the quiffs of yesteryear – but that won't stop their loyal fans turning up in droves for their gigs.
Berkoff shows how to do it
*The new trend in theatre is to turn a cult movie into a stage play. In recent years both The 39 Steps and Brief Encounter have been reinvented, with a considerable degree of critical and box-office success.
I've just seen Steven Berkoff's stage version of On The Waterfront, in which he uses a dozen actors as a chorus, playing everything from longshoremen to pigeons. There are moments in the evening when the pace sags, but there is no denying that it's a worthwhile experiment, with brilliant choreography and lighting. Berkoff, as usual, steals the show as the evil gangster boss.
Priscilla, Queen Of The Desert, on the other hand, seems to have fallen flat on its feathers. One critic described the musical, which opened this week, left, as "more costume than content". We'll have to wait and see if it becomes the show of choice for discerning hen parties – in which case, count me out.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
> difficulties, it's criminal.
Quite right, Janet.
Deliberately depriving a person of pain medication is tantamount to torture.
Deliberately depriving a person of food is tantamount to murder.
Why has there been no police action to prosecute those responsible??
And all this at a time when horrendous tales and reports are coming out about NHS patient neglect right across Britain according to C4 Confessions of Nurses documentary.
Bravery is hardly apt for the sick.Stoic yes.But then when sick one has no option but to be stoic.Nothing to do with bravery at all and I ought to know after 14 operations.
Racist: The main part of the definition of this word is the aspect of 'superiority' of one race over another. The accusation of Racism is rarely correct. Xenophobia would be far more accurate, or just a personnel preference not to mix.
Bully: Mostly accused as being done by children, but again most of the time they are taunting. Bullying has a more physical aspect too it.
Gay: This is being happy, not a Homosexual.
"Gay" is past praying for, I'm afraid: its original meaning so perverted that it's difficult to use it nowadays even in historical novels. As for "racist", I agree that it's often used to describe mere dislike of foreigners rather than any belief that a particular skin pigmentation is superior or inferior to another. You do meet with it occasionally: cf. David Irving's memorable 2000 radio interview with Dr. Oliver James from which it emerged that for Irving the most important thing about any human being is which "race" he chooses to assign them to: also a rooted belief that all members of all "races" other than his own - particularly the Jewish one - will act and think the same way and automatically support one another's interests like a colony of ants. But apart from a few such antediluvians you don't meet with it much these days, so constant use of the word "racism" does rather obscure the issues.
Ironically of course, we are now living in a soiety more obsessed with race than any since nazi germany. All those boxes to tick on those silly forms, and the positive action and discrimination 'justified' by beancounters and the diversity industry.
Other words that have lost their traditional meanings: 'respect' which is no longer earned (the old British meaning) but must be given to anyone demandingh it with menaces (African american origin I believe); middle class: no longer a social class based on attitudes, lifestyles, decency, culture and education perhaps, as was the British meaning, but now anyone who has a mortgage like the Simpsons (again and American meaning). And so many more: appropriate, community, multi-faith, diversity, equality, fairness, change, manager... etc etc etc blah blah blah.
And why the worry about not using it to mean happy anyway? There are plenty of other synonyms for happy, and it hurt no-one that gay became used as a positive term for a persecuted section of society. This is in marked contrast to a more recent meaning of the term to mean 'rubbish', which, while unfortunately legitimate if it does enter common usage, was derived precisely because it already meant homosexual; its prejudice is inherent in its existence.
I think you're being over-sensitive here, as many women find the use of girl OK, so why should you assume your view represents all women? Not the same then with the use of gay to mean rubbish. And girl is not used to mean rubbish either.
I don't assume that my view represents all women. And I know what you mean when you say that some women like to be called a 'girl'. That isn't what I meant.
On several occassions I have heard the phrase: 'Don't be such a girl' said to both men and women when they have been perceived to be doing something badly. The first time I heard it was when my son was very small on his first visit to the barber. He was quite nervous (always more nervous of the barber than the dentist for some reason) Because my son kept flinching when the barber went near to his ears with the scissors the barber said to him: 'Don't be such a girl.' It was meant as put down to my son. And I have heard the same put down used quite a lot since then.
That is the context I meant.
You're right - this is something all boys and men learn: that is they complain or express weakness in any way, then people - especially women, but some men too - will insult, demean and belittle them. 'Don't be such a girl' as 'don;t be such a wimp' is said, but just accusations of being weak, wet, or just sneered at and disrespected by men and particularly women is somthing all men have to put up with. Listen to feminists sneering at men, calling them wimps and useless. Insecurity cause that true, but men always have to show they are not weak and wimps, so are under constant stress that women know ntohing about really. Why men die younger perhaps.
I remember when I was 8 this horrid girl in class wenet round pinching the boys - hard - and it hurt. So our mums complained and the male head came to our class. When we said who we were compaining about he just said 'A GIRL!' because he thought we were complaining about a boy and compaining about a girl made us wimps. Humiliation for all us boys of course - but at least the psycho-girl stopped her pinching. I also remember a truly horrible female teacher who used to call any boy who ever got upset at anything 'wet' - so if their father had just disappeared due to divorce or died and were sad and upset, then she just spat the word 'wet' at them. Hope she's dead really. Preferably by drowning...
This is all natural perhaps, evolutionary even, and prepares boys for the life of a man. Men do soldier on - no bad thing - and that pressure is one reason why. But in some ways it's not good - and particluarly when we have a healthcare system that expects patients to visit a clinic and does not cater to men's natural reluctance.
But I have known others frown on our treatment of our son, saying that we are going to make him: 'soft'. We haven't. He has all his father physical courage but is also very caring and open with his feelings.
I do feel sorry for men that they are expected not to cry or show emotion.
I do not think modern touchy-feeling parenting and father-ing is necessarily better than having a father who does not do that at all either. Just having a father there and doping stuff together is enough. In fact I hate the emotionalism of the modern age. How do you know it was beneficial to your kids for their father to be so open with emotions? You cannot compare the alternative.
The real problem is that there is so much divorce and so many single mum families where boys have no father at all. Not PC to say so, but all statistics show this is very bad for boys' wellbeing and health.
I do find it a shame that men who are not violent and rough get seen as weak, and women who are rude arrogent pigs get seen as 'strong' or 'feisty' like La Janet herself. No - bullying others and being an arrogant selfish prat is weak for men and women.
Your examples of NHS failings are continuing and regular examples of how the 'conventional' medial industry continues to use reductionist and mechanistic theories for treatment. Where patients are seen merely as diseased objects there to be cured. If doctors were taught to take a more holistic approach, even if they do not approve of natural medicine theories, I'm sure there would be less deaths due to neglect, mistakes or down right stupidity.
I wonder how you can call the deat hs of Marks and Martin brave and yet not allow this statement to apply to Jade ? They all died through medical conditions and most probably in extreme pain.
You are guilty of snobbery because of the snide comments in your article implying that Jade almost deserved her fate.
I did not have much time for Jade when she was alive but I felt sad when she died. You may ask why ? Well it was because of another young life lost and for her 2 children now without their mother. I also feel sad for the parents of Mark & Martin and should you be basing this article on questioning why on earth they were left to die and why no one has been sacked or even dragged up in front of a judge to explain the facts ?
You are right to question the hysteria but to say Jade was not brave is a sad reflection of what you have become a reactionary person trying to grab the headlines.
So shame on you
But I think I''m very brave to put up with a dumbed down media that celebrates the ignorance of bimbos like Jade whose illness was cause by promiscuous sex at a young age, and with sanctimonious twerps like you of course.
I agree whole heartedly about the misuse of words. 'Brave' for footballers and don't even get me started on the word 'Respect'. Respect and courtesy are confused by so many. Whilst I treat everyone with common courtesy I reserve my right to respect those whom I feel have earned it. And we don't all respect the same qualities in others so it is purely subjective. But I know that I don't respect those who are aggressive, intimidating, loud, rude and ignorant.
One favour the education system could do the country at the moment is to teach teenagers the difference between the word respect and the word courtesy.
Which I very much aree with!
I'm not saying that I don't agree with your comments about female promiscuity, however, HPV is transmitted through sex. i.e. a woman (or a man) who catches it must have caught it from someone.
Additionally, it is not necessary for a woman to have contracted HPV to develop cervical cancer, it is one of the many factors (including smoking, multiple pregnancies, and so on) and it is not an STI, but can result from STIs.
And with respect to the lone teenage mums, they're alone because someone's walked out on them, it takes two adults to raise a child, not one person who's a child themselves!
To summarise - it takes two to have sex, so lets *all* take responsibilty for our own protection.
My sentiments for Jade and her faily are the same as yours: quiet pity for the children and I do agree with Janet when she says it has all gone a bit OTT (courtesy of a certain Mr. Clifford, no doubt), but after reading Jahann Hari's article yesterday there was many truths in that too. I think the media have made her a parody of herself and she's not as bad or good as they make out, she's just one of the normal folk out there who didn't have the best start and used what she had to make the best out of her situation.
But for her death to be marked as more important than, in particular, the 5 avoidable deaths (including Mark Cannon and Martin Ryan or, for that matter, anyone else who has dies of cervical cancer) is absurd.
This is sad, but it's all part of life's rich tapestry.
Generally Hari's articles are so absurd and contrived they are not worth comment, but in this case I am pleased you did. We have all seen Jade as a nasty gobby bully, something Hari's sugar coated one sided nonsense failed to address, and frankly she epitomised what is wrong in this country.
The death of one of these poor guys is worth a hundred Jade Goodys, whilst her death, like Diana's, is a great tragedy for her kids, I have to say good riddance to old rubbish.
There should be prosecuted in all these heartbreaking cases. Sad thing is these cases are probably only the tip of the iceberg. What a state as a nation we have come to.
Jade buried her head in the sand regarding the letters which came to warn her that she needed to seek urgent treatment. Again, we all do it. How many of us try and hide and don't confront the truth about health issues? Hoping that they will go away or that the worse won't happen to us?
Sleeping around only 'increases' the chance of developing cervical cancer. You can in fact get it from sleeping with just one person if that one person happens to carry the virus.
I didn't take much notice of Jade when she was alive and I don't particularly want to take much notice of her now she is dead, though my sympathies are with her family, as they would be with anyone's family in these circumstances. But I think it unfair that she is seen as culpable in her own death. She is no more culpable than any of us, except that one perfect human being who doesn't really exist.
The case for Princess Dianna is interesting. At first she seemed like a pleasant but somewhat naive young woman, who was chosen by others, and who did not understand the ramifications of the, for lack of a better word, 'job' that she for which she was chosen. Then due to the exuberance of the media, she learned to enjoy her celebrity status. However in the end she proved to be a victim of the same media, and its insatiable appetite for sensation. I am sure that there were moments in her life when she was brave, but all in all she should be pitied just like those mentioned above, although, to a large extent, she lacked their innocence. She did however do her job by helping provide the heir and the spare.
Jade Goody on the other hand was doomed from the start. There are many people, the talented and the ingenious, who accomplish great things in life in spite of tremendous odds. Believing in their gift, they overcame great odds in order to fulfill their destiny. This is a form of bravery but it does not mean that they necessarily were good or even balanced individuals. Jane Goody was not one such individual. Her talents remained unobserved till the end. Yet she had the courage and determination, to live her life to the fullest, to acknowledge her obvious flaws and faults, and to see things through to the end. Unlike the case of Dianna, hers was a conscious decision that required guts and true grit. She may not have been wise, neither cultured, nor good most of the times, but if one were attribute to her one positive quality, it would have to be bravery or courage. There may be several reasons not to like her but cowardice is not one of them. Please tell me if I am wrong.
Who was Jade Goody? I'm not wishing to seem heartless here, but seriously, who was she? I attended my grandmother's funeral recently and it upset me to realise I will never enjoy her company again, but Jade? Who was she? I do not possess a TV, but every time I walked into a shop, there on the newspaper stand was this face constantly gawping out of the front pages under headlines such as "Jade Goes to Tesco", "Jade wears a green dress", "Jade is ill", then "Jade is dead", but does it stop there? No, it just gets sicker.
I ask again, WHO WAS JADE GOODY?
Perhaps more importantly, why is she important to anyone outside her family / immediate friends? To my mind, a person is important / significant to me if they have some direct influence over my life. Does this apply to Jade? Is she some roll model for modern Britain? I'm with Oliver James all the way on this matter, the Jade culture is just sick, puerile, train crash voyeurism, I know 12 year olds who can see this.
And Janet is right, the word "brave" does not apply here: bravery implies choice and, in the face of a terminal illness, choice is removed. Almost everyone who dies publicly these days is deemed "brave", the word seems to have lost its original meaning and become a synonym for anyone who suffers. Can someone tell me the difference between a "brave cancer sufferer" and a "cowardly cancer sufferer"? I guess if Myra Hindley got cancer she would be the latter, right? "HURRAH JADE!", "BOO MYRA"
"Yet she had the courage and determination, to live her life to the fullest, to acknowledge her obvious flaws and faults, and to see things through to the end."
Really? And what choice was she given? Also, can you separate her own words from those of Max Clifford, etc?
No, lefalcon, you are not misjudging from afar, modern Britain is fast becoming a disgusting place to live, a place where millions of people are so utterly devoid of any real sense of self-worth and responsibility that they look to media morons / celebrities for inspiration and guidance, anyone will do. This place is becoming so crap that people try to find someone worse off than themselves in order that they might compare their positions and feel better about themselves, Britain is becoming a cynical, nasty place to live: I have even stopped listening to national radio because listening to it makes my feel like I am being programmed more than informed.
I'm ashamed of my nation, I truly am.
Can someone please pass a law making it not merely legal, but compulsory to shoot that scummy, gossiping little slimeball Max Clifford and anyone else like him? That would be a step in the right direction. People like him just perpetuate the moron mentality that modern Britain seems to aspire to.
I am always sad to hear of someone dying, especially a young person with children, but this happens daily perhaps thousands of times - what makes Jade more special than some 16 year old mother with her dead infant baby beside her, sat begging at the roadside, desperately trying to raise enough money to bury her child? If British people need appalling real life stories to make them feel better about their own position, then I know plenty of charity workers who will satiate that appetite with far more heart rending tales than they could imagine.
Nah, Celeb Big Brother is where it's at. Then if you fancy feeling angry you can switch over to Eastenders. But we're all nice people really, see how much we care for Jade?
Did you read Johann Hari's article on Jade? He discusses how she has reflected society.
Jade, as far as I can see it, achieved nothing- here's my take from the outside. Jade was TV gold: in a society in which the most popular TV program is "The Apprentice", she was exactly what BB needed, some controversy, someone for people to laugh at and feel superior to. In many important ways, she is more of a statistic than the rest of us.I don't think this woman had much choice in what happened to her, I reckon she wanted to be a star, but those behind BB saw something better for their ratings - a disaster just waiting to happen and when it did happen, the tabloids would have some great sounding splashes about a total non entity. No-news become news.They created Jade as a little filler for their own agendas.
If Jade had lived a longer life, she would have become an object of tabloid readers' hate making regular headlines whenever The Scum, etc was short of a story (which probably means daily). The media machine changed from vilifying her to glorifying her in a heartbeat when it became apparent she was terminally ill because it was realised that this is the best way to sell more papers.
So what next? Shall we get someone with learning difficulties on BB so that we can laugh at them too? A Downs sufferer? Perhaps someone with Parkinson's would make good TV too.
Nothing good will come of this. Now she will probably become a pin-up for cervical cancer which might draw more money into that charity ("industry"?) at the detriment of other charities. The illusion will be that this is good.
Unfortuanately, I can't ascribe that word to Jade for fairly obvious reasons. You can't be brave, if there is no choice (and hence risk) in the outcome. Jade was terminally ill, and nature took it's course. Hence, no bravery, no dignity (the media circus that it was) and some sadness for her family, friends, and some commentators, myself not included.
Jane Goody took the tremendous risk of not being liked...I don't think that she took pleasure in being cast as a villain...and who among us does not in the end want to be loved. The fact that many people would not be positively disposed towards her did not prevent her from being herself. This for me is courage...this is being brave.
Probably something in there for everyone of us. Looking at BRAVE as a verb, then Jade did suffer, so in verb form she was brave.
Janet who do you think you are?!! The cause of cervical cancer is not entirely known. 8/10 people are said to carry to HPV virus and in fact most women with abnormal cells do not get cervical cancer. Jade had smears, maybe the authorities should have been educating women more about this. But to blame Jade is absurd!!
And to say that a woman who has faced the certian death under the public spotlight is not Brave? Then who is brave Janet? She smiled at death's door, made sure her kids were all right and accepted she was going to die rather than hiding away and feeling sorry for herself.
Janet - I love the decription of your memoirs "Baggage, My childhood"
It's descibed by your publishers as "Brilliant, brave, controversial, combative, intellectual - just how do you become Janet Street-Porter?". Maybe you should get that changed