Alexander Fury: Drivel-spouting David Gandy needs to realise that it doesn’t suit him
Wear, what, why, when?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.We’re in the midst of London Collections: Men – a bit of fancy-pants terminology for London menswear, or Men’s Frock Week as I’ve heard it termed. I’m flippant there, rather than downright derogatory like David Gandy, who slagged off some of the best and brightest of British talent on Alan Carr’s chat show a few weeks ago. You expect more from a member of the London Collections: Men committee, no?
I was less interested in the drivel he was spouting than what he was wearing: when Gandy decided to denigrate the work of maverick menswear designers Sibling and Craig Green, he did so in a stereotypically spivvy three-piece suit. It was an interesting physical embodiment of his views. For many people, pinstripes versus plain is the conservative confines of menswear, British or otherwise. That blinkered viewpoint has led to the presumption that the sombre suit is all menswear can offer. It even permeates the more dressy and fashion-conscious occasions, few though they are, on the social calendar. Example: while this week’s Royal Ascot allows flights of millinery fancy for women, men must wear morning dress. That dictates grey or black silk top hats with not even a coloured ribbon permitted. Given the strength of our fashion talent, especially in menswear, why is that still the case?
I’m not anti-suit. Far from it. The suit is modern; the Industrial Revolution in cloth. It’s also remained fairly unchanged since the early 1800s – look at the rapid change in women’s dress during that period and compare it to menswear. Especially menswear at Ascot – the blokes in the seminal Cecil Beaton-costumed race scene in My Fair Lady could be treading the Royal enclosure this week. The suit is not just for men: the defining female fashion item of the 20th century is the trouser-suit, courtesy of Yves Saint Laurent. And those still look modern today.
But I can’t help but bemoan the fact that a suited, booted and hatted gentleman is still our stereotypical image of menswear. How reactionary. How antiquated. How downright dull. Maybe that’s what you should have said, Mr Gandy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments