While speaking at the Cheltenham Literary Festival, the Four Weddings screenwriter revealed that he was initially against casting Hugh Grant as the lead in the 1994 romantic comedy, as he found the actor “annoying, too good-looking, and a bit posh”.
However, Curtis was overruled by the film’s director Mike Newell, who wanted Grant for the role of a socially awkward man who falls for the American (Andie MacDowell) he keeps crossing paths with at four different weddings (and a funeral).
“We auditioned about 70 people for Hugh’s part. Eventually it was down to Hugh and Alan Rickman. I went for Alan but I was outvoted,” he said.“I just thought Hugh was a bit annoying, too good-looking and a bit posh. I was right about all of those things but he was also very good.”
The writer and director behind rom-coms such as Notting Hill, About Time, and Bridget Jones’s Diary, was interviewed by his daughter Scarlett Curtis at the ten-day festival, allowing him to reflect back on his career and share some of his own regrets. Namely, Curtis told the audience he wished he had written more about the later years of love, specifically about marriage.
“Things go up and down and they are very complicated. I wish I’d done more of that. We all wish we’d had more time,” he said. “I was going to write a play about my parents. I didn’t write that.”
He also revealed that two Love Actually subplots were meant to be their own separate films. He said: “The Hugh one I had an idea for a long time ago and you would have seen him coming into power and issues around that. And [for] the Colin one, he was going to go on holiday with his girlfriend then split up.
“Those two were intended to be very unsuccessful films so I am very glad I managed to squeeze all the good bits out of them – 12 minutes each – it to Love Actually.”
Follow Independent Culture on Facebook for all the latest on Film, TV, Music, and more.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies