Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Dissident artist Ai Weiwei returns to China after 10 years in exile

The artist, who left Beijing in 2015, has clashed with Chinese authorities over his politically engaged work

Video Player Placeholder
Related: Ai Weiwei is released

Chinese dissident artist Ai Weiwei has spoken about the experience of quietly returning to his homeland for the first time in about a decade, describing it as being like a “phone call that had been disconnected for 10 years suddenly reconnecting”.

The three-week visit in December was Ai’s first since 2015, when Chinese authorities returned his passport. It had been confiscated nearly four years earlier when he was subject to tax evasion charges, which also saw him detained for 81 days.

He lived under police surveillance after his release, with his phone and internet use strictly monitored, before moving to Berlin. He spent the next decade living in Germany, the UK and Portugal.

Ai Weiwei speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting in New York City
Ai Weiwei speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting in New York City (Getty)

During his visit, Ai shared pictures and videos on social media of personal moments in Beijing as he travelled with his teenage son and reunited with his 93-year-old mother.

Ai told CNN he didn’t need to take any particular precautions for his visit, although he was “inspected and interrogated” for almost two hours at the airport in Beijing.

“The questions were very simple. How long do you plan to stay here? Where else do you plan to go?” he told the US media outlet, adding that the rest of his time in the country was “smooth and, one could say, pleasant”.

Asked whether this suggested a change in the attitude of Chinese authorities towards him, Ai said he didn’t believe there had been a recent shift, and that it was instead a reflection of his longtime views.

“Although a country or group may disagree with my positions, they at least recognise that I speak sincerely and not for personal gain,” he said.

He described the experience of returning as emotionally significant, especially after 10 years away.

“What I missed most was speaking Chinese,” he said. “For immigrants, the greatest loss is not wealth, loneliness or an unfamiliar lifestyle, but the loss of linguistic exchange.”

Ai Weiwei at his installation in Piccadilly Circus in London in 2024
Ai Weiwei at his installation in Piccadilly Circus in London in 2024 (Getty)

Ai’s conflict with the Chinese authorities arose from a series of direct challenges to the official narrative. After the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, he launched an investigation into the collapse of school buildings and published the names of more than 5,000 children who had died, accusing officials of corruption in relation to shoddy construction.

“The kind of authoritarian state we have in China cannot survive if it answers questions – if the truth is revealed, they are finished. So they started to think of me as the most dangerous person in China. That made me become an artist, but also an activist,” he wrote in a 2018 opinion piece for The Guardian.

From exile, Ai continued to make politically engaged work, including the 2020 documentary Coronation, which examined China’s handling of the Covid outbreak, and Cockroach, which focused on the 2019 Hong Kong protests.

He had previously made Human Flow, a film about the global refugee crisis, which took him to nearly 20 countries. His 2016 installation Laundromat used clothing left behind by refugees to evoke displacement and loss.

In 2023, the artist had said he would return to China if “they don’t take my personal freedom away, if I can express myself freely, and if they do not put me in jail secretly again”.

“It’s just about the very basic principles of surviving, so I cannot,” Ai said at an exhibition in London in April 2023.

In an interview with The Independent last year, Ai talked about the double standards of the West’s “so-called democracies”.

“You cannot talk about human rights in Russia or China and then apply different rights in the Middle East,” he said. “You’re just using too many double or triple standards. The West has totally lost the moral high ground.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in