Anxiety over the climate crisis is stopping people having children, study finds

Almost 60 per cent of American adults polled were also ‘very’ or ‘extremely concerned’ about the carbon footprint of having children

Young people launch the mock COP26 online to discuss climate change

People have expressed deep-seated anxieties about the climate crisis when it comes to whether or not they will have children, amid fears that the next generation will face difficult lives in a “dying world”, according to the first academic paper of its kind on the topic.

The procreation question has become a prevalent talking point since New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez asked last year if it is "ok to still have children” due to the impacts of climate change.

The new study of more than 600 adults, aged between 27 and 45, found that 96.5 per cent were “very” or “extremely” concerned about the well-being of their existing, or future, children in a world impacted by the consequences of global heating. 

The findings were due to an overwhelmingly negative outlook on the future, according to researchers from the Yale-NUS College, Singapore whose results were published in the journal, Climate Change, this month.

One woman, 31, told the researchers: “Climate change is the sole factor for me in deciding not to have biological children. I don’t want to birth children into a dying world. I dearly want to be a mother but climate change is accelerating so quickly, and creating such horror already, that bringing a child into this mess is something I can’t do."

The anxiety over the climate crisis was so pronounced that 6.3 per cent of parents expressed regret about having children due to their despair over the future of the planet.

“I regret having my kids because I am terrified that they will be facing the end of the world due to climate change,” one 40-year-old teacher and mother from Minnesota, told the survey-takers.

The survey, of 607 Americans, also discovered that 59.8 per cent of those polled were “very” or “extremely concerned” about the carbon footprint of having children.

An open-ended, follow-up question discovered that many respondents were conflicted about the issue.

Most had heard of, or read summaries of, academic papers about the carbon footprint of procreation, and deemed it “compelling” enough to factor into one of their life’s biggest decisions.

Percentage breakdown of respondents’ answers to “How concerned were/are you about your (potential) child’s lifetime carbon footprint?” and “How concerned were/are you about the climate impacts your (potential) child would/will witness or experience?”

One childfree, 32-year old consultant in Ohio said: “I cannot produce another person that will continue to destroy the planet, as they will inherit my first world lifestyle. I also cannot live with the feeling of responsibility that I made a decision to have a child for my own pleasure while destroying exactly what I’m fighting to save.”

Many parents and parents-to-be noted that the carbon footprint of having children had factored into them having a smaller family.

One 38-year old mother from Minnesota said: “I really didn’t think a lot about the carbon footprint of having another child, until I read something saying that the best thing you can do to reduce your carbon footprint is not reproduce. Thinking about that has influenced my decision not to have a third child."

Others did not accept the personal framing of a collective problem, the researchers found.

"I’m not going to not have a family because economic and political leaders have f***ed this up for everyone. That’s not on me as an individual and it makes me mad that under our neoliberal/individualistic framing it’s my responsibility to deny my spouse and myself that right. No, f*** that,” a 37-year old civil engineer and father in Massachusetts responded.

Younger adults expressed more concerned about the adverse impacts that the climate crisis would have on their children, compared to older people who were asked. 

Both men and women showed equal concern, the anonymous study titled “Eco-reproductive concerns in the age of climate change”, found. 

Professor Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, who led the study, told The Guardian: "The fears about the carbon footprint of having kids tended to be abstract and dry. 

"But the fears about the lives of existing or potential children were really deep and emotional. It was often heartbreaking to pore through the responses – a lot of people really poured their hearts out.”

In a 2017 study, from researchers Seth Wynes and Kimberly A. Nicholas, estimated that the carbon footprint of a child in the developed world is 58.6 tonnes each year of CO2-equivalent emissions (tCO2e- greenhouse gases including CO2, methane and nitrous oxide). 

 By comparison giving up your car only reduces a person’s carbon footprint by 2.4 tCO2e annually.

And a separate poll last year by Business Insider discovered that close to 30 per cent of US adults  “strongly agree, agree, or somewhat agree” that people should consider climate change when deciding to have children or not.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in