Keir Starmer mocked as awkward Line of Duty joke met with complete silence at PMQs

‘Can’t be the only one who thought this was proper cringe?’ commented one person

Johnson and Starmer reference Line of Duty in PMQs

Keir Starmer has been mocked online after his Line of Duty joke fell flat during the Prime Minister’s Questions

The Labour leader referenced the hit BBC police drama today (14 April) over a row concerning former PM David Cameron lobbying ministers on behalf of the collapsed finance firm Greensill Capital.

“Every day there’s more evidence of the sleaze that’s at the heart of this conservative government,” said Starmer, who accused Boris Johnson of “blocking a proper inquiry” into the matter.

Starmer said: “The Greensill scandal is just the tip of the iceberg – dodgy contracts, privileged access, jobs for their mates. This is the return of the Tory sleaze.”

He quipped: “Ted Hastings and AC-12 are needed to get to the bottom of this one.”

In Line of Duty, Superintendent Hastings (Adrian Dunbar) heads up AC-12, an anti-corruption unit interested in “catching bent coppers” – a catchphrase of the series. 

Riffing off Starmer’s joke, Johnson replied: “We are getting on with rooting out ‘bent coppers’, Mr Speaker. We’re also hiring thousands more police officers.”

The exchange between the two politicians apparently did not go down well given that it was met with an awkward silence.

Viewers at home have taken to social media to comment on the unexpected reference.

One user wrote: “Starmer’s Line of Duty joke fell about as flat as it’s possible to do so”, while another added: “Bless Keir trying to be relevant by using #LineofDuty at #PMQs.” 

“Oh god stop politicians stop ruining Line of Duty,” wrote someone else.

A third person added: “A bit cringey but I love it anyway. Imagine Ted Hastings grilling Boris Johnson at PMQs.”

Access unlimited streaming of movies and TV shows with Amazon Prime Video Sign up now for a 30-day free trial

Sign up

“Keir Starmer and Boris Johnson feebly trading cheesy Line of Duty jibes at PMQs,” said someone. “A pair of vapid idiots driving the infantilisation of politics, and hastening the lamentable decline in the standard of British political discourse. Pathetic.”

“Can’t be the only one who thought this was proper cringe?” commented another person, while another agreed: “Line of Duty references in parliament is cringe.”

“You know things are getting bad when this happens during PMQ’s,” said someone else. “Kier just referenced Line of Duty at PMQ’s. Ruined it now.”

Other people, however, appeared to appreciate the pop culture reference.

Line of Duty and Ted Hastings mentioned in #PMQs I am wetting myself with laughter,” said one person.

“Brilliant exchange,” commented another.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in