The west is in love with sanctions. Problem is, they don’t work
While sanctions continue to be imposed, the rest of the world is getting on with diplomacy, writes Borzou Daragahi
Last week, the United Nations Security Council announced a relaxation of sanctions on Afghanistan. It was an attempt to smooth the flow of humanitarian aid into one of the world’s most benighted nations and curb the suffering of millions of people dependent on international help for food and medicine. Nearly 23 million Afghans face acute food insecurity and 8.7 million are on the verge of famine, according to the Red Cross.
The easing of sanctions was welcomed by relief organisations worried they would run afoul of international law by having dealings with the country’s new Taliban masters. “Without a clear humanitarian exception, UN sanctions will remain an obstacle to the major humanitarian scale-up that the Afghan people need right now,” aid groups said.
The sanctions were put in place to punish Afghan warlords and extremists. Instead they were very clearly hindering aid to ordinary people, worsening their plight. But it’s not just Afghanistan. In many of the countries subject to sanctions, they bring about the opposite result. The efficacy of these sanctions merits serious scrutiny.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies