A shoe-in: Filipino election pushes notorious Marcos family – and Imelda’s footwear – back into the limelight

It was reported that the former first lady had nearly 3,000 pairs of shoes

Thomas Kingsley
Tuesday 10 May 2022 13:48
Comments
<p>Shoes of former Philippine first lady Imelda Marcos, displayed at the Shoe Museum in Manila</p>

Shoes of former Philippine first lady Imelda Marcos, displayed at the Shoe Museum in Manila

The election of Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr as president of the Philippines has pushed the controversial family, best known for excess, back into the international spotlight.

During his presidency in the 1960s to 1980s, Ferdinand Marcos Sr – the new president’s father – along with his wife Imelda Marcos, stole billions of dollars from the Filipino people, amassing a personal wealth experts have estimated to be up to $10bn (£8bn) before they were finally caught in 1986.

Marcos Sr’s premiership is largely remembered for its corruption and brutality including his rule as a dictator under martial law from 1972 to 1981 before being forced from office and fleeing the country in 1986.

Imelda Marcos, the former first lady, however, was known particularly for her opulent lifestyle, eye for luxury and matchless shoe collection.

Hollywood actor George Hamilton and lawyer James Linn hold hands with Imelda Marcos as she celebrates her 70th birthday party

When protesters stormed Malacanang Palace in 1986, it was famously discovered that more than 2,700 pairs of shoes had been left behind in Imelda’s wardrobe. She was later quoted as saying: “They went into my closets looking for skeletons, but thank god, all they found were shoes, beautiful shoes.”

Thirty years later, hundreds of pairs of the first lady’s obsession can still to be found at the Shoe Museum in the northern city of Marikina while another collection is in the National Museum of the Philippines.

Some 800 pairs are on exhibit at the museum, which opened in 2016, and venue manager Gina Romero said they came from a condominium in the prime business district of Makati.

The shoes are a mix of local and imported brands – pairs by Ferragamo, Givenchy, Chanel, Christian Dior, Charles Jourdan and Bally, along with well-known local brands. They come in high heels, flats, sandals, boots and slippers – many glittering with bling, all still in prime condition.

Local makers reportedly gave the then-first lady 10 pairs of shoes a week, according to ABC News Australia.

It was reported that the former first lady had nearly 3,000 pairs of shoes

According to a museum staffer, a pair of local shoes cost between $6-11 while imported shoes cost up to $100 or more a pair. Of the remaining pairs of shoes in the Imelda collection, 253 are on display, while 467 are in storage, according to local reports.

In 2012, the Associated Press reported that more than 1,000 pairs had been damaged by termites and mould, after years of being stashed in boxes. They were only discovered after being drenched in rainwater that leaked through the ceiling of the museum hall they were locked in.

A 2017 documentary, spotlighted Imelda Marcos’ turbulent political career and her opulent lifestyle. The former first lady spoke about her fashion obsession in the documentary called The Kingmaker. “When I became first lady, it became demanding for me. I have to dress up and make myself more beautiful,” Imelda, now 92, said in the trailer for film. “Because the poor always looks for a star.”

Now, Marcos Jr is set for a surprise ascension to the country’s highest office after he trounced bitter rival Leni Robredo to become the first candidate in recent history to win an outright majority in a Philippines presidential election.

A volunteer cleans shoes of Marcos on display at Marikina Shoe Museum

Marcos Jr fled into exile in Hawaii with his family during a 1986 “people power” uprising that ended his father’s 20-year autocratic rule, and has served in congress and the senate since his return to the Philippines in 1991. Ferdinand Marcos Sr died in 1989.

“There are thousands of you out there, volunteers, parallel groups, political leaders that have cast their lot with us because of our belief in our message of unity,” Marcos Jr said in a statement streamed on Facebook, while standing beside the Philippine flag.

Thousands of opponents of the senior Marcos suffered persecution during a brutal 1972-1981 era of martial law, and the family name became synonymous with plunder, cronyism and extravagant living, with billions of dollars of state wealth disappearing.

Around 400 people, mostly students, staged a protest outside the election commission on Tuesday against Marcos Jr and citing election irregularities.

The Commission on Election (Comelec), which said the poll was relatively peaceful, also upheld its dismissals of complaints filed by different groups, including victims of martial law, that had sought to disbar Marcos Jr from the presidential race based on a 1995 tax evasion conviction.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in