The government has many questions still to answer over its coronavirus strategy

Things have the potential to change quickly – but that’s no excuse for confusion, writes Chris Stevenson

A lockdown for those over-50 is one option said to be under consideration (Yui Mok/PA)

This is not the first time I’ve written about lockdown, but as my colleague Andrew Grice makes clear today, we are entering the latest of the crucial phases that have segmented the coronavirus pandemic.

A reader also writes today of their plan to continue shielding given the mixed messages that have left so many confused about what’s safe. There is always a need to change plans rapidly if we are to control the virus, but as Andrew writes, there is a lack of clarity that isn’t helpful to anyone.

Discussions over policy are important, but we have also received a number of messages from readers about the possible imposition of lockdown for the many over-50s and what it would mean for them, as well as to how much those who aren’t following rules are to blame.

There are a number of other questions fast approaching. Opening schools in September is an “absolute priority” for the government and it will be safe, the housing secretary Robert Jenrick said over the weekend. Meanwhile, government advisors – speaking in a personal capacity – have suggested the government may have to look at closing pubs and gyms in order to control the spread of Covid-19.

The announcement of a state of disaster in the Australian state of Victoria after a spike in infections, and the related curfew in Melbourne give us an insight into how quickly things can move. Australia has been more successful than much of the world in dealing with coronavirus, but it doesn’t take much to start shifting the needle.

This is what Boris Johnson and his government has to bear in mind, and people will have to deal with whatever changes come. But in return ministers have to make sure that citizens get the information they need quickly and clearly.

As ever, please let us know what you think of our coverage – and the areas you feel we should be investigating.

Yours,

Chris Stevenson

Voices editor