Letter: The guilt of spies
Sir: Colin Burke asks rhetorically, "Would an Iraqi who betrayed Saddam Hussein's secrets be guilty of an immoral act?" (letter, 14 September). Indeed not: he would be subverting a tyranny, at immense personal risk. By contrast, Melita Norwood served a totalitarian and expansionist power in preference to her own country, a liberal democracy, at - we now know - no cost to herself (other than, presumably, forfeiting the trust of her family and ex-colleagues). Does Mr Burke really need to have the moral difference between these courses spelled out?
OLIVER KAMM
London WC1
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies