Letter: Xenophobic anthem

Thursday 13 August 1998 23:02 BST

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I freely admit to being a Nationalist, if neither an anarchist or an atheist, but Donald Foreman (letter, 5 August)does fail to address important failings about the National Anthem.

Firstly in no sense is it a hymn. It was first sung by the Drury Lane players in 1745 as the Jacobite armies were advancing on London. The fourth verse that nobody has sung for donkey's years contained a plea to the Almighty to "crush native Scots".

How can such an 18th-century xenophobic ditty be in any way seen as either Christian or National?

JAMES SAMUEL COLE

Neath, West Glamorgan

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: Xenophobic anthem

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering