Call Me Dave: Four extraordinary and utterly unverified claims from the David Cameron book

Many of the claims to have emerged are not firmly backed up by documentary evidence or on-the-record sources

Click to follow
The Independent Online

Lord Ashcroft’s biography of David Cameron, being serialised this week by the Daily Mail, has fired up Westminster and the Twittersphere. It turns out there are a remarkable number of jolly pictures of the Prime Minister bopping at posh parties in the 1980s; there are also now more pig jokes in circulation than anyone thought possible.

Cameron has made clear he doesn’t intend to ‘dignify’ the allegations in the book by responding to them. And No 10 clearly wants us to infer that Lord Ashcroft is motivated by a desire to settle a “personal beef” (not pork) with his former ally. Ashcroft denies the suggestion and his co-author, Isabel Oakeshott, has argued that the book would have been published before the election had revenge been its purpose.

 

david-cameron-6.jpg
What do we know now about the Prime Minister that we didn’t before? (PA)

Either way, it is notable that many of the more colourful claims to have emerged thus far are not firmly backed up by documentary evidence or on-the-record sources. That doesn’t mean they can simply be discounted – but it’s hard to imagine some of the assertions appearing in the mainstream media were it not for the book’s publication.

So what do we know now about the Prime Minister that we didn’t before?

1. He (sort of) did it with a dead pig, allegedly.

For from having his snout in the trough, Cameron is said to have put his trough in the snout of a dead pig during a bizarre initiation ceremony. The claim comes from an unnamed MP who appears not have seen the act himself, but says he has seen a photo of the dirty deed. But the person who is said to have the photograph did not respond to approaches from Ashcroft and Oakeshott.

2. He smoked weed, allegedly.

James Delingpole is quoted as saying that he and his pal Dave smoked joints while listening to Supertramp in his room at Christchurch College. Then again, he tweeted over the weekend: “I deny everything. We didn’t inhale. Or something.” Cameron has previously responded to questions about drug use in his student days by saying simply: “I had a normal university experience”. That might explain the weed and the ‘70s prog rock, but still leaves questions about that pig.

3. Cocaine “circulated” at a dinner party at his home, allegedly

As for harder drugs, the book refers to a dinner guest who claims to have seen cocaine being “in open circulation” at the Camerons’ home, though the guest did not see either the Prime Minister or his wife taking it. A big party of Chipping Norton set types is described by Ashcroft and Oakeshott as “loud, boozy and perhaps not entirely free of class-A drugs”. In short: caveats rule OK.  

4. He was once willing to giving George Osborne the sack, allegedly

The PM and his Chancellor are the closest of political allies and are said to have a genuine friendship. But according to the new biography, after Osborne became involved in a row over a private meeting with a Russian tycoon, Cameron – then leader of the Opposition – “hinted” in “private” conversations with “close confidents” that he was willing to give his right hand man the boot, “if absolutely necessary”. No named sources here, though the story hardly tells us much of note: at the time of the row the Tories poll-lead over Labour was cut from 20-points to eight, with the general election just 18 months away. Surely no party leader in history would stand by even their most trusted lieutenant if doing so put an election in jeopardy.

…And he one claim we don’t need to quality

His foreign policy has been inept, allegedly

Actually, there are plenty of on the record sources for this one, not to mention mounting evidence on the ground that the UK’s intervention in Libya – and its policy towards the Syrian civil war – haven’t exactly worked.

There is no doubt that Ashcroft’s biography has caused something of a sensation; and it will presumably shift a fair few copies. But it is hard to shift the feeling that some of the allegations may never be proved. And others raise questions about whether there is a degree of intrusion that can really be justified by the public interest. In any event, by maintaining a ‘dignified’ silence, Cameron will believe that in the long-run he will not be overly damaged.

Sure enough, if the primary impression created by the book is that the Prime Minister is a big posho who hangs around with other poshos and did some daft things at Oxford with his elite pals, one might reasonably wonder whether it will make a single jot of difference to the way he’s perceived.

 

 

 

Comments