Benefits Street: Ratings rise again as record 5.2m tune in to third episode

The show has added almost 1m viewers since the first episode two weeks ago

Daisy Wyatt
Tuesday 21 January 2014 12:06 GMT
Comments
Mark Thomas and Becky Howe, both 23, are 'fuming' over their presentation in Benefits Street
Mark Thomas and Becky Howe, both 23, are 'fuming' over their presentation in Benefits Street

Ratings for the controversial Channel 4 show Benefits Street grew again last night as 5.2 million viewers tuned in to watch the programme.

The documentary, which has sparked a police probe and a campaign urging Channel 4 to drop the show, is the channel's most successful show in over a year.

The first episode attracted 4.3 million viewers when it debuted earlier this month.

Last night’s third episode added a further 200,000 viewers to the second episode after five million tuned in to watch the programme last Monday.

The show, which has been branded “poverty porn”, has been attacked for its negative and stereotypical portrayal of people on benefits.

An online petition urging the broadcaster to axe the programme has received more than 55,000 signatures, claiming that the show does not honestly portray the residents who live in James Turner Street in Birmingham.

James Turner Street resident Fungi and his dog in 'Benefits Street' (Channel 4)

Arshad Mahmood, a former Birmingham bus driver who started the petition, states on the change.org website: “Benefits Street has portrayed people on benefits as scroungers and it’s wrong. The backlash and abuse of social networks towards people on benefits as a result of this show has shocked me.

“Channel 4 should not broadcast any further episodes of the programme – it is creating a skewed image of a section of society and stirring up hatred.”

A police probe was launched after the first episode of Benefits Street when a number of Twitter users made death threats towards the residents seen on the show.

Channel 4 has defended the show, calling it a “fair and balanced observational documentary series”, but the programme has provoked a nationwide debate about the media’s portrayal of people on benefits.

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free
Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free

Writing in The Independent, Owen Jones said Channel 4 had a greater responsibility to portray welfare claimants more accurately.

“This dross has left the public woefully ill-informed,” he said. “The public is not aware that most social security spending is, rightly, spent on pensioners who have paid in all their lives; or that the Government’s freeze on benefits mostly hits working people.”

Read more

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in