Billie Eilish sparks optical illusion debate over colour of her Nike sneakers

Singer tells followers of shoe colour: ‘I don’t care what they look like, I care what they are’

Billie Eilish's Nike shoes are the sneaker version of 'the dress' optical illusion
Leer en Español

Billie Eilish has sparked a debate reminiscent of the one over “the dress” with photos and videos of a pair of her Nike shoes that she claims are mint green and white.

Over the weekend, the Bad Guy singer participated in a question-and-answer on her Instagram Stories, during which one of her followers asked for her input on the years-old question of whether the 2015 viral dress was blue and black or white and gold.

The singer then shared an optical illusion of her own, explaining that a few years ago she wore a pair of mint and white sneakers from Nike’s Air More Uptempo, only for her father to reveal that he thought the shoes were pink and white.

To Eilish’s surprise, many of her fans thought the shoes looked pink and white as well - prompting her to share a video of her searching for photos of the mint green sneakers to prove her point.

Among those disagreeing with Eilish was her mother, who admitted that the sneakers looked pink and green.

“I don't care what you think they look like, I care what they are," Eilish said at one point, later accusing the “whole internet” of gaslighting her.

In a further effort to prove the colour of the shoes, the Grammy winner took them outside, where she held them against actual pink and white shoes.

Despite her insistence, many of Eilish’s fans were divided, with the majority revealing that they see the sneakers as pink and white.

“Billie Eilish HAS to be colourblind,” one person tweeted. “Those shoes ARE pink and white.”

Another said: “Can we all agree Billie Eilish’s shoes are PINK AND WHITE?”

“I’m sorry to break it to you, but your shoes are very much pink and white,” someone else tweeted at the Ocean Eyes singer.  

Others were simply amused by the 18-year-old’s dedication to proving she was right.

“Billie Eilish getting into a heated argument over the colour of her shoes is one of the highlights of my day,” one person tweeted, while another said: “I will forever remember how Billie Eilish fought with the entire internet to prove a point about her mint white shoes.”

While the singer did not back down from the argument, she eventually asked her more than 67m Instagram followers to “let me have this” while referencing body-shaming she’s faced over recent viral paparazzi photos of herself.

"So we all know that I’m right here even if you see something else. You know that I’m right underneath it all, right?" she said. "And real quick: before you keep arguing or whatever the f***, the entire internet’s been calling me fat for a week, so let me have this."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in