Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Dancing on Ice: Ashley Banjo defends Rufus Hound for criticising government over free school meals

‘I think it’s nonsense,' said the Diversity star

Annabel Nugent
Friday 22 January 2021 09:21 GMT
Comments
Rufus Hound calls out UK government during Dancing on Ice

Dancing on Ice judge Ashley Banjo has defended comedian Rufus Hound after he was criticised for calling out the government during the competition’s first live show last Sunday (17 January).

Although many viewers praised Hound for his comments condemning the government’s handling of free school meals, media watchdog Ofcom received 341 complaints following the comedian’s remarks on the programme.

When asked by Metro whether Hound’s comments were “appropriate”, the Diversity star responded: “I’ve said this before, he’s a comedian, he’s an intelligent and emotional man who takes cues from the real world around him to formulate an opinion. That’s what we all do.”

The 32-year-old – who is one of four judges on the series – added: “He said something in response to that and that’s how he felt. Of course, he’s allowed to say that. It’s his prerogative.”

“I was sitting there and if people agree with the idea that people aren’t allowed to express their opinion because the show is a ‘family show’, I think it’s nonsense,” said Banjo.

Following Hound’s performance opposite professional skater Robin Johnstone last week, the comedian made a reference to the recent free school meals scandal.

Speaking to presenter Phillip Schofield, Hound remarked: “Mate, we live in a world where people we elect don't want to feed hungry children, so this is the least mad thing that's happened to me in a long time!”

Last year, Boris Johnson’s conservative government was widely criticised for voting against a proposal to extend the free school meals scheme over the holidays.

Following public pressure, the government later approved the idea, however, controversy reared its head again this month as pictures of paltry food parcels – supposedly valued at £30, but with an estimated cost of nearer £5 – went viral on social media.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in