Banning smoking in child-friendly films violates freedom of speech, MPAA argues
The plaintiffs in the ongoing legal case insist it is about 'false advertising' not 'artistic freedom'
![Glenn Close smokes as Cruella De Vil in Disney's G-rated 101 Dalmations](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/12/19/13/101-dalmatians-glenn-close-.jpg)
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
![Louise Thomas](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/louise-thomas.png)
Louise Thomas
Editor
Banning smoking in child-friendly films would be a freedom of speech violation, the Motion Picture Association of America has said.
Plaintiffs are suing the MPAA over movies rated G, PG and PG-13 that feature tobacco imagery, arguing that no films deemed suitable for children should show smoking given the scientifically-proven health risks.
The case is “no different” to the hypothetical scenario of Coke, Pepsi and Dr Pepper forming a trade association to investigate fizzy drinks, finding that an ingredient within them causes serious disease that could prematurely kill one million people and deciding to label their drink bottles suitable for children anyway, the plaintiffs wrote in a memorandum filed last Friday and published by The Hollywood Reporter.
The MPAA has defended its actions by insisting that as movie ratings are “opinions” based on what the average US parent might consider suitable viewing for their child, it is a matter of freedom of speech protected from legal action by the First Amendment. The plaintiffs, however, argue that their complaint “raises no question of artistic freedom” but “deals with quotidian issues of false labeling and advertising”.
The case continues but should the plaintiffs win, it is possible that Hollywood’s rating system could face similar lawsuits over films that depict “alcohol use, gambling, contact sports, bullying, consumption of soda or fatty foods, or high speed driving”. The MPAA believes that for this reason, ratings should not be used to “prescribe socially-appropriate values” to cinemagoers, while the plaintiffs insist that Hollywood cannot continue to certify that a movie is appropriate for children if scientists have proven otherwise.
The World Health Organisation published its Smoke-Free Movies report in February after finding that 36 per cent of movies rated for young people in 2014 showed someone smoking. Even 3D sci-fi film Transformers: Age of Extinction featured cigar-smoking robot.
“The tobacco industry has been looking at alternatives to promote their products and film is the last frontier for tobacco companies,” said Dr Armando Peruga of the WHO’s tobacco-free initiative at the time. “In some films, the percentage of tobacco scenes is far greater than you would see in the society in which the film is set.”
The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that six million young people will start smoking after seeing film and TV stars doing so. Disney announced that it would be prohibiting smoking from its films last year, including all Marvel, Lucas and Pixar movies, “except when a historical figure who may have smoked is depicted”.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments