Beyoncé's production company sued for 'discriminating against visually impaired fans'
The plaintiff is requesting that Parkwood Entertainment makes the website fully accessible to all users
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Beyoncé’s website is facing legal action following claims that it fails to accommodate visually impaired users.
Mary Conner, from New York, who is blind filed the class action lawsuit after recognising the website isn’t fully accessible to her or millions of others who have visual impairments.
Conner claims the website violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) by being “an exclusively visual interface” without any coded alt-text behind the images, meaning she is unable to browse the website or make online purchases without the assistance of a sighted companion.
“Web accessibility requires that alt-text be coded with each picture so that a screen-reader can speak the alternative text while sighted users see the picture,” writes attorney Dan Shaked.
“There are many important pictures on Beyoncé.com that lack a text equivalent. ... As a result, Plaintiff and blind Beyoncé.com customers are unable to determine what is on the website, browse the website or investigate and/or make purchases.”
Many websites use alt-text in the HTML mark-up to to help describe what an image is via an audio screenreader. There is no limit when it comes to what can be included in alt-text and it is often used to convey who or what is the focus of the image, what the message is, if the person is performing an action and if the person or people have a particular expression.
The lawsuit also cites a lack of accessible drop-down menus and the inability to use a keyboard instead of a mouse to navigate the website.
This is particularly important as users with visual impairments are typically not able to interact with a computer without assistive technologies such as Braille displays.
“The one and only form of entertainment that truly presents an even playing field between the visually impaired and the sighted is the joy of music,” Shaked continues.
“Plaintiff dreams of attending a Beyoncé concert and listening to her music in a live setting. However, when she browsed the Beyoncé.com website, she encountered numerous barriers which limited her accessibility to the goods and services offered on the website.”
As a result, Conner is asking the court for an injunction that would require Parkwood Entertainment to make the website accessible to visually impaired customers.
She is also seeking compensatory damages for class members who have “been subjected to unlawful discrimination”.
The Independent has contacted Parkwood Entertainment for comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments