Shrek the Third (U) <img src="http://www.independent.co.uk/template/ver/gfx/twostar.gif" alt="twostar"></img>

Reviewed,Anthony Quinn
Friday 29 June 2007 00:00
Comments

It's monster week. You'd never see these movies on a double bill together but, oddly enough, both Shrek the Third and Hostel: Part II derive from a similar tradition, albeit drastically mutated, of Americans abroad in Europe.

After the dismal third-part instalments of Spider-Man, Pirates of the Caribbean and Ocean's Thirteen, it would not require much of Shrek the Third to raise the summer "threequel" to a level of acceptable entertainment. And as these things go it pootles along quite pleasantly, buoyed on the same mixture of tittering slapstick and arch pop-culture references that ranks it a little lower than the Pixar movies, and a lot lower than The Simpsons.

In the three years since Shrek 2, the technical wizardry has rapidly advanced to the point where one of the effects supervisors talks of the development of "new hair simulation tools allowing for more realistic motion and collisions with geometry". It sounds more like that famous cure for baldness.

While at DreamWorks they are very excited about these new technologies and the micro-fastidious detailing that they enable, one wonders if they have been maintaining an equivalent sharpness elsewhere. The pastiches taste a bit off, and the one-liners only occasionally score a hit on the funny bone. Just as Shrek 2 couldn't match the newly minted surprise of the original, so Shrek the Third can't compete for freshness with either.

Character-wise, there have been no discernible advances. Our irascible ogre-hero is still battling with the problem of low self-esteem (as who might not, with a phiz like that). In the first movie he thought himself unworthy of love; in the second he agonised about his role as consort to royalty; now, he's having the jitters about the prospect of fatherhood.

One sequence plays out an anxiety dream in which Shrek dandles his new-born son in front of him, and all seems well; then the infant – an ogreling, I suppose – burps and disgorges a torrent of green puke that blasts his father to the other side of the room. I have to admit that I laughed.

After the frog-king (voiced by John Cleese) pegs out, it devolves on Shrek either to assume the crown himself or else to seek out the only other living heir. Having no regal ambitions, he sets sail with his companions Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas) to find the rightful successor, who turns out to be a bullied student at Worcestershire High, named Artie .

This looks to be the cue for a medieval pastiche of high-school movies: I liked the drugs counsellor whose message to the kids is, "Just say nay", but maidenly cheerleaders and jock knights seem weak, as does the script: "Artie a king? More like the mayor of Loserville." They've got Justin Timberlake to voice the unfancied heir, but the character is so bland and unconvincing that they could have hired Chris O'Donnell and no one would have noticed.

With Puss and Donkey misfiring as a double-act this time around, the four screenwriters (who include the director, Chris Miller) could have compensated by introducing a really good villain. Instead, they fall back on Prince Charming, who's merely a hammy stage actor – voiced by Rupert Everett – desperate to be famous. When he goes to a tavern to round up all the fairy-tale losers (The Ugly Sisters, Captain Hook, Rumplestiltskin) the lounge singer there is maundering through "I've Been to Paradise (But I've Never Been to Me)", which is a perfect sort of anthem for these malcontents.

Access unlimited streaming of movies and TV shows with Amazon Prime Video Sign up now for a 30-day free trial

Sign up

The subsequent plot in which Charming proceeds to stage a palace coup never really catches fire, and with Shrek delivering the usual be-true-to-yourself pep talk to Artie, one feels a bit starved of excitement. In time to come the three movies will blur into one big Shrek soup, so not much harm has been done. All the same, it would be a good idea for those involved to quit while they're still (just about) winning.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in