Climate change scientists urged to be more open to the public about uncertainties

A new report calls for experts to communicate their research more clearly

Tom Bawden
Tuesday 09 June 2015 17:35
Comments
Global average temperatures reach about 4C higher than pre-industrial times by 2100, according to predictions
Global average temperatures reach about 4C higher than pre-industrial times by 2100, according to predictions

Climate change scientists must be more honest about the limits of their knowledge and uncertainty around predictions if they are to win the trust of the public, according to a new report.

Scientists are under increasing pressure to communicate their research more clearly, to galvanise politicians into taking decisive action to combat climate change, and to help promote their universities.

They are also keen to make their findings meaningful to a public which feels alienated from much climate change research, which is largely abstract and concerned with developments that often lie decades in the future, said Dr Gregory Hollin, of the University of Nottingham.

But this increases the temptation to gloss over any uncertainties in research – an urge they should resist if they don’t want to lose credibility, his report says. And while referencing recent events such as floods and heatwaves can make climate change seem more tangible, they are much less scientifically certain as evidence.

“The most meaningful things are often the least certain things and so that potentially leads to difficulties because scientists are being asked to make their results really meaningful, while being incredibly certain. And there are instances when that leads to real tensions,” Dr Hollin told The Independent.

He acknowledged in some cases scientists are keen to play down uncertainties to limit the scope for climate sceptics to magnify their doubts and use it to attack research – but this approach makes the problem worse.The research, which Dr Hollin carried out with his colleague Dr Warren Pearce and is published in the journal Nature Climate Change, focused on a key press conference in 2013 when the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change unveiled its latest report.

The scientists repeatedly emphasised the finding that the decade from 2001 onwards was the hottest on record, to bolster the case that man-made climate change is happening and poses a major threat.

Scientists predict that if global average temperature increases by 2C then the proportion of extremes in heat attributed to climate change will increase from 75 per cent to 96 per cent

However, when asked about the widely perceived slowdown in global warming since the late 1990s – since shown by research in the US to be a fallacy – a scientist dismissed the question by saying that the period was too short to draw any meaningful conclusions.

“A switch to shorter periods made it harder to dismiss media questions about short-term uncertainties in climate science,” Dr Pearce wrote. “The fact scientists go on to dismiss journalists’ concerns about the pause – when they themselves drew upon a similar short-term example – made their position inconsistent.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in