Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Don't Panic: How To End Poverty in 15 Years, TV review: Why didn't we hear from the rich?

Swedish pop-star statistician Hans Rosling presented a cross between an extended TED Talk, election night and a Comic Relief human-story segment

Sally Newall
Wednesday 23 September 2015 22:30 BST
Comments
It all adds up: Hans Rosling presented ‘Don’t Panic: How To End Poverty in 15 Years’
It all adds up: Hans Rosling presented ‘Don’t Panic: How To End Poverty in 15 Years’ (BBC)

The small matter of ending “extreme poverty” by 2030 – measured as those living on less than $1.25 a day – realistically, is not one that can be solved in an hour of primetime telly. Yet Hans Rosling, the Swedish pop-star statistician gave it a good go in his inimitable style. His upbeat conclusion that the first newly drawn-up development goal is indeed possible, even “easy”, was an uplifting thought on a grey autumn day - if over-simplified in this package.

This show was made to tie-in with the UN’s new development targets and was in the same vein as 2013’s Don’t Panic - The Truth About Population, with a more over-blown premise. But Rosling convinced with his combo of a presentation of colourful bubble graphs and props interspersed with pre-filmed human stories. The effect was a cross between an extended TED Talk – the format that made his name – combined with election night and a Comic Relief human-story segment.

Rosling’s shtick is making the complex seem mind-numbingly simple, delivered with humour.

“We Swedes are quite good at self-assemble furniture,’ he said wheeling on a giant graph to illustrate how poverty levels had changed. I think it needed the pre-filmed segments to bring the ideas to life - like the family for whom a bad harvest led to ‘Hunger Season’, where they only ate once a day. We saw how the likes of water pumps and electric bikes could lift families out of poverty, whereas an expected medical bill could send them spiralling back down.

I was waiting to hear from the rich, but they didn’t get a look in. There is only so much you can do in an hour, after all. Rosling’s conclusions: “right actions, economic growth and better-focussed aid” were broad-brush solutions, but he made them sound possible - for 60 minutes at least.

twitter.com/sally_newall

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in