Chess: One step further
TODAY'S game, from the Hastings Challengers, shows how it always pays to look a little further before concluding a line of analysis. The moves 1. c4 g6 2. g3 Bg7 3. Bg2 d6 4. d4 e5 5. dxe5 dxe5 6. Qxd8+ Kxd8 7. Nc3 Nd7 8. Nh3 h6 9. 0-0 c6 10. b3 Ne7 11. Bb2 Nc5 12. Rad1+ Kc7 13. f4 Be6 14. fxe5 Nd7 led to the diagram position.
Colin McNab is playing White against Colin Crouch. There is an immediate priority to analyse 15. Nd5+. An extremely lazy player would now say to himself: 'After 15. Nd5+ cxd5 16. cxd5, Black has either 16 . . . Bxh3 or 16 . . . Nxd5 17. Bxd5 Bxh3. There may be a few problems after that, but one of them must be OK.'
An averagely lazy player will see that 16 . . . Bxh3 17. d6+ Kc8 18. Bxh3 leaves Black in a terrible mess with Bxd7+, Rxf7 and e6 all menacingly in the air.
Colin Crouch probably saw all that, and looked at 16 . . . Nxd5 17. Bxd5 Bxh3 18. Rxf7 Rhg8 before deciding it was fine for Black, since 19. e6 allows Bxb2. McNab, however, saw further. In deciding to play 15. Nd5+, he needed to continue the analysis with 19. e6 Bxb2 20. Rxd7+ Kb6 21. Rxb7+ Ka6 and realise that Black was in the most awful mess after 22. e7. The game ended 22 . . . Rg7 23. Rb4] and Black resigned. If he moves the attacked rook from a8, there follows 24. Bb7+ Ka5 25. Rb5 mate.
(Graphic omitted)
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies