The retailer said the current 'promotional' market is making trading difficult
The retailer said the current 'promotional' market is making trading difficult

John Lewis gender neutral clothing labels faces public backlash

'Can we call it John Lewis anymore or does it have to be Joan Lewis?'

Olivia Petter
Monday 04 September 2017 09:20
Comments

Over the weekend, John Lewis announced that they would no longer use “boys” and “girls” labels on children’s clothing.

The progressive move was praised by many customers, who were happy to see a major retailer recognising the complexities of gender.

But that didn't stop an army of angry Twitter users - who find themselves triggered by change - doing their best to pick fault with John Lewis' decision.

“You have let us all down John Lewis, if only people stopped pandering to the PC brigade. There are only two sexes, male or female,” wrote one vexed person on Twitter.

“John Lewis’s introduction of ‘gender neutral’ kids clothes is a worrying sign of the times. Expect mental health issues to rocket,” added another.

Some expressed their horror at the thought of dressing their children in gender neutral clothing.

“This John Lewis thing is pure shi*te, my child is a boy and will be dressed as a boy…rugby tops, polo shirts, jeans..trainers etc..”

Even Piers Morgan weighed in on the debate, writing “Britain is going officially bonkers” in a tweet that has been liked over 20,000 times.

Whilst discussing the news on Good Morning Britain, the TV presenter joked “can we call it John Lewis anymore or does it have to be Joan Lewis?”

Not everyone was displeased though, some were quick to applaud the high street giant for its forward-thinking move.

“So pleased to see the news this morning that John Lewis has scrapped gendered clothing and toys. This is such an important move and I hope other retailers follow! Welcome to the 21st century,” one shopper wrote on the retailer’s Facebook page.

“Finally finally Finally! Someone has taken the step forward. Why shouldn't girls like cars and boys like Unicorns! Keep going,” praised another.

Some even said that they hoped other retailers would soon follow suit, as John Lewis is the first major retailer to introduce gender neutral clothing.

Unisex fashion has risen in popularity over the last few years, with British fashion houses – such as JW Anderson and Craig Green - using female models to showcase men’s clothes and vice versa, subsequently destabilising gender constraints when it comes to the way we dress.

Jaden Smith made headlines last year when he starred in Louis Vuitton’s SS16 womenswear campaign.

It’s not just luxury brands that are leading the way. Earlier this year H&M introduced an entirely unisex denim line.

It’s only a matter of time until gender-neutral dressing goes mainstream (and the only person who seems bonkers is Piers Morgan).

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in