Letter: Abusive teachers

Matt Dunkley
Tuesday 03 November 1998 01:02 GMT
Comments

Sir: I am writing to clarify comments made by me which are extensively quoted in your article "End to teacher blacklist ordered" (28 October). Stripped of their context, my remarks can, and have been, interpreted as meaning that I know of teachers who are working in East Sussex who are guilty of abusive action against children, and that I can do nothing about it.

This is not the case. My comments related to teachers dismissed by my authority for abusive acts against children. We have put their cases to the Department of Education and Employment for inclusion on List 99, the national register of staff banned from working in schools. They have been rejected by the DfEE, usually because there is no criminal conviction of the teacher. We have satisfied ourselves and the schools' governors sufficiently of their guilt to sack them and ban them from our schools. However, because of the unrealistically high standards of proof required for List 99, they are free to teach anywhere else in the country.

Those of us working in this field have to ensure children's safety and adequately protect teachers' employment rights. Under the current system we have got the balance wrong, and it is not in favour of the children.

MATT DUNKLEY

Assistant Director of Education

East Sussex County Council

Lewes

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in