Duran Duran lose High Court battle over US rights to some of their hit songs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Duran Duran members have lost a High Court battle over the US rights to some of their most famous songs.
Simon Le Bon and other members of the group had been arguing that US copyright laws gave them the right to call for a reversion of copyright after 35 years.
However lawyers for Gloucester Place Music Ltd successfully argued that English laws of contract prevented them from doing so.
They claimed that band members had breached music publishing agreements by serving notices to terminate the grant to the company of US copyrights in their first three albums: Duran Duran, Rio, and Seven and The Ragged Tiger, as well as their Bond theme 'A View To A Kill'.
The band released a string of hits including 'Hungry Like The Wolf' and 'Rio' after the release of their self-titled debut in 1981.
Under US law, songwriters have an 'inalienable right' to call for a reversion of copyright after 35 years. However Gloucester Place said the agreements with the Duran Duran members are governed by English laws of contracts.
The High Court ruling could prevent the pop group from seeking to claim back copyright in their first three albums.
The legal action was being viewed as a test case which could affect other UK songwriters who have signed similar agreements with publishing companies.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments