Letter: High flyers

Wednesday 01 December 1999 00:02 GMT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I hope the answers given in your weekly Technoquest column are usually more accurate than the statement that aircraft cannot fly at altitudes greater than 60,000 feet (26 November). Going back to the mid-1960s the Lockheed U-2 and SR-71 had service ceilings of 90,000 and 95,000 feet respectively.

MARTIN COPSEY

Peterborough

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: High flyers

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering