An Australian jury sided with Wilson back in June, concluding that the actor lost Hollywood roles and should be paid money as compensation.
Justice John Dixon told the Supreme Court of Victoria, via the BBC, that the defamation case was “unprecedented" for the country.
A fake beer belly, third nipples and best kiss gongs at the MTV Movie Awards 2013: Taylor Lautner, Rebel Wilson and Emma Watson at the youth culture celebration
Show all 21
"Substantial vindication can only be achieved by an award of damages that underscores that Ms Wilson's reputation as an actress of integrity was wrongly damaged in a manner that affected her marketability in a huge worldwide marketplace,” he said.
Bauer Media denies the articles were defamatory, a lawyer saying they are considering further action.
Wilson was not in court when the money was awarded but was present in June when the initial judgement was given.
"I had to stand up to a bully, a huge media organisation, Bauer Media, who maliciously took me down in 2015 with a series of grubby and completely false articles,” she said, pledging to give the money to "charity, scholarships or [investment] into the Aussie film industry to provide jobs”.
Wilson was present every day in court throughout the three-week trial, spending six days in the witness box. A six-woman jury rejected Bauer Media’s claims that the articles were subjectively true and did not affect Wilson’s acting career.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies