Rishi Sunak’s ‘dangerous’ tax relief for fossil fuel companies will accelerate ‘climate disaster’

If all 39 projects are approved they could produce the equivalent of nearly 1.9 billion barrels of oil

<p>The chancellor last week announced that energy firms would get a 91p tax saving for every £1 they invested in oil and gas extraction in the UK, to the end of 2025 </p>

The chancellor last week announced that energy firms would get a 91p tax saving for every £1 they invested in oil and gas extraction in the UK, to the end of 2025

Dozens of prospective fossil fuel projects in the UK that qualify for Rishi Sunak’s tax relief on oil and gas could together pump up to 899 million tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, analysis shows.

The chancellor announced last week that energy firms would get a 91p tax saving for every £1 they invested in oil and gas extraction in the UK, to the end of 2025.

Campaigners fear the move could cause companies to accelerate plans for projects that were already in the pipeline in order to benefit from the tax break.

Environmental group Uplift, which campaigns for a fossil free UK, identified 45 planned projects but said that between 33 and 39 of them were likely to be developed in the next three years.

They include Ithaca’s Marigold oilfield, BP’s Clair South project, and TotalEnergies’ Glendronach gas project. The controversial Cambo oilfield could also benefit, it added. On Wednesday, the government granted Shell a new permit to extract gas from the Jackdaw field.

If all 39 projects were approved, they could produce the equivalent of nearly 1.9 billion barrels of oil, which if burnt would emit as many as 899 million tonnes of greenhouse gases. That’s more than double the net amount of greenhouse gases the UK is estimated to have emitted in 2020 – around 405 million tonnes.

Caroline Lucas, Green MP for Brighton, shared Uplift’s concerns. She told The Independent that approving such projects would do nothing to cut energy bills or demand, and clearly wouldn’t cut emissions.

“The chancellor’s utterly unnecessary and downright dangerous tax breaks for fossil fuel companies don’t divert us from climate disaster – they send us hurtling even faster towards it,” Ms Lucas said. “In this year of our Cop presidency, incentivising and escalating the production of new climate-wrecking fossil fuels renders us a laughing stock on the world stage.”

Tessa Khan, director of Uplift, told The Independent: “If the investment loophole causes an acceleration in approval for projects, we will see disastrous consequences for the climate.

“Emissions from these projects in the pipeline are not compatible with the climate promises our government made when signing the Paris Agreement.”

Not all of the 899 million tonnes would be counted in the UK’s emissions, which only include those produced by UK-based businesses and consumed by UK residents.

Euan Graham, senior researcher at climate think tank E3G, agreed that the new tax break would be likely to speed up companies’ bids to get projects approved – a move he said was “undermining our climate safety”.

“This won’t help bring energy bills down, but it will put the brakes on a transition in the North Sea,” he said.

Mr Graham added that some of the projects might have gone ahead anyway, but he questioned whether they were an appropriate use of taxpayers’ money.

As previously reported by The Independent, The New Economics Foundation claims that the new tax relief will cost the taxpayer around £1.9bn a year, and that it risks short-changing the public further down the road, as by the time the investments start returning profits, the temporary windfall tax on oil and gas profits may no longer be in place.

Climate activists and opposition MPs have criticised the subsidy, pointing out that climate scientists, the United Nations and the International Energy Agency have made it clear that the world needs to stop new investment in fossil fuels if it wants to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. They also asked why the government didn’t extend the incentive to include investment in renewables, or use the money to insulate UK homes instead.

Uplift said the tax breaks could also undermine the shared government and industry target of halving emissions created in the extraction process by 2030 against a 2018 baseline.

The independent Climate Change Committee has already said the target is “well below” the 68 per cent it says is needed by 2030 if net zero by 2050 is to be achieved.

Energy companies have said they are assessing the impact of the new tax relief.

A government spokesperson said North Sea oil and gas were “crucial” to the UK’s domestic energy supply and security for the forseeable future, so it was “right” to encourage investment. The tax break allows for investment in activities to cut emissions, including electrification, they added.

“There are already numerous generous incentives available to bolster investment in renewable energy, including the super-deduction, the UK’s competitive R&D tax relief regime, and the Contracts for Difference scheme – making sure the UK continues to invest in clean energy too.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in