Can the government really not afford to pay for free school meals?
Two questions need to be asked. One is whether this is the most cost-effective option. The other is whether this will lead to another free TV licence or triple lock pensions situation, writes Hamish McRae
Is Marcus Rashford right? Can the government afford to pay for free school meals during the holidays and if so, why doesn’t it do it?
The answer to the first question is: yes of course he is. It is affordable, and as we have seen in political terms, it is damaging to the government not to follow his lead. The numbers are not large in the totality of public spending. Some £120m has been cited as the cost of extending the free schools meal programme on these lines and that number feels about right. Public spending this year is going to be more than £1 trillion – the Office for Budget Responsibility’s July estimates were that it would total £1,062bn, though the latest revenue and borrowing numbers look a little less daunting and revenues have held up better than forecast then.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies