Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Assemble wins Turner Prize 2015: Room to improve... but this is a radical statement

It makes a sociological point – that distinctive community streets were erased in thoughtless regeneration programmes – but an artistic one as well

David Lister
Arts Editor
Monday 07 December 2015 23:43 GMT
Comments
Builders taking a break outside one of the houses designed by the Turner Prize-winning Assemble collective in Cairns Street, part of the Granby Four Streets area in Liverpool
Builders taking a break outside one of the houses designed by the Turner Prize-winning Assemble collective in Cairns Street, part of the Granby Four Streets area in Liverpool (AFP)

But is it art? It’s a question that goes with the territory when it comes to the Turner Prize. And it’s a question that can certainly be asked of this year’s winner.

Well, if home improvements are art (and perhaps we all think that in our more self-absorbed, house-proud moments) then Assemble are artists.

Working with residents in run-down communities to refurbish their homes, victims of regeneration schemes, the exhibit on show has examples of the work they undertook in Liverpool’s Toxteth area, with tiles, wobbly basins, granite fireplaces and printed fabrics taking pride of place in the installation.

But, of course, this installation by the London collective, a recreation of a terraced house with the floors taken out, is far more than home improvements. It makes a sociological point – that distinctive community streets were erased in thoughtless regeneration programmes – as well as an artistic point – by recreating distinctive traditional elements stripped out in the regeneration.

An exhibition by the Assemble collective in Glasgow before the £25,000 Turner Prize was announced (PA)

So, is it art, is it architecture, is it craft, is it design? Is it social service? Is it, to use the increasingly in vogue phrase, “Useful Art”? It’s all of these things, and that is why it is a worthy winner. To put it another way, it is art, but not as we know it.

I wouldn’t want it every year. I would love a shortlist of paintings one year. That would be truly radical. But in the meantime, I’m more than happy to applaud Assemble’s win, as it both positively and perplexingly makes us rethink and redefine the meaning of art.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in