Letter: Brain-teaser
Your support helps us to tell the story
My recent work focusing on Latino voters in Arizona has shown me how crucial independent journalism is in giving voice to underrepresented communities.
Your support is what allows us to tell these stories, bringing attention to the issues that are often overlooked. Without your contributions, these voices might not be heard.
Every dollar you give helps us continue to shine a light on these critical issues in the run up to the election and beyond
Eric Garcia
Washington Bureau Chief
Sir: Fay Weldon's assertion that higher-intelligence people tend to constitute the "haves" in our society is almost certainly correct ("The poor and the illiterate we will always have with us", 20 December). However, virtually all her supporting evidence and the basis of her argument is unsubstantiated.
She confuses low measured IQ with mental health problems and social exclusion. She asserts that intelligence correlates with career success; I know of no evidence linking measured IQ, as opposed to "being smart", to job success in any specific career.
We have no idea what proportion of any individual's measured IQ is utilised in any particular activity in their life. Who are we to assume that IQ is present or not present when someone does something stupid or, worse, fails to cope with modern life? This approach is a preliminary to eugenics.
Frequent research has indicated that the occupational group with the highest measured IQ are psychologists, whose colleagues devise the questionnaires. Does this not give the lie to Ms Weldon's whole approach?
Dr COLIN SELBY
Chartered Occupational Psychologist
Bath
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments