The Brexit process has been frustrating – whichever side of the debate you are on

The extension of the trade deal talks means there is plenty more still to say, writes Chris Stevenson

Deadlock: Boris Johnson and Ursula von der Leyen (AFP/Getty)

So Brexit talks roll on – with the UK and EU, in Boris Johnson’s words, still “very far apart” on major issues. 

A Voices piece from Michael Toner suggesting that no deal is better than staying within the EU will no doubt get plenty of reaction from readers – both from those who agree and those who don't. From the correspondence we receive, it is clear that many readers would see no deal as a travesty.

The conversations between officials from Boris Johnson's government and those from the EU will likely continue for another few days – with the prime minister no doubt being involved. Whether there will be any movement is hard to predict, but further discussion is better than an abrupt end to the talks.

The transition period has obviously been frustrating, whichever side of the Leave or Remain divide you sit on. The excellent Hamish McRae makes the point that it will be ordinary people and businesses that have to implement whatever is the result of the trade negotiations – and the ideological differences will slowly fade.

To that end, McRae preaches the gospel of decency and tolerance as the changes – no doubt some of them difficult even if a deal is forthcoming – are slowly put into effect. I agree that that is a sensible course of action, as both sides of the debate will likely make hay out of any difficulties.

We will keep bringing you pieces that allow you to make sense of what is happening as that process goes in – giving you all the information that you need, as well as the voices that will hopefully give you some food for thought – even if you don't agree with everything!

Yours,

Chris Stevenson

Voices editor